Examples how NOT to do it!

This is the place for discussion and voting on various aspects of werewolf life, social ideas, physical appearance, etc. Also a place to vote on how a werewolf should look.
Moonstalker
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Finland

Examples how NOT to do it!

Post by Moonstalker »

Everybody has seen a werewolf movie with a reaction "oh please, not like this!" :P

I watched The Howling just a few minutes ago and I had that kinda reaction. The werewolves were two legged rats and their fur looked like they live in sewers. Not to mention the shifting was probaply the most ugliest thing I've ever seen. I understand the movie ain't very new but I think it is a perfect example for what the Freeborn shouldn't be.

More examples or ideas for this topic? :D
In darkness I travel
In shadows I walk

Guided by the beast in me...
User avatar
Scott Gardener
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 4731
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:36 pm
Gender: Male
Mood: Excited
Location: Rockwall, Texas (and beyond infinity)
Contact:

Grrr...

Post by Scott Gardener »

For it's time, though, The Howling was pretty influential. Right up to 1981, when it came out, we were had decades of Lon Chaney look-alikes. The Howling laid important groundwork for the Gestalt form we know and love today--digitigrade stance, extended muzzles, pointy ears, and a lot of other things we take for granted. The problems you're seeing is mainly because special effects in 1981 didn't have CGI or quite as massive studio effects branches to back it up. Granted, American Werewolf in London came out that same year, and its special effects in terms of shifting remains a benchmark standard today.

Still, you young whipper-snappers have no idea how important some of these works are. Kids these days, calling the original Star Wars slow-paced, with cheesy effects...
Taking a Gestalt approach, since it's the "in" thing...
User avatar
Fullmoonstar
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 2464
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 2:06 pm
Custom Title: ...for science
Gender: Male
Location: Teramar

Re: Grrr...

Post by Fullmoonstar »

Scott Gardener wrote:For it's time, though, The Howling was pretty influential. Right up to 1981, when it came out, we were had decades of Lon Chaney look-alikes. The Howling laid important groundwork for the Gestalt form we know and love today--digitigrade stance, extended muzzles, pointy ears, and a lot of other things we take for granted. The problems you're seeing is mainly because special effects in 1981 didn't have CGI or quite as massive studio effects branches to back it up. Granted, American Werewolf in London came out that same year, and its special effects in terms of shifting remains a benchmark standard today.

Still, you young whipper-snappers have no idea how important some of these works are. Kids these days, calling the original Star Wars slow-paced, with cheesy effects...
I totally have to agree with that... The Howling was a very important, influential Movies for most of the Werewolffilms...
Image
never stop dreaming. Otherwise your dreams will never come true.
User avatar
Black Claw
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:46 am
Custom Title: The Hidden Archer
Gender: Male
Mood: Excited
Location: Oklahoma

Post by Black Claw »

Yeah, i'll tell another werewolf movie i think was good, Bad Moon. :shift: :howl:  :oo
I am the guardian of the light and darkness,
I am the one who whispers in the dark,
I am the eyes of your soul,
I am the shield,
I am the sword.
User avatar
Howlitzer
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 486
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:57 pm
Custom Title: yradnegeL
Gender: Male
Location: Places
Contact:

Re: Grrr...

Post by Howlitzer »

Scott Gardener wrote:
Still, you young whipper-snappers have no idea how important some of these works are. Kids these days, calling the original Star Wars slow-paced, with cheesy effects...
Hey, I respect The Howling and AWIL....especially AWIL.

but I'm not gonna lie....I unburied some VHS copies of the original Star Wars last summer, having only vaguely remembered watching them when I was like 6.....And I remembered them being slightly better than they seemed upon watching them again.
User avatar
MattSullivan
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 1480
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 6:54 am
Location: AMERICA, bitches! :P

Post by MattSullivan »

Young kids these days all have ADD. That's why they would see STAR WARS as "slow" Yeesh.

But you guys have to remember 98% of the world still sees the Werewolf film as horror. They are not part of this board. The werewolf fandom in but a small microcosm of pop culture. it's gonna take that ONE good character driven werewolf film with APPEALLING looking lycanthropes to really win over that crowd.


In the meantime, the HOWLING is a classic horror film on its own, if you try to look part the fact that the werewolf isn't "pretty"
Image
User avatar
Howlitzer
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 486
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:57 pm
Custom Title: yradnegeL
Gender: Male
Location: Places
Contact:

Post by Howlitzer »

MattSullivan wrote:Young kids these days all have ADD
<crazed rant> Young kids are SUPPOSED to have ADD! Gah! :x

Ritalin...pshhhh.... :roll:

I should be the one to talk....I was caught in the ADD scare and a pediatrician (who should be shot btw) pretty much forced my parents into putting me on Ritalin at the age of 6, followed by numerous other ADD medications....and it took until 4th grade to have a doctor conclude that I did *not* have ADD, but that like any small child I had a less-than-exemplary attention span.

