Page 4 of 5
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:39 pm
by Rhuen
I gave my werewolves two teets only as they only have two pups at a time, and the biped sexual attraction factor of them as well playing into it.
After all features that serve a family or reproductive purpose also serve the purpose of attracting mates. Along with additional features specifically designed to attract mates.
this subject is rather odd. I can't see Dolly Parten werewolves running around, after all if they are to go on four legs as well as two then that just doesn't work. I would say A-cup-B-cup only. with maybe the occasional C-cup, but for them that is like Dolly Parten for humans, and those would have a hard time getting about, and as such would likely loose in ranks to other females. Maybe like the Omega female of the pack, where the alpha is leaner with maybe an A-cup average for the Alpha female.
and the mane as high as human breasts are would likely cover the breasts anyways so it wouldn't be the sexual fetish thing people typically imagine I would imagine.
In the end the body shape, birthing hips, and hourglass frame and legs and such would be the best indicators for a human observer that a werewolf is female.
Re: Something to consider
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:06 am
by Blue-eyes in the dark
question wrote:Wolves have multiple teats as they have multiple pups. Are werewolves more likely to have multiple pups?
Even in any sort of fully shifted form a female werewolf is still a mother and would need to provide for her whelps. Given that humans have two breasts to support the normal one baby, I would say that the REAL question is what kind of birthing patterns werewolves have.
Id say, that yes. it would make some sense that a female would give birth to a litter of cubs, but boy would you have one moody wolf on your hands, (if any of you have ever seen a ticked off preggo woman, then you could easily put together the amount of damage that will be caused by a pregnant werewolf)

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:02 pm
by JoshuaMadoc
Has anyone ever even tried wrapping werewolf boobs tight enough for it not to jiggle like rockets... ? With something like a boob tube?
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:44 am
by Figarou
kitetsu wrote:Has anyone ever even tried wrapping werewolf boobs tight enough for it not to jiggle like rockets... ? With something like a boob tube?
And how is the television going to prevent the werewolf's boobies from jiggling?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... =boob+tube
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:19 am
by JoshuaMadoc
No, not that. I mean
something like this.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 1:08 pm
by Figarou
So...that prevents milk shakes...eh? How about channel surfing?
Heh...its something men can't resist.

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:18 pm
by JoshuaMadoc
Define "channel surfing".
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:29 pm
by Figarou
kitetsu wrote:Define "channel surfing".
Constantly changing channels on the TV.
gee..I thought you knew that one.

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:56 pm
by JoshuaMadoc
That one i knew, but i thought you were cryptically referring to some other body part.
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 10:04 pm
by Figarou
kitetsu wrote:That one i knew, but i thought you were cryptically referring to some other body part.
Nope.
"Channel surfing" means only one thing. You only do that when you're watching the "boob tube."

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 7:08 am
by Terastas
Hmm. . . Well, regarding human beings only having two. . . That's not always the case. Some people (myself included) have
supernumerary nipples, which aren't actual functioning nipples, but have the appearance of such.
What I'm alluding to is that, during a female shift, I believe she would only retain one
real set of working breasts, but in gestalt form, she develop some additional supernumeraries which, chances are, would go completely unnoticed.
And yes, I do think that a werewolf's chest size in relation to the rest of their body would decrease and that whatever fur a werewolf has would be enough to "keep her decent."
Of course, we need not go into detail. Chances are you'd get your arms ripped off before you could check for any of this.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:25 am
by Blue-eyes in the dark
Figarou wrote:kitetsu wrote:That one i knew, but i thought you were cryptically referring to some other body part.
Nope.
"Channel surfing" means only one thing. You only do that when you're watching the "boob tube."

lol, Fig you clown.

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 11:46 am
by Ansuru
Terastas wrote:
Of course, we need not go into detail. Chances are you'd get your arms ripped off before you could check for any of this.

nah, if she transforms during sex, I have all the reason in the world to find the answer ^^
FREAK!!!!
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:12 pm
by Black Claw
You're such a freak Ansuru?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:19 pm
by Ansuru
That was a reference to the
Accidentally Changing During Sex thread, you puker!
Although...fur does feel nice......
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:21 am
by Black Claw
Hey i would hate to be with that girl during that certaint time of the month for a girl?!?!?!?!?!

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:38 am
by Terastas
Ansuru wrote:nah, if she transforms during sex, I have all the reason in the world to find the answer ^^
Married and/or dating ladies in the Pack, would you object if your partner suddenly decided to play "find the boobies" or "count the boobies?" I wouldn't know being a guy and all, but I think accidentally shifting during sex would be embarrassing enough without my girlfriend looking for my "second tail" so she could make a before & after comparison.

I imagine that would be the male equivalent.
Sorry, but I think that looking for a part of a person's body and/or asking them to point it/them out for you kills the mood instantly. Best case scenario: You sleep on the couch.

Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2008 12:19 pm
by Ansuru
Terastas wrote:Ansuru wrote:nah, if she transforms during sex, I have all the reason in the world to find the answer ^^
Married and/or dating ladies in the Pack, would you object if your partner suddenly decided to play "find the boobies" or "count the boobies?" I wouldn't know being a guy and all, but I think accidentally shifting during sex would be embarrassing enough without my girlfriend looking for my "second tail" so she could make a before & after comparison.

I imagine that would be the male equivalent.
Sorry, but I think that looking for a part of a person's body and/or asking them to point it/them out for you kills the mood instantly. Best case scenario: You sleep on the couch.

Not to get too graphic here, but my point was, if you suddenly find yourself with a partner who could
eat you if she's not satisfied, you have a major incentive to foreplay. "Exploration" can be a part of that.
Geesh, nobody's gonna be dumb enough to start combing through her fur, scientifically counting "One, two, three..."

Don't call me a puker!
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:21 am
by Black Claw
Hey, i'm not the one exploring certaint areas at the wrong time, so don't call me that again or like my signature says i'll give you the beat down of a life time and it won't be so nice and quick, i'll do the ten year torture and we'll see what happens when i turn the water off and see who's what then.

actually i wouldn't do that but still don' call me that
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:35 pm
by Ansuru
I called you puker because you used the emoticon of the puking wolf. That's cruel to emotiwolfs, don't ya know?
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:10 pm
by MoonKit
Well if you believe the half form is a mix of human and wolf or a halfway point, that says to me that she would have one set of smaller boobs but several pairs of nipples. If she's halfway to wolf form, theres no need for several pairs of breasts as a wolf. Wolves nor humans have several pairs of boobs so where is she getting these from?! Nipples I understand but wolves dont have boobs.
However, a pregnant werewolf may appear to have several sets of breasts because wolf nipples do swell when feeding young. But again as mentioned, that also depends on how many young they have. I prefer one or two at a time like human women because they still have to raise them for 18 years. Though maybe twins would be more common among werewolves.
More then one set or really big ones is just not favorable by nature and would get in the way. I say keep them somewhat but cover them with a lot of fur so its not too noticeable.
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:51 pm
by RedEye
If your Werewolves (Female) go quadruped, anything over a b-cup is going to be chafe city, not to mention dragging things through the brush.
I go with Moon-Kit: small and hidden within her fur. Large mammae are not necessary for milk production; look at Chimps!
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:49 am
by Black Claw
Hey Ansuru, i've seen worse!! so don't think mine are bad. and besides, if they're on the emotions there meant to be used.

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 2:51 pm
by shiftergirl
ok, werewolf female would probebly have , but only for the use of children. some bood and websites stat that female werewolfs would no have more then two usable , if you guys don't know that then something is vary wrong with you.

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:39 pm
by Black Claw
Hey! it was Ansuru's comment not me.
