Apokryltaros wrote: And my problem is that goat is still on my list of "Things I want to eat before I die."
Goat taste pretty good.
Yes.Figarou wrote:Apokryltaros wrote: And my problem is that goat is still on my list of "Things I want to eat before I die."
You have a list?
You don't suppose I could get (some of) your goat?Ancient wrote: Goat taste pretty good.
Although it's very convient to have such a list, it's also helped me earn a prominent spot on Greenpeace's blacklist.Lupin wrote: Heh, I need a list like that.
Which makes me wonder, what's wrong with being a were-deer? Those instincts people are so afraid of could come in handy. Prey animals only survive by outrunning, outclimbing, outswimming, outwiting, or otherwise being better than their predators at something. A deer could not live if it wasn't capable of getting away from a wolf. If ever there was a need to escape being a prey animal would be far more useful than being a predatory one.Anubis wrote:It sounds like most of use would be Okay with it as long its an animal of a preditory nature.
Do note that predators have to do all of the same things to catch ther prey.Reilune wrote:Which makes me wonder, what's wrong with being a were-deer? Those instincts people are so afraid of could come in handy. Prey animals only survive by outrunning, outclimbing, outswimming, outwiting, or otherwise being better than their predators at something.
I'm well aware of that. But pack hunters, when hunting alone, are nowhere near as sucessful in taking down said prey. They are almost completely dependant on the pack for food. Now a were___ would probably find it a bit difficult finding a big group of others like it depending on the rarity of weres both in the world and their specific area. Success rates are somewhat dependant on the numbers factor. The rest comes down to skill, intellegence, and abilities provided by species. The best kill rate in the world for pack hunters is the African "painted wolf" at 90%. However...even the lion, which was in the top five, only has a kill rate of 60%. And this is as a group. They do far worse on their own.Lupin wrote:Do note that predators have to do all of the same things to catch ther prey.Reilune wrote:Which makes me wonder, what's wrong with being a were-deer? Those instincts people are so afraid of could come in handy. Prey animals only survive by outrunning, outclimbing, outswimming, outwiting, or otherwise being better than their predators at something.
A were-Irish Elk would be awesome to behold.Reilune wrote:Which makes me wonder, what's wrong with being a were-deer? Those instincts people are so afraid of could come in handy. Prey animals only survive by outrunning, outclimbing, outswimming, outwiting, or otherwise being better than their predators at something. A deer could not live if it wasn't capable of getting away from a wolf. If ever there was a need to escape being a prey animal would be far more useful than being a predatory one.Anubis wrote:It sounds like most of use would be Okay with it as long its an animal of a preditory nature.
And some of those "snacks" are damn dangerous to boot. A giraffe has hooves the size of dinner plates that can crush a skull, ostriches can disembowel lions with a single kick, horned animals can gore you to death, and most all of them can kill you via trampling. I wouldn't mind being a prey animal so long as it's one that appeals to me. I want to be dangerous, but that doesn't mean I have to be ugly.
Do note that while wolves etc. may prefer to hunt in a pack, when alone they don't need to take down the large prey species you mention, but get along happily on much smaller and easier to catch things.Reilune wrote:\I'm well aware of that. But pack hunters, when hunting alone, are nowhere near as sucessful in taking down said prey. They are almost completely dependant on the pack for food. Now a were___ would probably find it a bit difficult finding a big group of others like it depending on the rarity of weres both in the world and their specific area. Success rates are somewhat dependant on the numbers factor. The rest comes down to skill, intellegence, and abilities provided by species. The best kill rate in the world for pack hunters is the African "painted wolf" at 90%. However...even the lion, which was in the top five, only has a kill rate of 60%. And this is as a group. They do far worse on their own.
As for solitary hunters they tend to be specialists, honing a particular skill based on enviornment. For example: the cheetah is good at running...but only in quick sprints. So long as the antelope can run for longer than the cheetah it doesn't have to outclass it in speed. Crocodiles are ambush hunters, falcons rely on quick dives, snakes constrict or use poison, spiders spin webs, ect. Specialists are good at what they do but with the right technique can be foiled without an extreme amount of effort.
So really...don't underestimate the power of prey animals. Living with them changes your whole outlook on those "helpless, weak little things".
Like voles and mice, for example.Ralith wrote:Do note that while wolves etc. may prefer to hunt in a pack, when alone they don't need to take down the large prey species you mention, but get along happily on much smaller and easier to catch things.Reilune wrote:\I'm well aware of that. But pack hunters, when hunting alone, are nowhere near as sucessful in taking down said prey. They are almost completely dependant on the pack for food. Now a were___ would probably find it a bit difficult finding a big group of others like it depending on the rarity of weres both in the world and their specific area. Success rates are somewhat dependant on the numbers factor. The rest comes down to skill, intellegence, and abilities provided by species. The best kill rate in the world for pack hunters is the African "painted wolf" at 90%. However...even the lion, which was in the top five, only has a kill rate of 60%. And this is as a group. They do far worse on their own.
As for solitary hunters they tend to be specialists, honing a particular skill based on enviornment. For example: the cheetah is good at running...but only in quick sprints. So long as the antelope can run for longer than the cheetah it doesn't have to outclass it in speed. Crocodiles are ambush hunters, falcons rely on quick dives, snakes constrict or use poison, spiders spin webs, ect. Specialists are good at what they do but with the right technique can be foiled without an extreme amount of effort.
So really...don't underestimate the power of prey animals. Living with them changes your whole outlook on those "helpless, weak little things".
Vuldari wrote:A bittersweet mixed blessing for someone who Wanted to be a werewolf, but got bitten by the Wrong Lycanthrope. ...and a nightmare for someone who didn't want it at all. A monster to humans...and a living joke mascot pet to the local Lycanthrope Pack.
Lupin wrote:Vuldari wrote:A bittersweet mixed blessing for someone who Wanted to be a werewolf, but got bitten by the Wrong Lycanthrope. ...and a nightmare for someone who didn't want it at all. A monster to humans...and a living joke mascot pet to the local Lycanthrope Pack.
What do you mean by "wrong" in this case?
Lupin wrote:Do note that all lycantrhropes are werecreatures, but not all werecreatures are lycanthropes.Figarou wrote:Thats what he means by "wrong" werecreature.
Well he also said 'lycanthrope', and Vuldari isn't one to mince words, so I don't really think that's it.Figarou wrote:yes...I know. I made a mistake in my post. I know a werelion is not called a lycanthrope.
Well some people do classify the dog as a subspecies of the wolf. So with extreme amounts of fudging, you could call it one.Ralith wrote:Let's take note that lycanthrope doesn't cover dogs either, though.