Here's what happened: The Ritalin worked for about 2 weeks, then completely backfired. The other meds worked for similar periods of time, then completely backfired. Among other things I apparently had hallucinations, really disturbing nightmares on a regular basis, had short term blackouts, and now I have pretty much blocked out all of elementary school save for a few random memories that confirm most of the weird crap that people say happened when I was going through this.

So...mess with their brain chemistry and put a kid through THAT, or simply put up with their short attention span until they grow out of it
</crazed rant>

sorry....touchy subject with me.


back to the movies >.<
Irish Wolf
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:08 pm
Custom Title: Sneezy
Gender: Female
Mood: Meh...
Location: If I told you...well let's just say it wouldn't be good
Contact:

Post by Irish Wolf »

MattSullivan wrote:Young kids these days all have ADD. That's why they would see STAR WARS as "slow" Yeesh.
I'm 13 and when i watched A New Hope i never thought it was slow paced.

Moving on. I know that Harry Potter isn't a werewolf movie but still the comb-over werewolf was horrible.
User avatar
Kelpten
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2005 7:23 pm

Post by Kelpten »

MattSullivan wrote:But you guys have to remember 98% of the world still sees the Werewolf film as horror. They are not part of this board. The werewolf fandom in but a small microcosm of pop culture. it's gonna take that ONE good character driven werewolf film with APPEALLING looking lycanthropes to really win over that crowd.
Ya, what Matt said. Freeborn is the first movie made by werewolf fans that want something very different. If we do it right, we'll completely reset the peramiters of the the genre. The closest werewolf movie I can think of to freeborn was Blood and Chocolate, but even there the werewolves were evil, and only the main character was an exception.

But special effects are important, since they can make or break a movie in today's high expectaions. But at the same time, let's not forget the importance of plot (Star wars episode 1 had great effects, but no plot or characterization or acting or...)
Moonstalker
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Finland

Post by Moonstalker »

MattSullivan wrote:Young kids these days all have ADD. That's why they would see STAR WARS as "slow" Yeesh.

But you guys have to remember 98% of the world still sees the Werewolf film as horror. They are not part of this board. The werewolf fandom in but a small microcosm of pop culture. it's gonna take that ONE good character driven werewolf film with APPEALLING looking lycanthropes to really win over that crowd.


In the meantime, the HOWLING is a classic horror film on its own, if you try to look part the fact that the werewolf isn't "pretty"
Actually I've never seen a werewolf movie where the werewolf was "pretty". At this far closest is in Van Helsing, though it ain't best as it could be. Anyway it is best at this far.
In darkness I travel
In shadows I walk

Guided by the beast in me...
User avatar
Night_Hunter
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:51 pm
Custom Title: My cross to bare
Contact:

Post by Night_Hunter »

true

there should be more movies where the werewolves should look cool

but i think they aren't because werewolves in movies are never portrayed as the good guys or the heroes. Then they show them as monsters ugly, mindless killing monsters.

8)
OH FOR GOD'S SAKE YOU HAVE RABIES TOO ?!!?

Read my stuff at:
http://nightfiction.blogspot.com/
User avatar
MattSullivan
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 1480
Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 6:54 am
Location: AMERICA, bitches! :P

Post by MattSullivan »

Thing is, even among PACK members there's disagreement over what constitutes "cool looking" It'll take the "Star Wars" of lycanthrope films to fix this. Something even non-werewolf fans can watch and say, "Damn, that was a cool movie"
Image
Moonstalker
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Finland

Post by Moonstalker »

Night_Hunter wrote:true

there should be more movies where the werewolves should look cool

but i think they aren't because werewolves in movies are never portrayed as the good guys or the heroes. Then they show them as monsters ugly, mindless killing monsters.

8)
I understand this point: werewolves were originally monsters. Churh murdered countless people believing that they worked for satan and I guess this kinda stuck. In modern days when people use their head insted of believing everything they hear, weres have become more like a symbol and a reference for power and freedom.
This evil werewolf thing is kinda closing to be drained out, for a change we might have our beautiful version of it. Perhaps this point of wiew will become popular some day :wink:
In darkness I travel
In shadows I walk

Guided by the beast in me...
User avatar
Verborgen Tierinmir
Pack Member
Pack Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 7:41 pm

Post by Verborgen Tierinmir »

I always find it funny how the legends and ideas evolve as people bring their different taked on it. I remember learning that L'oup Garu or (something to that spelling) was a true representation of werewolf lore. These lycans suffered a curse brought about by a pact between a man and the devil which was passed down a family through each males. And even thought the ww image has changed dramatically, especially after hollywood, it is still an image of horror or a representations of beasts.

