Werewolf Genitalia
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
Werewolf Genitalia
Yeah, this is a rather uncomfortable topic, sorry.
So, most people seem to be of the opinion that male werewolves would have sheaths, and I think that makes sense.
But what about female werewolves? Would they retain their human genitalia, or develop canine genitalia? It would make more sense for them to have canine ones, simply because the males do. However, I've owned dogs for years and female dog genitals are not pretty by any stretch of the imagination.
Perhaps they could be located lower than a human female's, so that even if they were canine, you couldn't see them.
Thoughts?
(This doesn't necessarily apply to Freeborn...it can just be your general opinion.)
So, most people seem to be of the opinion that male werewolves would have sheaths, and I think that makes sense.
But what about female werewolves? Would they retain their human genitalia, or develop canine genitalia? It would make more sense for them to have canine ones, simply because the males do. However, I've owned dogs for years and female dog genitals are not pretty by any stretch of the imagination.
Perhaps they could be located lower than a human female's, so that even if they were canine, you couldn't see them.
Thoughts?
(This doesn't necessarily apply to Freeborn...it can just be your general opinion.)
- Anubis
- Legendary
- Posts: 6429
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:57 pm
- Custom Title: Eletist Jerk
- Gender: Male
- Location: Crossroads, ganking a hordie lowbie.
- Contact:
(i have no clue why i'm doing this) i'll go and post before the mods get ..well you know. sence what i think they evolved from wolves i think they should simular (stuff) like males have knots and sheths.
but eloved aswell with thier owners life a she wolf's enterance would be in the back i think it would like a human's.
your right even though its a little ebarassing but does have some sientific reasons. but it could be good as long if the posts are mature and not childish. but i think its quite valid. but its going places were we shouldn't go. delete or not to delete that is the question.
but i have a feeling that the mods aren't going to like this
but eloved aswell with thier owners life a she wolf's enterance would be in the back i think it would like a human's.
your right even though its a little ebarassing but does have some sientific reasons. but it could be good as long if the posts are mature and not childish. but i think its quite valid. but its going places were we shouldn't go. delete or not to delete that is the question.
but i have a feeling that the mods aren't going to like this
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2335
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:28 pm
- outwarddoodles
- Moderator
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 11:49 am
- Custom Title: I'm here! What more do you want?
- Gender: Female
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
Anubis: Theres been discussions like this before. As long as we take it maturely its perfectly okay.
I think 'realisticly' a werewolf would take on every trait of the wolf, changing every single little thing. Which means they'd be full wolf, and thus have full wolf male and female parts according to their gender. (DNA states whetehr a person is boy or girl right?I know theres the chromosomes X and Y but would DNA still satate gender?)
In what I want, I'd say I'd rather it say human and in the body, I don't want the uterus or the entrace into it to change as all. I can imagine as a gestalt it would be okay the same, being that the torso and the rear would remain more human shaped. I think the sexual parts can stay the same during wolf form, though I don't know about how the pee is going to come out.
O_o...okay, that last sentence I wrote just made me scared of this topic.
I think 'realisticly' a werewolf would take on every trait of the wolf, changing every single little thing. Which means they'd be full wolf, and thus have full wolf male and female parts according to their gender. (DNA states whetehr a person is boy or girl right?I know theres the chromosomes X and Y but would DNA still satate gender?)
In what I want, I'd say I'd rather it say human and in the body, I don't want the uterus or the entrace into it to change as all. I can imagine as a gestalt it would be okay the same, being that the torso and the rear would remain more human shaped. I think the sexual parts can stay the same during wolf form, though I don't know about how the pee is going to come out.
O_o...okay, that last sentence I wrote just made me scared of this topic.
"We are not always what we seem, and hardly ever what we dream."
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7572
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 3:17 pm
- Location: Zephyrhills, Florida
- Contact:
Hmm, I still think a werewolf have to have pysical half human traits to it, just thinking like a man is not enough, all that really is, is a wolf thats really smart. scientist in the near future can genitcly enhance the intelegents of a regular wolf, to have the knowledge of man, would you call that a werewolf.
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. - Thomas Jefferson
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
Shadowblaze wrote:Actually, we'cve discussed this sort of stuff- just, keep it mature.
I wasn't aware that all thaw was all different- but i havent been staring at dogs' butts either. could you explain what's so diff?
Well, it kinda sticks out a bit. It's hard to explain. I don't know exactly what the structural differences are. If I was a female werewolf and I suddenly grew a canine vagina in my gestalt form, I'd feel really...weird.
