Not necisarily. tails doesnt make a werewolf believable, if for any regular (nonwerewolf fan) movie goer they may think its rediculous. For me the Van Helsing werewolf looked great, a tail wouldnt really have made that much of a difference, even though it probably would have looked better.RedEye wrote:Wolves have tails, so why not their cousins, the Werewolves? We humans DO have tails as we develop in the womb, but after a point we grow and it stops.
If Were's don't have fully articulated Big Toes, then they really need
tails for balance and manuvering.
Try this: Take any of the Werewolf Avatars here, and delete the tail by covering it. The picture loses half its impact.
Imagine Figarou sans tail. Pathetic! Were's need to have tails, or they're just not believable.
And Vuldari, I recent that ugly werewolf comment. I dont know every time I see someone say Ugly werewolves I automaticaly think they have my underworld werewolf images in thier heads because mostly everyone in here doesnt like the underworld lycans, and I know you like them too Vuldari.
Underworld Lycans are one of my favorite werewolves out there.