The whole point of that paragraph was really for me to express how it seems that the pack will truly be a driving force for the way people think about lycans. I bet if werewolf could say anything it would be that its awesome to have fans like you guys since living with a curse is bad enough let alone being portrayed as something hideous.
A wolf may lose his teeth, but ne'er his nature. - Scottish proverb

Wolves do change their hair, but not their hearts. - Ben Johnson
User avatar
RedEye
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3400
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:45 pm
Custom Title: Master of Meh
Gender: Male
Mood: Meh...
Location: Somewhere between here and Wolf Bend, Montana.

Post by RedEye »

IMHO: In the old WW movies, and in most of the new ones, the Werewolf represents the OTHER. The different one. The alien. The "not like we are" person.

The Werewolf is the immigrant, who takes away the jobs we wouldn't do anyhow. The Werewolf is the foreigner.

So, since at heart we are still a tribal people, the Werewolf is the non-tribe person; who is ugly, destructive, who is dangerous ( for some reason or other) and who has to be driven out or killed.

That, in my opinion, is what the Werewolf really is...
And yes, we need a "Freeborn" or something like it, to challenge our responses to the non-tribe being. Freeborn is a lot more than just entertainment, it's medicine.
RedEye: The Wulf and writer who might really be a Kitsune...
User avatar
Berserker
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 1075
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:11 pm
Gender: Male
Location: GA

Post by Berserker »

RedEye wrote:And yes, we need a "Freeborn" or something like it, to challenge our responses to the non-tribe being. Freeborn is a lot more than just entertainment, it's medicine.
Ehh there have been movies and stories that tackle this issue for a long, long time... like the excellent The Iron Giant , Hellboy, and Monsters Inc., and even E.T. to some extent.

Now something specific to werewolves, on the other hand, is what Freeborn can provide.
Image
Dreamer
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 879
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 12:49 pm
Location: Tucson AZ

Re: Examples how NOT to do it!

Post by Dreamer »

Agreed Bezerker.

But what we also should avoid is making them a race of Mary Sues. Like Twilight vampires. Oh dear god, Twilight Vampires.
XIV
User avatar
Leonca~
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:26 pm
Custom Title: The Cat who walks by Herself
Gender: Female
Mood: Stressed
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Examples how NOT to do it!

Post by Leonca~ »

I need to see The Howling again. I saw it about 2 years ago or something like that, and all I remember is the kids at the end saying “Oh look, the news lady is turning into a werewolf.” Which I found hilarious. :lol:

Bad Moon is still one of my favorites. I’ve actually seen it more than almost any other werewolf movie. The costume isn’t so bad, but the transformation scene is just a terrible example of CGI. Ahh, cheesy goodness. :P

One of the things that makes me groan in movies or TV shows is when they take a minimalist approach. Maybe they have decent effects elsewhere, but when it comes time for the person to transform they get glowing red eyes and grow sharp teeth and claws and start growling. Lame. :roll:
Sombra avatar by Leopreston at deviantart.com
User avatar
Vagrant
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 716
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:50 am
Custom Title: Prolific Procrastinator
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Examples how NOT to do it!

Post by Vagrant »

Bloodyredbaron
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:34 pm
Custom Title: Undead Mutant Dinosaur
Gender: Male
Mood: Indifferent

Re: Examples how NOT to do it!

Post by Bloodyredbaron »

"I hope some animal never bores a hole in my head and lays its eggs in my brain, because later you might think you're having a good idea but it's just eggs hatching."
-Jack Handey
Wingman
Game Master
Game Master
Posts: 931
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:08 am
Custom Title: Dastardly ne'er-do-well in search of a lickspittle
Gender: Male
Location: Ye olde frozen northlands.

Re: Examples how NOT to do it!

Post by Wingman »

Bloodyredbaron wrote:To be perfectly frank, there is no wrong way to create a species of creatures in your own work of fiction, just ways you personally may like or dislike. I’ll tell you what I don’t like, when the curse is portrayed as tied to the progenitor.
Well, that type certain has it's places, such as if the progenitor is a spellcaster of kind and the spell dies with him. But yeah, it's kind of hard to figure out how they're all somehow mystically connected to some guy. It's a little like saying I'll die if my parents do, makes no sense when you look at it logically.
http://stevebot-7.deviantart.com/
Quod sumus hoc eritis

Aspirant writer-artist.
Lycanthrope
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 3:08 pm

Post by Lycanthrope »

