Page 2 of 3

Re: Vore?

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:43 am
by Kaebora
Well, as long as it's PG-13 or less, there's no issue. I've seen plenty of blood and gore in PG-13 movies too, and perhaps a few where people get eaten by a monster.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 2:13 pm
by Figarou
The Lord Wolf wrote:I meant vore, and vore only. A lot of people I know carry it a little too far, which I just find incredibly disturbing. As far as a fetish goes, that's why I dislike wikipedia's definition. Not everyone likes it to that degree. I enjoy the subject as much as someone enjoys a video game (only good analogy I could find). Nothing more. About pornography, no such thing exists in my stories, I make sure of that. I can't stand it when you're reading a vore story and someone includes that without warning. All I cover is the eating, which both wolves werewolves do a lot of. I include blood from time to time, but nothing more than cuts. Please do not mistake me for a second as one of those weird ppl online than makes stories that no one wants to read because of their mature content. I think it's safe to say that I'm a reasonably popular writer in the vore world, but I am tired of hiding there. I want to see how the normal world welcomes those of us who like vore, seeing as we have that fetish through no fault of our own. Believe me I didn't choose it and I don't always want it. But I have it, and I will embrace what I am given.

Ummmm.....we ALL need to eat. I don't know why its considered "vore" if "eating" is all you cover.

Wolves and werewolves don't swallow thier food whole like a snake. Sure...wolves can gorge themselves in one sitting cause they have large stomachs. But not to the point where they have an extremely huge belly.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 8:56 pm
by The Lord Wolf
I think you miss my point. The eating is not what makes it vore, the interest in the actual eating is what makes it vore. There is an element to it that cannot be explained, or at least I have no words for it. Outside looking in, I realize vore must seem like a very strange thing. But inside looking out, it seems there is no way to make a normal person see it through our eyes.

As for wolves and werewolves swallowing their food whole and having huge bellies, that enters the realm of fantasy does it not? Then I feel I should point out that the very subject of a werewolf also enters the realm of fantasy, ya?

Re: Vore?

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:24 pm
by Figarou
The Lord Wolf wrote:I think you miss my point. The eating is not what makes it vore, the interest in the actual eating is what makes it vore. There is an element to it that cannot be explained, or at least I have no words for it. Outside looking in, I realize vore must seem like a very strange thing. But inside looking out, it seems there is no way to make a normal person see it through our eyes.
You mean like eating even though they are not hungry? In other words, having the pleasure to devour whatever living being they come acorss?


The Lord Wolf wrote:As for wolves and werewolves swallowing their food whole and having huge bellies, that enters the realm of fantasy does it not? Then I feel I should point out that the very subject of a werewolf also enters the realm of fantasy, ya?
DUH!!!

Re: Vore?

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 9:45 pm
by The Lord Wolf
No... That's not at all what I meant. I meant the actual INTEREST in it. Having the pleasure of eating other creatures, that part you are correct about. But not doing it all the time. In most vore stories the pred eats because of need, not just mindless eating.

Duh? I was just pointing out that you somewhat confused me by saying that werewolves and wolves don't swallow their food whole. Yet if werewolves don't actually exist, how do you know they don't swallow there food whole? Swallowing something whole is just as much fantasy as werewolves themselves. We aren't so different if you look at it my way.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:33 pm
by Figarou
The Lord Wolf wrote:No... That's not at all what I meant. I meant the actual INTEREST in it. Having the pleasure of eating other creatures, that part you are correct about. But not doing it all the time. In most vore stories the pred eats because of need, not just mindless eating.
ok...gotcha.
The Lord Wolf wrote:Duh? I was just pointing out that you somewhat confused me by saying that werewolves and wolves don't swallow their food whole. Yet if werewolves don't actually exist, how do you know they don't swallow there food whole? Swallowing something whole is just as much fantasy as werewolves themselves. We aren't so different if you look at it my way.
Swallowing a piece of meat torn from the victim whole......yes. That I can understand. (Without chewing on it 1st.) Any other way just doesn't make sence. (As in what snakes do.)

