Page 6 of 7

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:04 pm
by Lupin
Figarou wrote:If the people who made Van Helsing knew that the werewolf fans loves werewolves with tails, they could've added one.
Too bad they didn't ask. Then we could have told them to fix the ears as well. :grinwiggle:

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:05 pm
by Silverclaw
Figarou wrote:If the people who made Van Helsing knew that the werewolf fans loves werewolves with tails, they could've added one.
Now if they only bothered to ask :P

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:12 pm
by Figarou
Lupin wrote:
Figarou wrote:If the people who made Van Helsing knew that the werewolf fans loves werewolves with tails, they could've added one.
Too bad they didn't ask. Then we could have told them to fix the ears as well. :grinwiggle:

yes, the ears was terrible on the 2nd werewolf in the film. It looked ok on the 1st one.

Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 7:31 pm
by kindar
Doruk Golcu wrote:
wolf marine wrote:i love the van helsing werewolf but one ploblem NO TAIL!!!!!!!
I think the Van helsing werewolves look the best, but yes, they could have used a tail and were a little too big maybe... Also, did you notice the last werewolf (the one VH turns into) being all huge and naked and furred, yet a piece of clothing magically reappearing to mask certain anatomical details whenever it turned back to human? :lol:
actually, the initial plans were to have Van helsen naked, turned so that you's see a part of his a** and nothing more, but at somepoint the people involved started getting worried that the audience would become distracted from the drama by the showing of flesh, so they added the torn clothing

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 10:53 pm
by greniar
Mine, from the film "Hunter/Slayer". a movie i wrote and was the F/X guy for. a buddy of mine was director.

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 11:59 pm
by Renorei
Van Helsing. He was as close to perfect as werewolf movies get. His face was fierce yet beautiful, his fangs were nice and long, he was the perfect size, he still managed to give off a humanish intelligence, his claws were great, his fur was wonderful...basically he was just awesome. He didn't look cartoony at all. The lack of a tail is unfortunate, but everything else about him makes up for it.

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:25 am
by Machine-Whisperer
pfffft. I don't believe this, Van helsing was such an overly macho movie;

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:28 pm
by Stone Wolf
The Van Helsing werewolf was (in my opinion) the best werewolf I've seen in any movie.. but the pointy ears were a little weird.. and I'm pretty sure there was a "tail" on him... it just wasn't realy big enough.. like a little stuble... you can barely see it....

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:30 pm
by Morkulv

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 5:40 pm
by Set
You're just a sore loser. :evil:

"But...but...Van Helsing was a cartoon! :cryeyesout: "

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:38 am
by Machine-Whisperer

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 4:30 pm
by greniar
greniar wrote:Mine, from the film "Hunter/Slayer". a movie i wrote and was the F/X guy for. a buddy of mine was director.
(Clerification)

my werewolf is better than Van Helsing's because it has a tail

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 5:41 pm
by Teenwolf
I loved the Van hellsing wolfie.... :D

He was big, very muskular, with beautifull claws and paws, his fur and his teeth were perfect.....only his ears were a little bit too long...and i didn`t see a tail... :P but thats not sooooo bad....he either looked verx sexy to me.....wish i was the girl in his arms..lol :lol:

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:58 pm
by Vuldari
I'm pretty sure I voted for the Van Helsing werewolf, mostly because it was the only one that didn't look like it was slapped with an ugly stick.

...but it was only a vote of approval for how it looked...not the movie overall.

Also...it was NOT an example of my ideal...just what I saw as the best of a collection of fairly to really-bad werewolves. (Speaking purely aestheticly) ...which is all that hollywood has served us over the years...

I liked the VH werewolf because it was the only one that wasn't ugly. ...at least not completely.

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 8:16 am
by Morkulv

Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2006 8:17 am
by Morkulv
Set wrote:You're just a sore loser. :evil:

"But...but...Van Helsing was a cartoon! :cryeyesout: "
I was commenting about the lack of poll-options, not the results.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:45 pm
by Shadow Wulf
For the last time the van helsing werewolf doesnt look like a cartoon. Plus I dont think you choosing the right words, mabey you mean artificial.

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:54 pm
by Morkulv

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:11 am
by Vuldari

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 11:51 am
by Lupin
er... you want 'moot' which means 'irrelevant'.

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:02 pm
by Vuldari
Lupin wrote:er... you want 'moot' which means 'irrelevant'.
Hmmm...

I can't say I've ever seen it written...only heard it spoken.

Thank you for the correction.

[edit: I don't know how I missed that]

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:49 pm
by Shadow Wulf
Vuldari wrote:That you for the correction.
er... you want thank "which means giving graditude towards someone". :lol:

I just love pulling your tail Vuldari

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:59 pm
by Figarou
Shadow Wulf wrote:
Vuldari wrote:That you for the correction.
er... you want thank "which means giving graditude towards someone". :lol:

I just love pulling your tail Vuldari

To bad you don't have a tail, Shadow Wulf. Otherwise Vuldari will be pulling on yours as well.

:D

Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:06 pm
by Shadow Wulf
Just one of them advantages about werewolves with no tail.

:D Image

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 3:07 am
by Figarou
And the disadvantage......

.....well, I'll let this picture speak for itself.

Image




Put some pants on!! BLEH!!! Image