Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 2:25 pm
whoop! i thought you were someone else. hehe... 
This is a tough one to answer as most people do not specifically fit just one class of warrior. Also, it's difficult to judge yourself; at the Mike Reed web forum, a lot of posters proudly proclaimed themselves to be Kung-Fu Masters or Big Dogs, but once in battle turned out to be mostly Composts, Allcaps and Crybabys.
Hmm... Well, first and foremost, whenever in direct flame warfare, I try to exploit every weakness, fallacy and example of total stupidity I can find. If someone posts a whole page worth, I'll divide it up into quoted sections and respond to each section accordingly. This has, in the past, gotten me accused frequently of being a Furious Typer, though I don't think this is a totally accurate description because:
A) Though I will respond to everything, I still rarely respond with more than one paragraph per quoted section.
B) I can type 185 words a minute, so what might look like a full lengthy verbal assault of nonsense may have actually only taken me three minutes to type.
Hmm... I guess if I got to pick my warrior type, I'd go with Big Cat. Being a writer, I thrive off of positive feedback, and while I do try to actively participate, I'll only post when I think I have something worth contributing. I can, however, be fairly vicious when I believe I'm being intentionally provoked, and when in direct combat with another user looking for a flame fight, I find it's much easier to let them set themselves up for an attack than charge in swinging (which I guess could qualify as toying with them).
On the whole though, there are very few posters that specifically fit just one classification of warrior, and chances are, if you've visited that site, you're not one of them.
)