Page 7 of 7
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 7:06 am
by Lukas
i rather enjoy my C&C generals and C&C generals zero hour, aslo i play a mod for bf1942 called Forgotten hope whiich is really good, and when im board i play navyfield which is a 100% free ww2 naval game thats very realistic
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:49 pm
by Timber-WoIf
C&C PWNS ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if only i had a comp that could run generals well....
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 6:02 pm
by Short Tail
I would still have to say that my favorite multiplay game is Counter Strike: Source for the simple reason that it is the only one I ever made money on while playing and earned sponsors. Others that I currently enjoy are Company of Heroes and SSBM
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:25 pm
by Shadow Wulf
Oh we have got to play CSS agients each other.
Do I have you on my freinds list on xfire?
Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:15 pm
by Short Tail
Shadow Wulf wrote:Oh we have got to play CSS agients each other.
Do I have you on my freinds list on xfire?
Dont think so, it is ban3. It will have to wait till thursday or so since that is when my new headphones should be in. (broke the onld ones)
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:32 pm
by nachoboy
Vuldari wrote:
Earthbound was an
AWESOME game.
( Of course...I've allready said that )
That game is living proof that a game does not need great graphics to ROCK. I did not play that game untill after I had been playing a tweaked version of Morrowind for over a year, and beaten both Fallout's at least twice each. (All Great games, BTW), and the graphical downgrade only bothered me for about half an hour...then I realised how trippy, and fun the game was and didn't care any more.
I've not had the opportunity to play ChronoTrigger yet.
StarFox 64 was allright...but the Original SNES game remains one of my top favorites to this day. It's hard to say why, but the original
still feels more exiting and satisying to play than any of the sequels so far. It was faster...it was harder...it was ahead of it's time...and the music was pretty good too.
yeah, i know, man. earthbound's graphics coulda been better, but who cares?! that game was not only rockin awesome, but DUDE was it trippy!
ah, man, you gotta play chronotrigger. oh! what a great game... awesome storyline, okay graphics, many many characters, 15 or so different endings, and much, much more. that may very well rank above earthbound or those other games i said.
good point. the one for the snes was prolly better than the n64 one. but man, was it hard!
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:31 pm
by Vuldari
nachoboy wrote:good point. the one for the snes was prolly better than the n64 one. but man, was it hard!
Alot of people say StarFox 64 was the best...but I never really felt the same way about it as the first game. SF64 felt dumbed-down to me somehow...and the fact that the ships fly slower, and the bombs are less powerful drives me nuts.
You're right. The original game WAS hard. I usually win when I take the easiest path, and finish about 40% of the time when I take the middle path, but I don't think I've ever successfully beaten the end boss on the hardest path. ...if I even make it that far.
I plan to play ChronoTrigger eventually. I wonder if it will be made available for the Wii's 'Virtual Console'? ...otherwise, I know it has been re-released on PS2 (I think), and I can allways search online for an original copy.
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:53 pm
by nachoboy
yeah, they did make it for the ps2, and that version came with some bonus features r something. i never played that one yet. i just played the old snes version.