- Lupin
- Legendary
- Posts: 6129
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:26 pm
- Custom Title: Ninja BOFH
- Gender: Male
- Location: 29°30.727'N 98°35.949'W
- Contact:
outwarddoodles wrote:I think 'realisticly' a werewolf would take on every trait of the wolf, changing every single little thing. Which means they'd be full wolf, and thus have full wolf male and female parts according to their gender. (DNA states whetehr a person is boy or girl right?I know theres the chromosomes X and Y but would DNA still satate gender?)
Yes. DNA pretty much controls everything. Fun Fact: You don't even need the full Y chromosome to produce maleness. In humans the SRY gene on the Y chromosome produces maleness. It's UBE1 on other mammals. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SRY)
Edit: VVVVV Some males have two X chromosomes, In that case the SRY gene was transfered from the Y chromosome to an X chromosome.
Last edited by Lupin on Sun Sep 25, 2005 8:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
More fun facts: Some males have an extra Y chromosome. They are taller and more aggressive than regular males.
Some males have an extra X chromosome: They can be hermaphroditic, and are generally very feminine (Kleinfelter's syndrome, I think that's what it's called)
Some females have an extra X chromosome (referred to as metafemales): There's not a whole lot about them that is special, as far as I know, other than they have a more difficult time conceiving.
There are other weird chromosomal occurences, but I've forgotten them.
Some males have an extra X chromosome: They can be hermaphroditic, and are generally very feminine (Kleinfelter's syndrome, I think that's what it's called)
Some females have an extra X chromosome (referred to as metafemales): There's not a whole lot about them that is special, as far as I know, other than they have a more difficult time conceiving.
There are other weird chromosomal occurences, but I've forgotten them.
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
Actually, here's some more accurate info: http://biology.about.com/od/basicgeneti ... 10504a.htm
- Black Shuck
- Legendary
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:55 pm
- Custom Title: Professional Air Guitarist
- Location: Moab, Utah
- Contact:
I forgot about thatBlack Shuck wrote:I think human female anatomy would be better because the way dogs are, they can get some pretty sick stuff when they go into heat. I, personally, wouldn't want an infected uterus Thankfully humans don't have to deal that!
Ewwww.
I've turned off the reply notice for this topic. It looks kinda odd in my inbox.
- Black Shuck
- Legendary
- Posts: 586
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:55 pm
- Custom Title: Professional Air Guitarist
- Location: Moab, Utah
- Contact:
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 13085
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 5:27 am
- Custom Title: Executive Producer (Red Victoria)
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tejas
Re: Werewolf Genitalia
Excelsia wrote:Yeah, this is a rather uncomfortable topic, sorry.
So, most people seem to be of the opinion that male werewolves would have sheaths, and I think that makes sense.
But what about female werewolves? Would they retain their human genitalia, or develop canine genitalia? It would make more sense for them to have canine ones, simply because the males do. However, I've owned dogs for years and female dog genitals are not pretty by any stretch of the imagination.
Perhaps they could be located lower than a human female's, so that even if they were canine, you couldn't see them.
Thoughts?
(This doesn't necessarily apply to Freeborn...it can just be your general opinion.)
You bring up odd topics. You know that, dont'cha?
Ok, here is what I think.
Cover it up with extra fur.
If not fur, don't show that part on the big screen.
How easy was that? Plain and simple.
Now excuse me while I chew on some duckies.
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
Morkulv wrote:Male werewolves having sheets?
LOL, sheets. Sorry, I know what you mean, but that was funny.
I think it's an issue that needs to be addressed, perhaps. Up until now, I've always been thinking female werewolves would have human genitalia, and it would be covered in fur, and therefore not visible. I suppose it's simplest just to go that route, since using female canine genitalia would just be weird.
Personally, the way werewolves are in my own perceptions, the genitals of the male are mixed, with the canine sheath and knot, but the placement of it between the legs human-style instead of riding up the belly like a dog (look at any anthro-wolf nude to understand this)
As for the female, it too is mixed, but, unlike the male, which favors the canine side over the human one, the female is the reverse, favoring the human over the canine - the overal form is a human one, but the clitoris is a bit larger, and the labia are a bit thicker and 'puffy', in resemblance to the canine females 'protruding' genitals.
All of this, mind you, is somewhat easily concealed by the moderately-thick layer of fur masking the outline of such things, which, unaroused, only makes the males have a slight bulge, and the females a smooth groin - unless you look at them from directly underneath. But you better be DAMN good friends with her before trying that kind of viewpoint.
