Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

O Pianista · Post by **O Pianista** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 3:13 am

Just... wow...
http://www.wegame.com/watch/Diablo_III_Gameplay_Video/
http://www.wegame.com/watch/Diablo_3_Cinematic_Trailer/

Two decades have passed since the demonic denizens, Diablo, Mephisto, and Baal, wandered the world of Sanctuary in a vicious rampage to shackle humanity into unholy slavery. Yet for those who battled the Prime Evils directly, the memory fades slowly and the wounds of the soul still burn.

When Deckard Cain returns to the ruins of Tristram's Cathedral seeking clues to new stirrings of evil, a comet from the heavens strikes the very ground where Diablo once entered the world. The comet carries a dark omen in its fiery being and it calls the heroes of Sanctuary to defend the mortal world against the rising powers of the Burning Hells — and even the failing luminaries of the High Heavens itself.

outwarddoodles · Post by **outwarddoodles** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:09 pm

I haven't even heard of this!

I thought Blizzard was too busy working on Starcraft 2.

*excitement*

O Pianista · Post by **O Pianista** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 2:26 pm

I've just seen Cain histories. Making three games at the same time it's quite hard, I think they should stop World Of Warcraft: The Wrath of the Lich king and start making diablo 3. Warcraft histories are making me sick... I'm waiting for Diablo 3 about several years.

There are two classes in progress...
Witch Doctor
&
Barbarian

Konietzko · Post by **Konietzko** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 4:43 pm

O Pianista wrote:I've just seen Cain histories. Making three games at the same time it's quite hard, I think they should stop World Of Warcraft: The Wrath of the Lich king and start making diablo 3.

Except World of Warcraft players are making it possible for you to have Diablo 3. Think of it like this. D3 is going to be one shot. Blizzard will get the money from a D3 player only once. WoW players are their cash cow. they get the initial money for buying the game and the expansions, *plus*....another $15 a month from about 10,000,000 accounts. You have to figure this, they're darn sure not spending 15 million dollars a month on server upkeep or building Wrath of the Lich King.

Berserker · Post by **Berserker** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 5:17 pm

When Diablo 3 comes out, I may never play WoW again.

O Pianista · Post by **O Pianista** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:19 am

how many weeks to make that gameplay demo? got any idea?

Short Tail · Post by **Short Tail** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 2:30 pm

A playable demo is still a long time out if at all. Other than WoW I dont remember having demos of any other blizzard game; and the only reason they had it for WoW was to get people addicted to it so they would pay the monthly fees.

O Pianista · Post by **O Pianista** » Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:20 pm

Wow Barbarian death scene is amazing

Berserker · Post by **Berserker** » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:45 pm

I hope they bring the Druid back. I hope the Druid can turn into a werewolf. And I hope the werewolf is realistic and awesome.

cjkrythos · Post by **cjkrythos** » Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:36 pm

Konietzko wrote:
O Pianista wrote:I've just seen Cain histories. Making three games at the same time it's quite hard, I think they should stop World Of Warcraft: The Wrath of the Lich king and start making diablo 3.
Except World of Warcraft players are making it possible for you to have Diablo 3. Think of it like this. D3 is going to be one shot. Blizzard will get the money from a D3 player only once. WoW players are their cash cow. they get the initial money for buying the game and the expansions, *plus*....another $15 a month from about 10,000,000 accounts. You have to figure this, they're darn sure not spending 15 million dollars a month on server upkeep or building Wrath of the Lich King.

Wait, are you telling me that WOW charges a separate monthly fee for every update that you buy? Meaning that if you bought the original game plus 2 updates, you would have to pay 3 times the normal monthly fee? If thats the case, I deffinitely aint getting a copy of WOW.

Descendent of a Druid · Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:11 pm

cjkrythos wrote:
Konietzko wrote:
O Pianista wrote:I've just seen Cain histories. Making three games at the same time it's quite hard, I think they should stop World Of Warcraft: The Wrath of the Lich king and start making diablo 3.
Except World of Warcraft players are making it possible for you to have Diablo 3. Think of it like this. D3 is going to be one shot. Blizzard will get the money from a D3 player only once. WoW players are their cash cow. they get the initial money for buying the game and the expansions, *plus*....another $15 a month from about 10,000,000 accounts. You have to figure this, they're darn sure not spending 15 million dollars a month on server upkeep or building Wrath of the Lich King.
Wait, are you telling me that WOW charges a separate monthly fee for every update that you buy? Meaning that if you bought the original game plus 2 updates, you would have to pay 3 times the normal monthly fee? If thats the case, I deffinitely aint getting a copy of WOW.

No they don't charge for each expansion. You only have to pay for the expansion once but the original WoW game is the initial fee (i think $20 now, or $15 if you buy the WoW/Burning Crusade battle chest) plus $15 for each month after the first.

O Pianista · Post by **O Pianista** » Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:31 am

We are going to pay per mounth $15 like WoW?

Descendent of a Druid · Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:51 pm

No i don't think the online multiplayer for Diablo 3 has a monthly fee.
And does anyone know when this things coming out anyway?

Whisperwind · Post by **Whisperwind** » Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:11 pm

Descendent of a Druid wrote: And does anyone know when this things coming out anyway?

nope, still just TBA

*sighs*

IndianaJones · Post by **IndianaJones** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:38 pm

Diablo III: TBA late holiday 2009 or 2010?!

Starcraft II (Going to be a crappy game, I hope so): TBA mid 2009?

After Activision merged with Blizzard. I don't like Blizzard now and I hate Activision for making stupid decisions for them.

I'm neutral with EA, because they did indeed improve the Command & Conquer franchise as Westwood intend to be.

Berserker · Post by **Berserker** » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:50 pm

Ummm what's wrong with Blizzard? And what's wrong with Starcraft II? Both Diablo III and Starcraft II look fantastic.

Descendent of a Druid · Mon Feb 02, 2009 7:45 am

I am depressed that they haven't mentioned a nature based spell caster, like the druid in the last game.

Chelenn · Post by **Chelenn** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:47 pm

Konietzko wrote:
O Pianista wrote:I've just seen Cain histories. Making three games at the same time it's quite hard, I think they should stop World Of Warcraft: The Wrath of the Lich king and start making diablo 3.
Except World of Warcraft players are making it possible for you to have Diablo 3. Think of it like this. D3 is going to be one shot. Blizzard will get the money from a D3 player only once. WoW players are their cash cow. they get the initial money for buying the game and the expansions, *plus*....another $15 a month from about 10,000,000 accounts. You have to figure this, they're darn sure not spending 15 million dollars a month on server upkeep or building Wrath of the Lich King.

Not to mention european accounts. I thought they used our money to finance their new jaguars...

Sebiale · Post by **Sebiale** » Sat May 02, 2009 11:06 pm

Home Site
Since no-one else posted this yet.

THE PACK Message Boards

Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re:

Re: Re:

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )

Re:

Re: Diablo 3 ( Isn't a Fake ! )