Page 2 of 3
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:27 pm
by Figarou
outwarddoodles wrote:I like the one Vilkacis had suggested.
What!?! I don't brag about my position. Take this you werewolf wanna be llama!!
Werewolf in llama's clothing.
you mean a llama in werewolf's clothing.
NUR!!
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 9:18 am
by Kzinistzerg
yes, i like that too. can tha be implemented?
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:47 pm
by Figarou
The thing about having a custom title is that I have to assign it to that person.
I have to create a new rank, type in the info, then assign it.
It'll be best if we have more titles under legendary.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:01 pm
by Vilkacis
Figarou wrote:The thing about having a custom title is that I have to assign it to that person.
I have to create a new rank, type in the info, then assign it.
It'll be best if we have more titles under legendary.
I don't know how easy or hard it would be to implement these, but here are a couple custom title mods available for phpBB:
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.ph ... tom+titles
http://www.phpbbhacks.com/download/1178
In the meantime, how about these titles:
0-4: Nothing
5-9: Just Bitten
10-19: First Change
20-29: Dealing with the Change
30-49: Junior Pack Member
50-99: Pack Member
100-174: Senior Pack Member
175-299: Pack Leader
300-449: Pack Elder
450-599: Renowned
600+: Legendary
Note: I adjusted the scale a bit. This will make it so that only three members are Legendary right now, but that number is going to increase soon, I imagine, as there are three more in the 500 range, plus a dozen more regular posters standing at over 300.
Look good?
-- Vilkacis
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:05 pm
by Kzinistzerg
sounds good to me!
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:09 pm
by Figarou
Oh my. I never made any modifications to a phpBB before. What I can do is practice on my phpBB board. I dare not do it here unless I know what I'm doing 1st.
Vilkacis wrote:In the meantime, how about these titles:
0-4: Nothing
5-9: Just Bitten
10-19: First Change
20-29: Dealing with the Change
30-49: Junior Pack Member
50-99: Pack Member
100-174: Senior Pack Member
175-299: Pack Leader
300-449: Pack Elder
450-599: Renowned
600+: Legendary
Note: I adjusted the scale a bit. This will make it so that only three members are Legendary right now, but that number is going to increase soon, I imagine, as there are three more in the 500 range, plus a dozen more regular posters standing at over 300.
Look good?
-- Vilkacis
Those are interesting titles.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:38 pm
by Vilkacis
Figarou wrote:Those are interesting titles.
How so? I just tried to extend what we had, rather than add new stuff.
-- Vilkacis
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:48 pm
by Apharoh
i was legendary for a few sweet hours of legendary legendness *tear*
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:52 pm
by Vilkacis
Apharoh wrote:i was legendary for a few sweet hours of legendary legendness *tear*
Just means when you get to Legendary next time you'll be doubly Legendary--how many can say that?
-- Vilkacis
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 3:55 pm
by Figarou
you know. I don't mind typing in a custom title. If that person chooses to have one. Thing is, it has to be above Legendary. 1000 posts and you have a custom title.
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:20 pm
by Apharoh
yay im gonna start right now
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:21 pm
by Figarou
Apharoh wrote:yay im gonna start right now
Heh, I'm going to put "belly slider" for your custom title!!
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2005 5:12 pm
by Kzinistzerg
heehee... mine'll be... (once i get that far, if) Pruple Weretiger or Officiall Duckie Imbiber
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 7:02 pm
by Anubis
Aki wrote:I like this one. ^_^
Vilkacis wrote:0 - 4 (No Moons - No title)
5 - 9 (Just Bitten)
10 - 19 (Dealing with the Change)
20 - 29 (Pack Member)
30 - 49 (Pack Leader)
50 - 99 (Pack Elder)
100 - 149 (Legendary/Custom Title)
150 - 199 (Legendary/Custom Title)
200 - 299 (Legendary/Custom Title)
300 - 399 (Legendary/Custom Title)
400+ (Legendary/Custom Title)
Moderator
Administrator
-- Vilkacis
me two chanage it like this
Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2005 7:21 pm
by Vilkacis
We did that for a little while, but too many people were upset by the change, so we put it back. We probably won't be changing the rating system again any time soon.
C'est la vie.
-- Vilkacis
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:10 pm
by WereDog
how could anyone be upset by it? it is a great idea.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 3:43 pm
by Lupin
WereDog wrote:how could anyone be upset by it? it is a great idea.
It's just the way the internet works. Not matter what you do, someone,
somwhere will complain about it.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:03 pm
by WereDog
but im sure that more people would like it, then those who dont.
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 6:32 pm
by Fenrir
I like the second one, the one with both full moon and new moons.
You should do that, but how would you make a custom title?
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:43 pm
by Kzinistzerg
Wait a minute, what? i thought they were the stretchy scale... why aren't they? who didn't like it?
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:05 pm
by Vilkacis
Shadowblaze wrote:Wait a minute, what? i thought they were the stretchy scale... why aren't they? who didn't like it?
Goldenwolf, Stormdancer and ABrownrigg spoke out strongly against it; there were also a few other expressions of dislike, though of a smaller magnitude, along with a fair number who expressed regret at having lost Legendary status.
The new system didn't last more than half a day, if that.
-- Vilkacis
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:07 am
by WereDog
but what were theyre arguments? where if it is, is it posted here on the forum?
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:14 am
by Figarou
WereDog wrote:but what were theyre arguments? where if it is, is it posted here on the forum?
it starts here.
http://calypso-blue.com/werewolf/viewto ... 5471#15471
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:27 am
by Vilkacis
Actually, it starts earlier in the thread than that, but the one you pointed to is the first outright argument against.
Ultimately, people are going to mis-take the ranking as a reflection of contribution, which is not the case -- but since enough people will think of it that way, it may as well be. Inevitably, it will upset people to 'lose' rank, when, in reality, nothing has changed -- they still have the exact same post-count they always did.
But what the ranking
does do is force a new distinction between Legendary with low post-count and Legendary with high post-count. This difference has always existed, but now it would be emphasized. And I can understand why those in the first category wouldn't like that. Although, I can't help but think that if we had started with this system, nobody would feel slighted, and they would not care so much that they had a different rank.
-- Vilkacis
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:28 pm
by Goldenwolf
Vilkacis wrote:
0-4: Nothing
5-9: Just Bitten
10-19: First Change
20-29: Dealing with the Change
30-49: Junior Pack Member
50-99: Pack Member
100-174: Senior Pack Member
175-299: Pack Leader
300-449: Pack Elder
450-599: Renowned
600+: Legendary
Hmmm, that's actually not a bad scale there. I like that a lot better. Makes more sense to me and stuff. I don't need to be Legendary, I just like to be recognized as a participating pack member.