Page 2 of 4

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:46 pm
by Morkulv

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:47 pm
by ravaged_warrior

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:15 am
by Morkulv
True. As far as freeroaming goes, the Elder Scrolls games are obviously the best, and even defeating games like GTA easily when it comes to freeroaming.

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:25 pm
by Aki

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:36 pm
by Vuldari

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:33 pm
by Morkulv

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:44 pm
by Shadow Wulf
Yes, marrowind worlds are alot bigger. But you cant do half as many fun things in marrowind as you can in GTA.

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:28 pm
by Morkulv

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:24 am
by ravaged_warrior

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:54 am
by Shadow Wulf
Your right on that one. But I just like how verstile you are in GTA instead of feeling like a robot in marrowind.

And you can do alot of things on San Andreas, you just have to improvise.

Ex. My friend put a cheat for the jet on co-op, he piloted while I got on the jet. Then he tries hard not to go too fast that way I wont be kicked off. And I also have gotten on other vehicles raining massacre.

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:44 am
by Morkulv
Robot? You realise that Morrowind is first-person? Yeah its switchable, but you never get the impression of being a robot...

I'm seriously doubting you ever played Morrowind, Shadow Wulf.
:P

And like I said, GTA games are very limited but you don't really realise that because you've got a entire city for your own (a entire world in Morrowind). And if you read your journal in Morrowind you should have known what to do.

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:20 pm
by Shadow Wulf
I played marrowind for the xbox and Im telling you the character felt kinda clunky. :P

But I still like marrowind, I was overwhelmed of how big the world is.

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:40 pm
by Aki

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:11 pm
by Morkulv

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:21 pm
by Shadow Wulf
Im not talking graphics, graphics were pretty good. Im talking about the way the character moved, and thats not even that big of a deal. Its obvouse that your a Elder Scrolls Fanboy.lol

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:58 am
by Lukas
simmer down now people

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:00 am
by Shadow Wulf
Morkulv is making a deal about it. I just dont like how the character moved thats all.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:06 am
by ravaged_warrior
Shadow Wulf wrote:Morkulv is making a deal about it.
I don't think Morkulv was making a big deal out of it, just disagreeing with you. You, after all, are the one who called Morkulv a fanboy.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:27 pm
by Shadow Wulf
Thats not an insult. plus he claims that I havent played morrowind. I just simply stating my oppinion, nothing that serously go againts morrowind and he insist on disagreeing with me no matter what. I just wish he can drop it already. I just think the characters move kinda clunky thats all.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:51 pm
by Morkulv

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:57 pm
by Shadow Wulf
Sorry but everytime I say Morrowind, I say as if its spelled Marrowind, it just stuck with me and I try hard to stop. I do like Morrowind. I can think of nothing bad about it except it takes a freakin hour to get from one town to the next. :lol:

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:36 pm
by Aki
Shadow Wulf wrote:Sorry but everytime I say Morrowind, I say as if its spelled Marrowind, it just stuck with me and I try hard to stop. I do like Morrowind. I can think of nothing bad about it except it takes a freakin hour to get from one town to the next. :lol:
Bah, try Stalker. Morrowind at least has bug-buses.

In Stalker one has to hoof it everywhere. The only saving grace here is that you can sprint and run super-fast for short periods of time. Though this can be lengthened by chugging energy drinks as you run...

Not always the smartest thing to do though. As one quickly learns why there are no vehicles aside from the occaisonal APC, Jeep or Helicopter in the zone. Anomalies can be hard to spot when moving fast and you really do not want to run directly into a "Vortex" anamoly. It doesn't end well.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:39 pm
by Wulfur
Would you guys say S.T.A.L.K.E.R would be worth buying now or waiting till it's price goes down. Cause it sounds fun and seem like it looks good as well. but seems like it is laking story.

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:47 pm
by Aki
Wulfur wrote:Would you guys say S.T.A.L.K.E.R would be worth buying now or waiting till it's price goes down. Cause it sounds fun and seem like it looks good as well. but seems like it is laking story.
It's worth it now, I think. It's only 40 bucks afterall.

Stalker most certainly isn't lacking story. It's got a great one thus far, and supposedly has like, 7 endings. I'm not done yet and it's still got me wondering things. And from what I hear you'll still be left wondering until you've gotten a number of the endings. Since, like life, Stalker won't tell you everything.

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:15 pm
by Wulfur
Oh! that does sound good then. Next time I have a chance I will pick it up. I always enjoy a game that can always have a diffrent ending that has a good reason to play it over and over to learn new things. :)

Ty for the response most appreciated. :D