female shifting...

Moon Daughter · Post by **Moon Daughter** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:21 pm

Personally, I think that female werewolves shifting to gestalt form would go with the wolf traditional of having multiple nipple, but with a slight twist.

Say like one girl has like C-cups. I think that, when changing, their breast would not only become covered by fur, but tighten slighy and not hang that loose at all. It would become, in size, more like a B-cup or something. Then, normal wolf-like nipples would become present under the original breasts.

That's atleast how I see it. Otherwise, like someone said before, you'd just have some werewolf looking like it's hauling a bunch of coconuts.

Kirk Hammett · Post by **Kirk Hammett** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 1:25 am

You cannot run on all fours (toes and hands) with huge boobs. I got too old and big in the chest to run on all fours when I hit puberty, and Im not a big girl, I just have an unfortunately large chest. (Until after Ive had babies

).
Ive got bad back problems. Not all of it is from carrying a guitar onstage for hours. My guitar is light anyway it's not like it's a Gibson Les Paul.

So I vote flat chested realistically, and multiple nipples sort of under the fur I guess. Boobs that DO distinguish female from male, but certainly not big flabby things that are unecessary.

For all the reasons already stated on this board.

Kirk Hammett · Post by **Kirk Hammett** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:07 pm

Anook wrote:I totally agree with you.

But remember a werewolf would beable to tell if another werewolf was female or male, by their scent.

Right?

Yeah I agree with that

EDIT: Am I tripping out or did Anook's post vanish? Bah!

RedEye · Post by **RedEye** » Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:36 pm

Not only would it chafe like hades in four wheel drive, and be terrible going through dry brush, but the mass would make taking corners difficult in the extreme (especially if they shifted in the turn).

Anook · Post by **Anook** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:17 am

Kirk Hammett wrote:Yeah I agree with that

EDIT: Am I tripping out or did Anook's post vanish? Bah!

OOOPS! Sorry!

I deleted my post eariler. I didn't think anyone would respond, so I deleted it.

Sorry about that Kirk.

Anyways, I put it back up.

Kirk Hammett wrote:So I vote flat chested realistically, and multiple nipples sort of under the fur I guess. Boobs that DO distinguish female from male, but certainly not big flabby things that are unecessary.

I totally agree with you.

But remember a werewolf would beable to tell if another werewolf was female or male, by their scent.

Right?

So therefore breast wouldn't need to show.
I pictured female werewolves looking like this one on the right.

Kirk Hammett · Post by **Kirk Hammett** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 10:16 pm

RedEye wrote:Not only would it chafe like hades in four wheel drive, and be terrible going through dry brush, but the mass would make taking corners difficult in the extreme (especially if they shifted in the turn).

Haha that just made me laugh

I love that picture Anook, I still want to order the print of the Autumn Jester!

Anook · Post by **Anook** » Fri Jul 28, 2006 11:15 pm

I like the Breath of Winter, Da Woo, Eyes of the Night, Vantage Point, Redwood Pack, and There With You.

As you can see, I like alot of Golden wolfs artwork.

Fastenjaw · Post by **Fastenjaw** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 12:26 am

Set wrote:The multiple nipples thing always reminds me of this picture:

That photo is wrong... They are half wolf half man. They should have 4 nipples....

Vuldari · Post by **Vuldari** » Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:04 pm

Fastenjaw wrote:
Set wrote:The multiple nipples thing always reminds me of this picture:

That photo is wrong... They are half wolf half man. They should have 4 nipples....

Oh?

...that is an interesing opinion, but only one possible interpretation...

Be careful about telling others that thier own personal ideas on an interpretation of a fantasy character are "WRONG". No-one is really right or wrong when the creature we are talking about is a work of creative fiction.

I learned that lesson the hard way. ...as I've pissed off more than a few people by presenting what I believed to be the most 'Logical' interpretation to be the "RIGHT" one, and what I felt to be 'Illogical' to be "WRONG".

...BIG Mistake...

Just be careful and courteous, and we'll all be fine.

