Vuldari wrote:
I'm not sure what you are trying to say about a wolves size by measuring it's back against the persons waist. Again...if the back is level with, or sligthly below the humans waist, then thier hips would be almost level, again making thier legs, and genaral scale close to equal.
What I'm saying is that most of that isn't fur.
...and the human has a head that needs to be included as well.
Not really. I was comparing where the wolf would come up to on the human. With the head of the wolf, it would come up to about the navel, though that is dependant on the position of the head of the wolf.
Lupin wrote:[quote]Compared to a 6' 3" Athletic HUMAN, a Wolf is almost puny.
Not really. You have to compare apples with apples If that wolf stood up on his hind legs, he'd be at most 2 feet shorter than the 6' human.[/size]
Stating that the wolf would be two feet shorter than the human is supposed to be an argument
Against my suggestion that it would look puny in comparison?[/quote]
See this photo:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/compassion ... t-1185488/
While the guy is beding down notice how little that guy is bending down to get face to face with the wolf, who is at an angle to the fence and isn't standing straight up either. This is a foot or so to an animal that spends most of its time on four legs. Personally, I would call an animal like that 'large'.
As for the perspective, the person is kneeling, and is behind the wolf. If thier positions were reversed and the person was standing up straight In Front of the wolf, the percieved size difference would appear slightly different, with the wolf looking marginally smaller. A few inches either way, and the difference between being in the fore-ground or back ground is all it takes.
Not really. The wolf are human are fairly close, which makes the apparent difference in height due to perspective fairly small.
Here's one where the human is close enough to tuch the wolf and it comes up to her waist:
http://www.wolfpark.org/images/howlnight/DSC_0146.jpg
And here's another: where the human is in front:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/compassion ... t-1185488/
But relatively speaking, in terms of size comparison to ALL animals, and not just domesticated canines, a wolf really is not that large next to a Human, a Lion, a Deer, a Bear or even an Ostrich (a Bird bigger than a Wolf).
And if you compare any of those to a blue whale they become absolutely tiny. The fact that humans and wolves are close to the same size is what makes a wolf a 'large animal'.
There's a reason he's called the '
Big Bad Wolf'.
PariahPoet wrote:Yes, this is true, but you also have to remember that a wolf's paw is much larger in comparison to its body than a dog's.
They're not exactly giant though:
http://images.nonexiste.net/view/wolfpa ... w_log.jpeg