Page 4 of 9

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:28 pm
by Renorei
SnowWalker wrote:argh. In my own humble opinion, I feel there should be no breasts. And hey, I'm talking as a female who has plenty of them in human form!

And if you give me questions of mass and space and whatnot, I will retort with this:

We're talking about people who turn into wolves, if that doesn't break all sorts of physical laws in and of itself, then... :P ~

~Snowy *the very angered by the thought of breasts on werewolves.

DITTO!


And as far as that Goldenwolf/Natasha picture goes, I think it's beautiful. However, look at it again, without looking at the breasts. Cover the part of your computer screen that has breasts. Can you still tell it's a female? Absolutely.

As a female, I am opposed the idea of werewolves having breasts.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:33 pm
by Renorei
Also, look at this picture. This wolf doesn't actually have defined breasts. Her chest is rounded, which hints at the fact that she is female. Also, she has lots of curves, which let you know she's female. I think something like this maybe could work.

http://www.goldenwolfen.com/archive/Ske ... goldie.jpg


Though, I'd still prefer nothing at all.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:35 pm
by Aki
Excelsia wrote: Cover the part of your computer screen that has breasts. Can you still tell it's a female? Absolutely.
Not really, at least, not with the knowledge already of it being a female. One could easily mistake the female for a thin, femine guy... :P

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:36 pm
by Renorei
Aki wrote: Not really, at least, not with the knowledge already of it being a female. One could easily mistake the female for a thin, femine guy... :P
I, for one, find it easy to tell.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:38 pm
by Figarou
Excelsia wrote:
And as far as that Goldenwolf/Natasha picture goes, I think it's beautiful. However, look at it again, without looking at the breasts. Cover the part of your computer screen that has breasts. Can you still tell it's a female? Absolutely.
well, yes...it still has the feminine shape.


Now answer this. Wolves don't have a feminine shape like a human. How can you tell if a werewolf in wolf form is female or not?

Only way I could think of is placing a pink bow on its head. :roll:

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:39 pm
by outwarddoodles
Figarou- I think the female looks starved or something, her tummy is much too skinny especially when the male is much bigger and buff then hers. As I said, Males may and probaly are going to big stronger, but not excessively, just a more masculine shape but not super uber more buff.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:40 pm
by Black Shuck
Well, if you look at just heads, they look different, and you can assume the one is female, but maybe it's a young male.... Like The Last Supper, there's a lot of argument about "Who is this? John (I think) or Mary Magdalene?". I opt for the rounded chest like in GoldenWolf's drawing. They are still part human. I won't be outraged or anything if they don't have anything, but like I said, I lean more toward the side of having something (rounded chest like in the pic or actual little breasts).

And Fig: That female werewolf looks so anarexic!! I'm not really fond of that look :lol:

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:42 pm
by Figarou
outwarddoodles wrote:Figarou- I think the female looks starved or something, her tummy is much too skinny especially when the male is much bigger and buff then hers. As I said, Males may and probaly are going to big stronger, but not excessively, just a more masculine shape but not super uber more buff.

Starved? to skinny? Looks fine to me.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:44 pm
by Renorei
Figarou wrote: Now answer this. Wolves don't have a feminine shape like a human. How can you tell if a werewolf in wolf form is female or not?

Only way I could think of is placing a pink bow on its head. :roll:

You're right. There are very few differences between male and female wolves.

(What was your point?)

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:44 pm
by Figarou
Black Shuck wrote:
And Fig: That female werewolf looks so anarexic!! I'm not really fond of that look :lol:

You mean suffering from anorexia? Good grief she is a werewolf!! She knows she needs to eat in order to survive. :P

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:46 pm
by outwarddoodles
Figarou wrote:
outwarddoodles wrote:Figarou- I think the female looks starved or something, her tummy is much too skinny especially when the male is much bigger and buff then hers. As I said, Males may and probaly are going to big stronger, but not excessively, just a more masculine shape but not super uber more buff.
Starved? to skinny? Looks fine to me.
Not to me, that tummy looks unreasonably skinny. It takes a certain technique of squishing one's belly, or being starved, to get a very small look, which I beleive a few females still pratice today. The record I beleive is 14 inches all the way around (imagine that!), but I beleive it's unhealthy, I need to find some information of that. I think she's skinny, and as I said the male is also unreasonably buffer.

Yet otherwise I'm critiqueing how I think a real werewolf would look like, those are great sculptures that I'd myself LOVE to have.
:D

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:46 pm
by Kzinistzerg
Small if they're there- i draw them in as just another lump of flesh covered by fur.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:52 pm
by Figarou
Excelsia wrote:
Figarou wrote: Now answer this. Wolves don't have a feminine shape like a human. How can you tell if a werewolf in wolf form is female or not?

Only way I could think of is placing a pink bow on its head. :roll:

You're right. There are very few differences between male and female wolves.

(What was your point?)
My point was to see if you can spot the gender in the wolves. You can't. Especially from a distance. The male is somewhat larger when full grown. But its still hard to tell just by looking at the shape of the wolf.

Okay, answer this now. If a human female with large breasts goes to wolf form, what will happen to the breasts? Do they shrivel down to nothing? Move to the belly area?

