Page 15 of 68
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:18 pm
by Figarou
I see you have been busy making your own set. I'm tempted to make my own set as well. But I'll just use the default for now.
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2005 11:45 pm
by Vuldari
Figarou wrote:I see you have been busy making your own set. I'm tempted to make my own set as well. But I'll just use the default for now.
There are TWO reasons why I have been doing that.
1- It was an excuse to get practice using Gimp. (Re-creating something is one of the best ways to lean how to make it on your own...be that Art, a Table, or Whatever.)
2-...I was creatively challenged, so it was easier to just copy someone elses Ideas than come up with my own.
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 12:28 am
by Figarou
Vuldari wrote:Figarou wrote:I see you have been busy making your own set. I'm tempted to make my own set as well. But I'll just use the default for now.
There are TWO reasons why I have been doing that.
1- It was an excuse to get practice using Gimp. (Re-creating something is one of the best ways to lean how to make it on your own...be that Art, a Table, or Whatever.)
2-...I was creatively challenged, so it was easier to just copy someone elses Ideas than come up with my own.
Redoing an edit thats already made is both easy and saves time. I don't think I'm good enough to make something from scratch. I still need lots of practice. I'm starting to get used to the pixal placement.
I have several ideas that I want to try. I still want one where the fur ruffles up when a high speed duckie flies by. I need to experiment with that one.
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 3:59 am
by silverpaw
as for me

im as confusecd as something confused i will work it out if i could stare at it for 5 mins

i get distracted

*walks off Muttering about something shiny*
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:02 am
by Figarou
silverpaw wrote:as for me

im as confusecd as something confused i will work it out if i could stare at it for 5 mins

i get distracted

*walks off Muttering about something shiny*
Reading your posts confuses me.
*walks off muttering about new ways to bonk werewolves on the noggin*
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 4:10 am
by silverpaw
yeah i seem to have that effect on other minds...

hehehe a skil you dont, wait yes you do you confuse me all the time with your technical mumbo jumbo(im already confusing right?)

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 6:18 pm
by Kzinistzerg
its mroe confusing if you talk in another language...
duckies sind sehr lecker, nicht?
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 8:27 pm
by silverpaw
who me or him
was that german?

kool
ever been to switzerland? i was born there

Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:27 am
by Lycanthrope
(EDIT)
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 1:23 pm
by Figarou
Hmmmm...not bad. I think some improvements can be made. Have at it, Vuldari.
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2005 11:50 pm
by Vuldari
Figarou wrote:
Hmmmm...not bad. I think some improvements can be made. Have at it, Vuldari.
No thanks...I don't see the point. Morphing the face alone served the purpose of that Emoticaon just fine.
It is really best to Keep emoticons as small as possible. The only reason I added part of the body to the Tail Wag emoticon was because it needed an extra reference point. Without the visable shoulders and backside, it would have just looked like the head retracting and being replaced by the tail.
"...WTF..."
If more is going to be added to that perticular animation, one might as well go all the way and show the whole body...and I am Definately NOT up to doing a full body TF animation. That is not within my abilities yet. (Not if you want it to look any good, that is.)

Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 4:16 am
by Figarou
Vuldari wrote:
No thanks...I don't see the point. Morphing the face alone served the purpose of that Emoticaon just fine.
It is really best to Keep emoticons as small as possible. The only reason I added part of the body to the Tail Wag emoticon was because it needed an extra reference point. Without the visable shoulders and backside, it would have just looked like the head retracting and being replaced by the tail.
"...WTF..."
If more is going to be added to that perticular animation, one might as well go all the way and show the whole body...and I am Definately NOT up to doing a full body TF animation. That is not within my abilities yet. (Not if you want it to look any good, that is.)

I see your point.
oh well, i'll go back to doing something with just the wolf head. But I do have something in mind with the wolf head and shoulders. I'll work on it later.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 6:12 am
by Figarou
WET WOLF 7.0 
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:38 am
by silverpaw
well to me there all sweet and kool i like the full body, shoulder one i like the way it increases in size

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 1:25 pm
by Figarou
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 6:28 pm
by Kzinistzerg
You need something better to do...
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 6:30 pm
by Figarou
Shadowblaze wrote:You need something better to do...
You know, you're right. But I'm having to much fun with this.

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 6:32 pm
by Kzinistzerg
yeah, i know what you mean.
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 2:46 am
by silverpaw

i dont

i cant work GIMP

meh i cant be bothered anyway, i will stik to macromedia flash mx 7

yay

Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 11:18 am
by Silverfang

Damn my big muzzle

Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 11:25 am
by Figarou
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:08 pm
by outwarddoodles
*Looking at Fig rolling at floor and steps on him*
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 3:04 am
by silverpaw
eeeww figarou blood on my paw

aahh and some brains

Re: High ho! Silver! Awroooohhhhh!
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 5:37 am
by Aki
Figarou wrote:

<-------White wolf

^ Heh, the 'grin' version.
I couldn't figure out how to get rid of the green though...
Edit: heh, looking back, i shoulda have used that one for reference, mine looks
look white.

Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 6:08 am
by silverpaw
meh the green kinda makes the white look brighter...and anyways green is kool aswell, to fix it dont yah set it to transparency or something?
