Page 5 of 6
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 11:38 pm
by ChaosWolf
Jamie wrote:The length and presence of a penile bone would not matter as much to placement as you might think, for two reasons:
1) The entire arrangement is not parallel to the skin surface of the male, it is sunk into the abdomen at an angle. Therefore, you don't need to find seven inches of flat skin to place the "equipment" (which is one of the arguments people use for a mid-belly placement).
2) Most photographs I've seen of penile bones, they have at least some curvature, especially near one end. I'm not sure how curved the wolf bones are, but nothing I've seen so far is strictly straight.
2)
This help any?
Grey wolf baculum (penile bone)
http://www.skullsunlimited.com/graphics/tq-324-lg.jpg
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:30 pm
by JonathanBaine
penile bone and transformation....hmm. Maybe that's why the transformation hurts.....
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:23 pm
by Hamster
JonathanBaine wrote:penile bone and transformation....hmm. Maybe that's why the transformation hurts.....
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:17 pm
by ChaosWolf
Redifines the term "getting a boner".
Okay, I deserved that.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:53 am
by Marcwolf
A friend of mine who is an artist had draw his females in an interested way..
http://marcwolf.org/TEVKAF.JPG
The teats are moved to the belly but are not enlarged in the way a human female is (Sorry guys who like the big brested look), and the vulva is canid like with the opening downwards
This would also match the males appearance of having a canid type sheath on the belly and the penile position for intromission.
Just some viewpoints.
Take Care
Marcwolf
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:12 am
by Morkulv
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:15 am
by Marcwolf
Well
atleast a werewolf would NEVER need vi*gra...
He would ALWAYS have a boner!!!!
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:02 am
by Morkulv
The quality of the picture you posted is not very good.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:43 pm
by Anubis
Marcwolf wrote:Well
atleast a werewolf would NEVER need vi*gra...
He would ALWAYS have a boner!!!!
*hits Marcwolf with a rock*
BOO!!
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:41 am
by Figarou
Anubis wrote:Marcwolf wrote:Well
atleast a werewolf would NEVER need vi*gra...
He would ALWAYS have a boner!!!!
hits Marcwolf with a rock!!!
BOO!!
You're just as bad as he is.
http://calypso-blue.com/werewolf/viewto ... 1537#91537
http://calypso-blue.com/werewolf/viewto ... 7663#87663
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:05 am
by Morkulv
Owned!
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 8:29 am
by Marcwolf
Hey Figarou..
Do you actually keep a little black book noting who says what..
You seem to be pretty accurate keeping track of err.. mention of interesting acts and bodily parts/functions
Will these come back and haunt us in the form of rubber ducky nightmares?
<chuckles>
Marcwolf..
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:35 am
by Figarou
Marcwolf wrote:Hey Figarou..
Do you actually keep a little black book noting who says what..
When you moderate a forum, you keep track of everything. But not in a little black book.
Marcwolf wrote:
Will these come back and haunt us in the form of rubber ducky nightmares?
<chuckles>
Marcwolf..
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:39 am
by Anubis
....... ummm......ummmm
*kicks figarou in shins* BIG MEANIE!!! *runs away*
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:26 pm
by Figarou
Anubis wrote:
....... ummm......ummmm
*kicks figarou in shins* BIG MEANIE!!! *runs away*
Watch it!! You're messing with someone that can really ban you.
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 12:22 am
by RedEye
Marcwolf wrote:
http://marcwolf.org/TEVKAF.JPG
The teats are moved to the belly but are not enlarged in the way a human female is (Sorry guys who like the big brested look), and the vulva is canid like with the opening downwards
This would also match the males appearance of having a canid type sheath on the belly and the penile position for intromission.
Just some viewpoints.
Take Care
Marcwolf
Now this makes some sense, but only in the full, rather than the Gestalt form...although, for females "well endowed", going to Four-Foot-Drive in Gestalt form would be rather painful after a very little while...chafing, don'cha'know. Perhaps something would happen with the "Micro-Shift" needed to go into Four-Foot-Drive to begin with.
Perhaps in the Gestalt form, there is some Sheath formation and Breast reduction as part of the shift, just to "keep things out of the way". You do realise that such a change would make the "Missionary Position" into Kink, and the "Wolf" position into the Normal method. Interesting!
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 1:01 pm
by ChaosWolf
"Honey... let's do it people-style tonight!"
"Ooh, you kinky little b****."
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:25 am
by whereismydemon
Hmm...a lot of this conversation depends on if your movie is going to be 'that' mature or if it will be more of a broader amount of audience that can veiw such a film. Are you aiming for an extreamly mature audience or just your general rated R or PG-13 horror movie audience?
if mature than i agree with chaos wolf about placement and censorship (if that is what the fur is for then don't add too much for the adult audience)
if you are aiming for the not adult only movie viewers then chaos wolf's placement would work, but you would need to keep the fur scale up a bit (stupid government censorship)
I am not disagreeing with anyone, or saying that these options and ideas are bad, all i am saying is that i don't know what rating you are trying to acheive here, and i have different views on both.
I am not against anyone's ideas/opinions. (just making that clear)
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:33 am
by ChaosWolf
whereismydemon wrote:Hmm...a lot of this conversation depends on if your movie is going to be 'that' mature or if it will be more of a broader amount of audience that can veiw such a film.
Actually, by now, I think this topic, like most of them in this forum, have passed beyond being just "for the movie". Most of the decisions about Freeborn have already been made.
By now, it seems we're mostly just writing our own mythology. The fact that our various discussions about werewolves and their behavior, physiology, origins and whatnot have a movie tie-in seems almost like a secondary issue.
We no longer are merely making the movie - we ARE the movie.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:47 am
by whereismydemon
Maybe you are right, but i still want to know what rating they are aiming for in this project. We're kinda left without a full plate of facts here.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 12:57 am
by ChaosWolf
whereismydemon wrote:Maybe you are right, but i still want to know what rating they are aiming for in this project. We're kinda left without a full plate of facts here.
I think we're aiming for an "R". Not for the sake of being gratuitous with sex and/or violence, but just to be on the safe side, since by virtue of having transformations and fighting, there will probably be more nudity and blood than a mere "PG-13" may permit.
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 3:12 am
by whereismydemon
That makes things easier to think upon
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 5:45 pm
by geekboy1500
okkkk....
First of all (here comes the stupid question) what are the differences??
second of all for a excellent wel..... scene read Scott Gardners Lycanthrope (still cant spell) halfway through ch. 6
Link
http://www.geocities.com/jonlrabbit/lycanthrope.rtf
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:05 am
by Teenwolf
well, i think a mate would have the same things like a canine ( knot, sheath and so on) because a wolf (or werewolf) would look strange with human genitals.
But mostly of them is covered with fur. i think it would look strange when you walk on 2 legs and got a sheath at your belly pointing at everyone who s standing in front of you...
And femals would have canine genitals because male got also canine genitals....sounds logical for me....
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 7:14 am
by Morkulv
Please don't. No sheats, knots, or whatever.
Guys, this isn't a episode of Dr. Who.