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:56 pm
by Kzinistzerg
They would probably flatten and dissapear somewhat and then merge with the other sets that gradually appearwhile transforming.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:57 pm
by Renorei
Figarou wrote:
Excelsia wrote:
Figarou wrote: Now answer this. Wolves don't have a feminine shape like a human. How can you tell if a werewolf in wolf form is female or not?

Only way I could think of is placing a pink bow on its head. :roll:

You're right. There are very few differences between male and female wolves.

(What was your point?)
My point was to see if you can spot the gender in the wolves. You can't. Especially from a distance. The male is somewhat larger when full grown. But its still hard to tell just by looking at the shape of the wolf.

Okay, answer this now. If a human female with large breasts goes to wolf form, what will happen to the breasts? Do they shrivel down to nothing? Move to the belly area?
IMO, shrivel down to nothing, or just 'deflate'. If you're trying to think of this from some sort of scientific or logical standpoint, I applaud your effort, but honestly, when you get to a certain point you just have to 'fudge' and make things work, while knowing full well that it could never actually happen that way in real life.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:00 pm
by Figarou
Excelsia wrote:
IMO, shrivel down to nothing, or just 'deflate'. If you're trying to think of this from some sort of scientific or logical standpoint, I applaud your effort, but honestly, when you get to a certain point you just have to 'fudge' and make things work, while knowing full well that it could never actually happen that way in real life.
yup...thats why I asked where would the milk go if they shrival down to nothing. Or 'deflate.' Now imagine the wolf returning to human form. Them boobies will start to 'inflate.' Wouldn't that be an odd TF scene?

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:02 pm
by Renorei
Figarou wrote:
Excelsia wrote:
IMO, shrivel down to nothing, or just 'deflate'. If you're trying to think of this from some sort of scientific or logical standpoint, I applaud your effort, but honestly, when you get to a certain point you just have to 'fudge' and make things work, while knowing full well that it could never actually happen that way in real life.
yup...thats why I asked where would the milk go if they shrival down to nothing. Or 'deflate.' Now imagine the wolf returning to human form. Them boobies will start to 'inflate.' Wouldn't that be an odd TF scene?
Yep. But, if we're gonna have really tiny boobs anyway, they would have to inflate as well. There's not gonna be a massive amount of difference b/w inflating no boobs and inflating tiny boobs.


(I probably won't be replying to anything else for a couple of hours. I have a final tomorrow.)

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:04 pm
by outwarddoodles
Okay, answer this now. If a human female with large breasts goes to wolf form, what will happen to the breasts? Do they shrivel down to nothing? Move to the belly area?
Probally move around somewhere on the body, it is fat, if I'm correct, and probally can do that. Breats are unneeded on the chest area on a wolf anyway, they would get in the way as running, the barrel chest is made just for that purpose on all fours. Also some of the fat on the breasts may be used as energy in transformation, such as alot of other fat. Body Builders or people who are really skinny lose their breast fat and have no boobs, and have been told to be the first things to go when you deit, though thats not always necessarily correct.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:12 pm
by vrikasatma
The milk would get reabsorbed into the body's fluid stream (yeah! Vitamin and mineral mainline!).

The breast is mostly composed of adipose material — it's fat pads, basically. The mammary glands aren't that big and are located just below the skin surface. The fat in big breasts would also be absorbed and re-distributed and/or metabolized, skin cells redistributed elsewhere.

So I'd say big breasts would just be absorbed and redistributed by the shift. They'd appear to shrink as this happened.

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:15 pm
by Figarou
vrikasatma wrote:The milk would get reabsorbed into the body's fluid stream (yeah! Vitamin and mineral mainline!).

The breast is mostly composed of adipose material — it's fat pads, basically. The mammary glands aren't that big and are located just below the skin surface. The fat in big breasts would also be absorbed and re-distributed and/or metabolized, skin cells redistributed elsewhere.

So I'd say big breasts would just be absorbed and redistributed by the shift. They'd appear to shrink as this happened.

well, makes sence when the breasts shrink. But what about returning to human form? explain the 'inflate' part. :wink:

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:18 pm
by Kzinistzerg
.
o
O

tadaaa! :lol:

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:22 pm
by Figarou
Shadowblaze wrote:.
o
O

tadaaa! :lol:
WHOA!! Do it again!! :lol:

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:23 pm
by Black Shuck
lol! Okay I got it! :lol: The fat that was redistributed is re-redistributed back into the breast region, but...the breasts are a little bit smaller perhaps? They grow back to normal with a few donuts lck hehe And if you don't eat yer donuts, your breasts will eventually disappear giving you the no-boobs chest. Ta daa! :lol: I like Shadowblaze's though :D

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:28 pm
by outwarddoodles
The milk would get reabsorbed into the body's fluid stream (yeah! Vitamin and mineral mainline!).
From what I know of the milk is only produced when pregnat and with a suckling child. Even though I don't know where the glands go.
well, makes sence when the breasts shrink. But what about returning to human form? explain the 'inflate' part.
If the fat moves to a different part of the body maybe it can find it's way back to the chest.
:?
Figarou wrote:
Shadowblaze wrote:.
o
O

tadaaa! :lol:
WHOA!! Do it again!! :lol:
:o :lol:

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:30 pm
by Kzinistzerg
I'm not going to do my improved version *resists using the font size button for obvious reasons*