Figarou wrote:I see you have been busy making your own set. I'm tempted to make my own set as well. But I'll just use the default for now.
There are TWO reasons why I have been doing that.
1- It was an excuse to get practice using Gimp. (Re-creating something is one of the best ways to lean how to make it on your own...be that Art, a Table, or Whatever.)
2-...I was creatively challenged, so it was easier to just copy someone elses Ideas than come up with my own.
Please Forgive the Occasional Outburst of my Inner Sage ... for he is Oblivious to Sarcasm, and not Easily Silenced.
Figarou wrote:I see you have been busy making your own set. I'm tempted to make my own set as well. But I'll just use the default for now.
There are TWO reasons why I have been doing that.
1- It was an excuse to get practice using Gimp. (Re-creating something is one of the best ways to lean how to make it on your own...be that Art, a Table, or Whatever.)
2-...I was creatively challenged, so it was easier to just copy someone elses Ideas than come up with my own.
Redoing an edit thats already made is both easy and saves time. I don't think I'm good enough to make something from scratch. I still need lots of practice. I'm starting to get used to the pixal placement.
I have several ideas that I want to try. I still want one where the fur ruffles up when a high speed duckie flies by. I need to experiment with that one.
as for me im as confusecd as something confused i will work it out if i could stare at it for 5 mins i get distracted *walks off Muttering about something shiny*
silverpaw wrote:as for me im as confusecd as something confused i will work it out if i could stare at it for 5 mins i get distracted *walks off Muttering about something shiny*
Reading your posts confuses me.
*walks off muttering about new ways to bonk werewolves on the noggin*
yeah i seem to have that effect on other minds... hehehe a skil you dont, wait yes you do you confuse me all the time with your technical mumbo jumbo(im already confusing right?)
Hmmmm...not bad. I think some improvements can be made. Have at it, Vuldari.
No thanks...I don't see the point. Morphing the face alone served the purpose of that Emoticaon just fine.
It is really best to Keep emoticons as small as possible. The only reason I added part of the body to the Tail Wag emoticon was because it needed an extra reference point. Without the visable shoulders and backside, it would have just looked like the head retracting and being replaced by the tail.
"...WTF..."
If more is going to be added to that perticular animation, one might as well go all the way and show the whole body...and I am Definately NOT up to doing a full body TF animation. That is not within my abilities yet. (Not if you want it to look any good, that is.)
Please Forgive the Occasional Outburst of my Inner Sage ... for he is Oblivious to Sarcasm, and not Easily Silenced.
Vuldari wrote:
No thanks...I don't see the point. Morphing the face alone served the purpose of that Emoticaon just fine.
It is really best to Keep emoticons as small as possible. The only reason I added part of the body to the Tail Wag emoticon was because it needed an extra reference point. Without the visable shoulders and backside, it would have just looked like the head retracting and being replaced by the tail.
"...WTF..."
If more is going to be added to that perticular animation, one might as well go all the way and show the whole body...and I am Definately NOT up to doing a full body TF animation. That is not within my abilities yet. (Not if you want it to look any good, that is.)
I see your point.
oh well, i'll go back to doing something with just the wolf head. But I do have something in mind with the wolf head and shoulders. I'll work on it later.