Well...now that You've been grilled by Vuldari (That's me), all you need to to is get beaned by a rubber duck by our "official" duckie throwing 'Pack Representative' Figarou and then I think you'll officially be part of the group here.

Welcome 'Fastenjaw'!

Cavman · Post by **Cavman** » Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:04 pm

OK, I'm gonna state my opinionso I hope that no one gets offended...

The gestalt form is suposed to be a conglomeration of human and wolf traits, so would the body have to fit with the scenario that the mind followed aswaell. I'm not saying the mind dose, but the body would probably change along those lines as if it did. Meaning, the identification of the opposite gender would also be a mix of both species, sent for wolf and sight for human. I'm not sayiong over exagerate anything, just have enough so its noticable. Ok, thats my opinion.

Fastenjaw · Post by **Fastenjaw** » Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:30 pm

Vuldari wrote:
Fastenjaw wrote:
Set wrote:The multiple nipples thing always reminds me of this picture:

That photo is wrong... They are half wolf half man. They should have 4 nipples....
Oh?

...that is an interesing opinion, but only one possible interpretation...

Be careful about telling others that thier own personal ideas on an interpretation of a fantasy character are "WRONG". No-one is really right or wrong when the creature we are talking about is a work of creative fiction.

I learned that lesson the hard way. ...as I've pissed off more than a few people by presenting what I believed to be the most 'Logical' interpretation to be the "RIGHT" one, and what I felt to be 'Illogical' to be "WRONG".

...BIG Mistake...

Just be careful and courteous, and we'll all be fine.

Well...now that You've been grilled by Vuldari (That's me), all you need to to is get beaned by a rubber duck by our "official" duckie throwing 'Pack Representative' Figarou and then I think you'll officially be part of the group here.

Welcome 'Fastenjaw'!

Doh! My bad. *slaps self on the head with notebook*

RedEye · Post by **RedEye** » Tue Aug 01, 2006 12:14 am

There is something besides breast development to consider...females tend (most of the time) to be Smaller, Lighter weight, and more Gracile in construction. This is not just a human thing, it goes throughought the whole animal kingdom (and when it doesn't, it really doesn't).
So, Female werewolves would be just like their Human Bases: somewhat smaller, more Graceful in structure, and prone to networking a lot....

shadow_wolf56979 · Post by **shadow_wolf56979** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 4:27 pm

Finally! Something I can answer freely! It depends on if you were bitten or born one. If she was born one, then it's just two nimples hidden under the fur where the breast would normally be. If she is bitten, then it's just two normal breasts. I heard that it gets in the way and it's very annoying. My friends just wear a big bikini or something so it's easier for them. I think I've said enough

Anook · Post by **Anook** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:58 pm

shadow_wolf56979 wrote: If she is bitten, then it's just two normal breasts. I heard that it gets in the way and it's very annoying. My friends just wear a big bikini or something so it's easier for them. I think I've said enough

What?

Why would a female werewolf have normal breast if she were bitten and ones that are born just have the little nipples under the fur?

Why aren't they the same?

shadow_wolf56979 · Post by **shadow_wolf56979** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:33 pm

It's because if she's bitten, then her bloodstream is not used to the shifting and her blood is not pure. If she was born it, then her blood is the purest and the shifted form is more like a wolf then human. If she's bitten, she's more human then wolf.

see what I mean?

Anook · Post by **Anook** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:39 pm

I guess I sort of see what you mean.

OH! I love the song on your website!

Its one of my favorites.

I mean, the dancing bears one.

shadow_wolf56979 · Post by **shadow_wolf56979** » Thu Aug 03, 2006 8:49 pm

That song? It's from Anastasia. It's an ok song. I'm glad you see what I'm talking about. Any more questions about lycanthropes in general, message me.