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:59 am
by Silent Hunter
Does it really matter how vore works? Its just a fetish which has a lot of room to it. Want snake like wolves? Thats fine? Want to bend physics? Fine also. It does not have to make sense.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:40 am
by Berserker
I have never encountered any instance of material specifically described as "vore" that existed outside of the context of fetishism. Vore has a very specific intent: any art created to satisfy an interest in Vore is by its own definition created to satisfy a fetish, and in that case, Wikipedia's definition is 100% correct.

As for my thoughts on it: repulsive.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:38 pm
by Kaebora
If this is referring to merely a werewolf tearing up a human body and devouring the entrails, that isn't what I consider "Vore" by definition. It's "Gore". We like gore. It's awesome. Splatter those intestines all over the walls!
:)

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 12:51 pm
by IndianaJones
Mmm....blood.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 1:51 pm
by Terastas
Midnight wrote:I probably did as well (it's just been so many decades since I watched any of the Looney Tunes cartoons that I can't remember for sure)... the same way I do (vaguely) remember hoping that, just for once, Charlie Brown would get to kick that damned football. Basically because I was bored with the ending always being the same. (Excuse me, Mr. Schulz, but your needle is stuck...)
Hm. Yeah, good point. I guess what I was trying to imply was that, when it comes to anything of a sexual nature, it's not a question of whether or not we are interested in [insert fetish here], but only to what extent we are and whether we are enough for it to qualify as a fetish.

That's how it is according to Ron White anyway. Warning: 13+:
Ron White on being gay.

:grinp:

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 9:13 pm
by MoonKit
The Lord Wolf wrote: Yet if werewolves don't actually exist, how do you know they don't swallow there food whole? Swallowing something whole is just as much fantasy as werewolves themselves. We aren't so different if you look at it my way.
Little Red Riding Hood. :D

The wolf must have swallowed everybody whole if the woodsmen chops them out at the end.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:03 pm
by Figarou
MoonKit wrote:
The Lord Wolf wrote: Yet if werewolves don't actually exist, how do you know they don't swallow there food whole? Swallowing something whole is just as much fantasy as werewolves themselves. We aren't so different if you look at it my way.
Little Red Riding Hood. :D

The wolf must have swallowed everybody whole if the woodsmen chops them out at the end.
There's so many different version of that story its hard to tell which is the original.

But THIS is my favorite!!!


:jester:

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:36 pm
by The Lord Wolf
Kaebora wrote:If this is referring to merely a werewolf tearing up a human body and devouring the entrails, that isn't what I consider "Vore" by definition. It's "Gore". We like gore. It's awesome. Splatter those intestines all over the walls!
:)
I doubt someone being swallowed whole could possibly be any worse than people's guts and organs flying like confetti at a Macy's Day Parade, so my stories should be safe. Though a werewolf tearing up a human body and devouring the entrails, i've never seen a more clear cut example of hard vore than that! I could write a story like that and pass it off as both vore and normal... 13+ of course... but normal.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:47 pm
by Figarou
The Lord Wolf wrote:
I doubt someone being swallowed whole could possibly be any worse than people's guts and organs flying like confetti at a Macy's Day Parade, so my stories should be safe. Though a werewolf tearing up a human body and devouring the entrails, i've never seen a more clear cut example of hard vore than that! I could write a story like that and pass it off as both vore and normal... 13+ of course... but normal.
Want to know something strange about that. Being swallowed whole has been done so many times in the old cartoons. Its not considered "gore" since its safe for young children to watch.

So....which will it be? The type of swallowing we see in cartoons? Or do you have something different in mind?

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:15 am
by The Lord Wolf
The "soft vore" (swallowing whole) stories I write i'll leave to sites centered around vore, ya? However, the "hard vore" stories I write seem to be exactly what you fellow wolf lovers are up for, even if it is not vore to you. It will benifit vore fans and gore fans alike! Blood and gore all over the walls it is.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 12:40 am
by Silverclaw
Is there a difference between 'hard vore' and gore? :?

Personally, not my cup of tea. I don't mind seeing cartoons of things being swallowed whole(Tom and Jerry, ect) or horror movies with lots of gore or nature docs of things like snakes/predators feeding(unless the prey is still alive). Not turned on by it though.