I don't think that applying "logics" to Werewolves is the right approach. Not if we're trying to tell a story. If we're working within the scope of myths, we're actually forced to assume mystical thinking. From a non-mystical point of view, the existence of Werewolves and removing the affliction by killing the Sire make as much sense - none. Otherwise, however, we're dealing with symbols that can either be easy to relate to or not. Probably most people on the Message Boards feel affinity towards Werewolves for one reason or another. Most likely because they symbolise something they find compelling. Many, however, dislike the idea of removing the affliction by killing the Sire, because they don't find it convincing. Note that I didn't say "true" or "logical". What I mean is that it's an additional symbol that doesn't have the necessary appeal. For instance, if I understood it well, BloodyRedBaron said that removing the curse doesn't lead to any self discovery and battling one's inner demons, while it would "feel right". Other example - the possible concept of freedom is mixed with dependence on someone else - an unacceptable combination for someone who sees Lycanthropy as a mirror for freedom.

Obviously, a single symbol can be compelling for one person and repelling for another. I believe that very few symbols are inherently bad. They can be more or less likely to be used properly, but they could be, nevertheless.
Image
User avatar
Kaebora
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 4:51 pm
Custom Title: Werehare In Disguise
Gender: Male
Mood: RAR!
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Re: Grrr...

Post by Kaebora »

Scott Gardener wrote:Still, you young whipper-snappers have no idea how important some of these works are. Kids these days, calling the original Star Wars slow-paced, with cheesy effects...
Indeed. A friend told me that the original Battlestar Galactica was crap. In fact, the acting wasn't half bad, and it was one of the best Sci-Fi TV shows of its time. Without BG, there wouldn't have been a Star Wars, or a Star Trek.

The same can be said of the original Wolf Man. The effects showing the transformation were good back when it was made. Lets face it, the Wolf Man TF was still more impressive than the one in Blood and Chocolate (rainbowy effects or camera cuts hiding all the shifting).
Lurking softly, reading your posts, loving your ideas...
-Kaebora
Bloodyredbaron
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:34 pm
Custom Title: Undead Mutant Dinosaur
Gender: Male
Mood: Indifferent

Re:

Post by Bloodyredbaron »

Lycanthrope wrote:I don't think that applying "logics" to Werewolves is the right approach. Not if we're trying to tell a story. If we're working within the scope of myths, we're actually forced to assume mystical thinking. From a non-mystical point of view, the existence of Werewolves and removing the affliction by killing the Sire make as much sense - none. Otherwise, however, we're dealing with symbols that can either be easy to relate to or not. Probably most people on the Message Boards feel affinity towards Werewolves for one reason or another. Most likely because they symbolise something they find compelling. Many, however, dislike the idea of removing the affliction by killing the Sire, because they don't find it convincing. Note that I didn't say "true" or "logical". What I mean is that it's an additional symbol that doesn't have the necessary appeal. For instance, if I understood it well, BloodyRedBaron said that removing the curse doesn't lead to any self discovery and battling one's inner demons, while it would "feel right". Other example - the possible concept of freedom is mixed with dependence on someone else - an unacceptable combination for someone who sees Lycanthropy as a mirror for freedom.
You hit the nail on the head, dude. The curse being tied to the source basically means that if the werewolf who bits you fell off a cliff or got hit by a truck, then you’re free of the curse and there’s really no conflict. On the opposite end of the spectrum if you’re using your lycanthropy to save the world and you’re fighting the evil Vampire overlord to prevent him from plunging the world into darkness in South America and your sire slips on a sheet of ice and cracks open his skull in Maine, you’re screwed.

Making curing lycanthropy or vampirism (which is really where this whole thing started) as easy as shoving your sire in front of a train is a cop out.
"I hope some animal never bores a hole in my head and lays its eggs in my brain, because later you might think you're having a good idea but it's just eggs hatching."
-Jack Handey
User avatar
shiftergirl
Pack Leader
Pack Leader
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:06 am
Custom Title: alphness wolf of the moonlit pack
Location: Behind you
Contact:

Re: Examples how NOT to do it!

Post by shiftergirl »

ok, i know i haven't been on for a while, but decided it was time to come back.
so here is my opinion.

All movies made now are the bad ones, im 16 and remember many of the awsome kind of movies. i still watch movies like Jaws, star wars, Aliens and so forth. Those are the good movies. The moives today suck, they are all made with computers, no effects from hand made work, and i mean sweeting hand made work.

If you all remember, WW were never really bad, just the people that made them wanted them to be, so they could blaim things like murders and so forth on somthing other then human standards. Vampires were created the same way, WW's are not bad, just mistaken and changed to be that way. We humans or rather humans themselves made WW's bad for there own reasons.

Just my opinion now... :(
When i roar you run, When i purr you laugh, When i cry you weep.
Image
Image
Post Reply