Shadow Wulf wrote:Well your probably right. but the claws has to start from somewhere, The nails have to be the foundation for the claws, other wise the nails would just fall off and the claws would take its place, and I dont like that idea, so the length of the nails has to make some kind of a difference.
And thats just my oppinion, Im not conflicting with yours Vuldari.
You don't need to defend yourself for having a differing opinion than mine.
This subject, I admit, does not seem to have a perfect answer yet. From a Bioligical perspective, it actually seems more likely to me that the fingernails Would break, fall off and be discarded completely rather than the dead material growing into a larger shape and becoming part of the claw. After all, claws are imbeded within the digit in a different manner, and far more deeply than a fingernail is. For the fingernail to become the claw, it would actually need to grow inward and puncture a large round hole into the end of the finger in order to anchor itself firmly there.
On the other hand, I also admit that the idea of all the finger and toe nails falling off is a bit gross, and I don't like that very much. ...however, at least for me, it feels a little easier to deal with when I imagine them sort of cracking and crubling away in tiny shards, little by little, as the claw takes it's place, rather than it sort of *popping out* and dropping away in one, or several large pieces. Tiny jagged sand and splinter-like crubled fingernails also would not likely be easily recognised as anything but normal dirt, grime and gravel if encountered on the ground somewhere as well... Eliminating the "gross discovery" element.
Again...that is just the way I see it.
------------------------------------------------
...But This Is Getting Off Topic... *OOPS*

How DID we get onto the subject of Claws Anyway?...