And, just to round up the other gender-anatomy related question - in my perception, the breasts are smaller than the human form by roughly a full cup-size due to fat being redistributed - D becomes C, C becomes B, etc. Like their full wolf forms, they do possess the extra nipples, but mostly are hidden by fur, with only the 'human' breasts protruding.
As for the female, it too is mixed, but, unlike the male, which favors the canine side over the human one, the female is the reverse, favoring the human over the canine - the overal form is a human one, but the clitoris is a bit larger, and the labia are a bit thicker and 'puffy', in resemblance to the canine females 'protruding' genitals.
All of this, mind you, is somewhat easily concealed by the moderately-thick layer of fur masking the outline of such things, which, unaroused, only makes the males have a slight bulge, and the females a smooth groin - unless you look at them from directly underneath. But you better be DAMN good friends with her before trying that kind of viewpoint.
And, just to round up the other gender-anatomy related question - in my perception, the breasts are smaller than the human form by roughly a full cup-size due to fat being redistributed - D becomes C, C becomes B, etc. Like their full wolf forms, they do possess the extra nipples, but mostly are hidden by fur, with only the 'human' breasts protruding.
Last edited by ChaosWolf on Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Werewolf Code!:
WWC1.0 SSHb LNAn SPDbsh SILt WTRn GDRs UNQd EATafvy SGNepcy SPKw STCb WLL+ HRT++ DLY+++++ STY+++++ INT0 RGN+ JMP+ STR+ BIG+ COL++ AGE+ CMN- AGL+ IRT+ EYE+ FUR+
WWC1.0 SSHb LNAn SPDbsh SILt WTRn GDRs UNQd EATafvy SGNepcy SPKw STCb WLL+ HRT++ DLY+++++ STY+++++ INT0 RGN+ JMP+ STR+ BIG+ COL++ AGE+ CMN- AGL+ IRT+ EYE+ FUR+
- Wolveblade
- Legendary
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:14 pm
- Custom Title: lone wolf
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
That could work.ChaosWolf wrote:Personally, the way werewolves are in my own perceptions, the genitals of the male are mixed, with the canine sheath and knot, but the placement of it between the legs human-style instead of riding up the belly like a dog (look at any anthro-wolf nude to understand this)Excelsia wrote:I think it's an issue that needs to be addressed, perhaps. Up until now, I've always been thinking female werewolves would have human genitalia, and it would be covered in fur, and therefore not visible. I suppose it's simplest just to go that route, since using female canine genitalia would just be weird.
As for the female, it too is mixed, but, unlike the male, which favors the canine side over the human one, the female is the reverse, favoring the human over the canine - the overal form is a human one, but the clitoris is a bit larger, and the labia are a bit thicker and 'puffy', in resemblance to the canine females 'protruding' genitals.
All of this, mind you, is somewhat easily concealed by the moderately-thick layer of fur masking the outline of such things, which, unaroused, only makes the males have a slight bulge, and the females a smooth groin.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7572
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 3:17 pm
- Location: Zephyrhills, Florida
- Contact:
- Aki
- Legendary
- Posts: 2595
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:06 pm
- Custom Title: Wolfblood
- Gender: Male
- Location: Massachusetts
I have to agree with that...ChaosWolf wrote:Personally, the way werewolves are in my own perceptions, the genitals of the male are mixed, with the canine sheath and knot, but the placement of it between the legs human-style instead of riding up the belly like a dog (look at any anthro-wolf nude to understand this)
As for the female, it too is mixed, but, unlike the male, which favors the canine side over the human one, the female is the reverse, favoring the human over the canine - the overal form is a human one, but the clitoris is a bit larger, and the labia are a bit thicker and 'puffy', in resemblance to the canine females 'protruding' genitals.
All of this, mind you, is somewhat easily concealed by the moderately-thick layer of fur masking the outline of such things, which, unaroused, only makes the males have a slight bulge, and the females a smooth groin - unless you look at them from directly underneath. But you better be DAMN good friends with her before trying that kind of viewpoint.
.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 3203
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Mood: Meh...
- Location: Where soul meets body
I'm kindof afraid to ask, but how is a female canines 'area' different from a human females 'area'? We never had a female dog before, so I really have no idea....
And will the placement of each sex's bits in gestalt form be, you know.. right for each other. Mating from behind would only work with sheaths I think, and I dont know if it'll matter where the females 'area' is.
....*disturbed myself*...
And will the placement of each sex's bits in gestalt form be, you know.. right for each other. Mating from behind would only work with sheaths I think, and I dont know if it'll matter where the females 'area' is.
....*disturbed myself*...