Morkulv wrote:Now I'm starting to wonder if you've even seen the damn movie at all...
Yep! Sure did.
Morkulv wrote:Pride? What pride do I need to point out to you that a movie doesn't have to contain certain themes to be a genre-movie?
That's why I said "either pride or ignorance". Either you get what I'm saying but you don't want to admit to it, or what I'm saying is totally going over your head. So, which is it with you?
Morkulv wrote:Your not making much sense at all.
The feeling is mutual.
Morkulv wrote:Ignorance? Maybe you didn't notice, but I'm not the only one in this topic that is trying to make this point you know?
Yeah, so? I can say the same thing. I'm not the only one here who disagrees with you on what qualifies as a werewolf movie.
Morkulv wrote:Maybe you should pay some more attention to what is posted.
Maybe you should take some of your own advice. When I explained why I didn't think that Die Hard was a Christmas movie, your response was " I don't see you coming with any counterarguments as to why Die Hard 'IS' a Christmas movie".
Huh? I'm saying that I 'DON'T' think that Die Hard is a Christmas movie. Why would I say that and then come back and contradict myself by arguing otherwise?
Morkulv wrote:What kind of 'character development' did you see in Van Hellsing when it comes to the guy being a werewolf?
Him becoming a werewolf is the 'character development'. What part of that was difficult for you to understand?
Morkulv wrote: He even transformed only ONCE at the end of the movie, how can you call that characterdevelopment?? Please explain this to me
The amount of times it has happened is irrelevant. The bottom line is that it 'DID' happened. I can call it "character development" because V.Helsing is a 'character' in the movie. And since he didn't start off as a werewolf but became one later on, that qualifies as the 'development' part. Now do you get it?
Morkulv wrote:and don't start with your "he's a werewolf so therefore it has to be a werewolfmovie"-bullcrap again.
Is it bull crap because you don't agree with it? If so, doesn't that mean that everything you've been spouting so far qualifies as a big heaping steaming pile of the stuff?
Morkulv wrote:Post some valid arguments for a change.
I've been doing nothing but that. But like I've said before, your failure to recognize it (either because of pride or ignorance) is 'YOUR' problem.
Morkulv wrote:Saying "wrong" maybe your opinion, but it is a very childish one
You just don't get it do you? I've already told you why I chose to use that word.
Morkulv wrote:and it destroys any means for me to make a reply since I don't feel like having a discussion with a child.
So basically, unless I give you a long winded reply you're going to refuse to debate with me? Boo hoo! It seems to me that you're the one that's acting like a child.