Shadow_in_the_Moonlight · Wed Oct 11, 2006 5:17 pm

would that also mean that in human form, a born were wolf would be hairier and have more a cute senses? maybe even sharper teeth and stronger nails? oh, and fastenjaw i back wuldari up on the "right and wrong" thing i have acually gotten into a fist fight because i said something along the lines of "I'M right, YOU'RE wrong, SHUT UP!". lol. not tryin to nag at ya, but be careful.

geekboy1500 · Post by **geekboy1500** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:26 pm

shadow_wolf56979 wrote: It's because if she's bitten, then her bloodstream is not used to the shifting and her blood is not pure. If she was born it, then her blood is the purest and the shifted form is more like a wolf then human. If she's bitten, she's more human then wolf. see what I mean?

so your saying your an ACTUAL WEREWOLF

Jamie · Post by **Jamie** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:09 pm

geekboy1500 wrote:
shadow_wolf56979 wrote: It's because if she's bitten, then her bloodstream is not used to the shifting and her blood is not pure. If she was born it, then her blood is the purest and the shifted form is more like a wolf then human. If she's bitten, she's more human then wolf. see what I mean?
so your saying your an ACTUAL WEREWOLF

It pretty much sounds like shadow_wolf56979 is making that claim, or is claiming to have direct knowlege of werewolves, or is just doing role-playing stuff.

Just so you know, shadow_wolf56979, the first one isn't really allowed on this board unless you provide proof (because it tends to derail conversations and offend people), the second one is generally considered somewhat naughty according to the rules of this board, and the last one is restricted to a special section of this board.

On this board, we aren't totally against the idea that werewolves might be real, but we prefer to keep the discussions speculative instead of allowing some individuals to present "the truth" to us. If you are claiming to be an actual werewolf, we aren't trying to offend you and we aren't trying to drive you away, it's just the way that the rules on this board have ended up being.

RedEye · Post by **RedEye** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:27 pm

Let's put things out in a simple manner. Werewolves, IF THEY EXISTED, would be in hiding, simply to survive. This is not a friendly world to anyone who's different, and being Were' would be Mega-Different.
Humanity has a history of "not playing well with others"; combine that "otherness" with being a legendary dangerous creature, and "does not play well" takes on a really nasty nature.
So, since the other people on this forum would be "Were-Friendly" to some degree, let us all agree that they don't exist, cannot exist, are just the stuff of legends...even if they actually were to exist, the most friendly thing we could do would be to agree that they exist only in the movies, or stories.
Basically, even if they existed, and some of us knew for a fact that they existed, the best thing we could do for them is to say THEY DON'T EXIST.
So...They don't exist. period. Even if they DO, they DON'T. It's called respect....

neoritter · Post by **neoritter** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:34 pm

Timber-WoIf wrote:i'm confused about this... female humans have breasts on thier chest, but wolves have the milk lower... and have more nipples. at what point in shifting would this actually happen? probibly after gestalt, but... eh, just food for thought?

This is somewhat sick that you are focusing on this. Let that be left to basic wolf anatomy etc. I would rather not have the movie being viewed explicit because a people felt seeing a female werewolf's boobs transform would be neat thing to do.

Zockereinstein · Post by **Zockereinstein** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:05 am

Well. I think that the answer of this topic is connected to the result of the transformation itself: if the result is a normal wolf look-a-like, then her breasts should be turned into wolfish ones. But if the result is something different, the process could take any possible path... do you agree?
Mmm, and I am sure that this won't be that important for the movie

.

And what do I prefer? For me it's the same.

howlbigbadwolf · Post by **howlbigbadwolf** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:23 pm

Ya ummm If my girlfriend turned in to a werewolf in front of me....Ummm i think i would be more turned on then scared....

That dosent make me a perv or wierd dose it..................(Why dose everyone keep looking At me like that)

(so you telling me that you would not do a werewolf girl if she was hot like hally berry huu huuu..) *scilence* What ever LOL

question · Post by **question** » Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:35 pm

Wolves have multiple teats as they have multiple pups. Are werewolves more likely to have multiple pups?

Even in any sort of fully shifted form a female werewolf is still a mother and would need to provide for her whelps. Given that humans have two breasts to support the normal one baby, I would say that the REAL question is what kind of birthing patterns werewolves have.

THE PACK Message Boards

female shifting...

Bib Chested Werewolves?

Re: Bib Chested Werewolves?

Put simply

Re: female shifting...

Quite simple.

Something to consider