I do enjoy eating chocolate though....I'm vore-y for that I guess. lol lck :wink:

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:14 am
by RedEye
Silverclaw wrote:Is there a difference between 'hard vore' and gore? :?

Personally, not my cup of tea. I don't mind seeing cartoons of things being swallowed whole(Tom and Jerry, ect) or horror movies with lots of gore or nature docs of things like snakes/predators feeding(unless the prey is still alive). Not turned on by it though.

I do enjoy eating chocolate though....I'm vore-y for that I guess. lol lck :wink:
Egad! The dreaded and expen$ive Choco-Vore! My housemate is one of those.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:04 am
by Terastas
Silverclaw wrote:Is there a difference between 'hard vore' and gore? :?
All hard vore is gore, but not all gore is hard vore.

Red Victoria, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Saw, Silent Hill and Hannibal were all gory, but only the last one was ever vory.

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:43 pm
by The Lord Wolf
Ugh! Hannibal! An example of hard vore, true... But such a disgusting light to put it in. Most of us don't like humans in vore unless they are prey. Werewolf + Human = Gore. That's the way I prefer it!

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:25 am
by RedEye
Actually, Doctor Lechter's recipes were really quite tasty...

If you substitute pork! :lol:

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:09 am
by Midnight
RedEye wrote:Actually, Doctor Lechter's recipes were really quite tasty...

If you substitute pork! :lol:
Two words: "long pig".

This is also one of the reasons I think that an anthropophagic diet would be bad for a werewolf: too fatty and unhealthy. (Any werewolf that tried eating me, for example, would probably find its cholesterol levels through the roof within a week...)

Re: Vore?

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 7:12 am
by Figarou
Midnight wrote:
RedEye wrote:Actually, Doctor Lechter's recipes were really quite tasty...

If you substitute pork! :lol:
Two words: "long pig".

This is also one of the reasons I think that an anthropophagic diet would be bad for a werewolf: too fatty and unhealthy. (Any werewolf that tried eating me, for example, would probably find its cholesterol levels through the roof within a week...)

With the werewolf's high metabolism? naaaaaaaaa.


om nom nom nom nom :pacwolf:

heh...now for the cherry.

:jester:

Re: Vore?

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:12 pm
by Kaebora
The Lord Wolf wrote:The "soft vore" (swallowing whole) stories I write i'll leave to sites centered around vore, ya? However, the "hard vore" stories I write seem to be exactly what you fellow wolf lovers are up for, even if it is not vore to you. It will benifit vore fans and gore fans alike! Blood and gore all over the walls it is.
Then you admit that it will fulfill a purpose of satisfiing vore fetish fans? If that is the case, I would strongly suggest not posting it here. Due to the fact that many members would protest it, it could end up in a bad situation. We're used to gore as a fact of nature. Animals only swallow creatuers whole if it is conveineant. Otherwise, they have to rip the carcass to shreads. Many of us do find it creepy that anyone would find that to be a turn-on, to the point that angst will fly if a story is written here to sexually enhance carniverous behavior in any way.

Correct me if I'm wrong?

Re: Vore?

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:21 pm
by outwarddoodles
Kaebora wrote:
The Lord Wolf wrote:The "soft vore" (swallowing whole) stories I write i'll leave to sites centered around vore, ya? However, the "hard vore" stories I write seem to be exactly what you fellow wolf lovers are up for, even if it is not vore to you. It will benifit vore fans and gore fans alike! Blood and gore all over the walls it is.
Then you admit that it will fulfill a purpose of satisfiing vore fetish fans? If that is the case, I would strongly suggest not posting it here. Due to the fact that many members would protest it, it could end up in a bad situation. We're used to gore as a fact of nature. Animals only swallow creatuers whole if it is conveineant. Otherwise, they have to rip the carcass to shreads. Many of us do find it creepy that anyone would find that to be a turn-on, to the point that angst will fly if a story is written here to sexually enhance carniverous behavior in any way.

Correct me if I'm wrong?
He already stated that the story was not sexual -- only to the people who have a fetish for it. Anyone could have a fetish for anything, and that doesn't stop anyone here from posting otherwise non-sexual material.