Lubin The Undead WereWolf?
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:48 pm
I heard a myth that when a werewolf dies he becomes a lubin,"an undead ghoulish werewolf ''. Does anyone have any information about this myth?
This is the home of united werewolf fans across the globe. Searching to improve the image of the werewolf in popular culture, known as... The Pack
https://thepack.network/thepackboard/
I can't seem to find much:lycancomplex wrote:I heard a myth that when a werewolf dies he becomes a lubin,"an undead ghoulish werewolf ''. Does anyone have any information about this myth?
Another site elaborates (Source):People in Normandy believed in lupins or lubins, wolf like beings that talked at night in graveyards in an unknown language.
Here's a slightly different take:In Normandy tradition tells of certain fantastic beings known as lupins or lubins. The pass the night chattering together and twattling in an unknown tongue. They take their stand by the walls of country cemeteries, and howl dismally at the moon. Timorous and fearful of man they will flee away scared at a footstep or distant voice. In some districts, however, they are fierce and of the werewolf race, since they are said to scratch up the graves with their hands, and gnaw the poor dead bones."
(There's a little bit more information about it if you look at the page where I got that.)Felix Liebrecht speaks of the ways of certain ghostly werewolves, the "Lubins," that haunted medieval Normandy. These timid ghosts hunted in a pack, but to little point, for instead of turning on the intruder, they would disperse at the slightest noise, howling: "Robert est mort, Robert est mort." [n8 Liebrecht, Zur Volkskunde, p. 257n.].
In folklore, there is no such thing as proof, there are only general trends that are seen in the authentic beliefs of people belonging to this culture or that culture. There are always individuals within a culture who hold beliefs that buck the trends, and there are always different beliefs that can be found if you focus on a different village, region, nation or continent.lycancomplex wrote:Is there proof that lubin were usually female.
I recall hearing / reading that when a werewolf dies it will almost always rise again as a vampire, but this is the first suggestion I've heard connecting the idea with the Lubin.lycancomplex wrote:What about the myth that when a werewolf dies he becomes a undead werewolf? THE LUBIN
Well, the only books I have in front of me are Brad Steiger's (flawed) The Werewolf Book and Brian J Frost's The Essential Guide to Werewolf Literature. Both discuss the idea of the Greek Vrykolakas, which is a term used for both a vampire and a werewolf. Further, Frost's book, on page 14 states "Even then the werewolf's reign of terror may not be over; in some parts of Eastern Europe it is believed that a man who has been a werewolf in his life becomes a vampire after death." He goes on to note that Wilhelm Hertz' scholarly 1862 work Der Werwolf sites a German legend that a werewolf, upon burial, will revove, devour its own flesh, and rise from the grave to suck the blood out of cattle and humans to satisfy its hunger.dnl wrote:I think that came from the move Draculer. There are no legands I have read that talk about it.
Steiger's book is quite flawed. Just try looking up the entries that refer to werewolf bites. He has one entry saying that folklore werewolves do create more werewolves through bites, while a different entry explained that they do not and why people mistakenly have often passed on this piece of fakelore. When a book contradicts itself, you know it's trouble.Kavik wrote:Well, the only books I have in front of me are Brad Steiger's (flawed) The Werewolf Book and Brian J Frost's The Essential Guide to Werewolf Literature. Both discuss the idea of the Greek Vrykolakas, which is a term used for both a vampire and a werewolf. Further, Frost's book, on page 14 states "Even then the werewolf's reign of terror may not be over; in some parts of Eastern Europe it is believed that a man who has been a werewolf in his life becomes a vampire after death." He goes on to note that Wilhelm Hertz' scholarly 1862 work Der Werwolf sites a German legend that a werewolf, upon burial, will revove, devour its own flesh, and rise from the grave to suck the blood out of cattle and humans to satisfy its hunger.dnl wrote:I think that came from the move Draculer. There are no legands I have read that talk about it.
Oh, I know Steiger's book is messed up, but the sheer volume of info in it that I haven't found elsewhere made it worth getting (yes, I realize that buying a book for data which is suspect is bad logic and encourages the publishers to spew out more inaccurate books; sometimes I just gotta buy the werewolf stuff to encourage publishers to spew out more werewolf stuff). Frost is much better, and has at least two books on the subject.Jamie wrote:Steiger's book is quite flawed. Just try looking up the entries that refer to werewolf bites. He has one entry saying that folklore werewolves do create more werewolves through bites, while a different entry explained that they do not and why people mistakenly have often passed on this piece of fakelore. When a book contradicts itself, you know it's trouble.
If I remember right, the Greek Vrykolakas literally translates as "werewolf" but is not applied to werewolves despite its entymology. Scolars think that it was once the word for werewolf, but was applied to vampires when werewolves began being referred to by other names.
I'm going by memory here, I might be thinking of a different word. I've seen better explanations in vampire books than in werewolf books. I'm thinking that "Werewolf and Vampire in Romania" by Harry Senn may have a bit about this. It certainly has a lot of information about werewolves and vampires in eastern Europe in general, not just in Romania.
The Harry Senn book does talk about Romanian werewolves and vampires, but it also talks about other werewolf and vampire beliefs, and about Eastern European folklore in general (including even a bit about dragons and fairies). I remember that this book had a whole bunch of stuff about the relationship between the folkloric werewolf and the folkloric vampire, and that it was extremely scholarly, well-researched and one of the most accurate pieces of werewolf nonfiction I've read. Therefore, I believe there's a good chance that the werewolf/vampire entymology question is resolved, or at least discussed, within it. It is an exceptionally rare book that usually costs about $70 on those rare times that it is available. Interlibrary loan is your best bet.Kavik wrote:Oh, I know Steiger's book is messed up, but the sheer volume of info in it that I haven't found elsewhere made it worth getting (yes, I realize that buying a book for data which is suspect is bad logic and encourages the publishers to spew out more inaccurate books; sometimes I just gotta buy the werewolf stuff to encourage publishers to spew out more werewolf stuff). Frost is much better, and has at least two books on the subject.Jamie wrote:Steiger's book is quite flawed. Just try looking up the entries that refer to werewolf bites. He has one entry saying that folklore werewolves do create more werewolves through bites, while a different entry explained that they do not and why people mistakenly have often passed on this piece of fakelore. When a book contradicts itself, you know it's trouble.
If I remember right, the Greek Vrykolakas literally translates as "werewolf" but is not applied to werewolves despite its entymology. Scolars think that it was once the word for werewolf, but was applied to vampires when werewolves began being referred to by other names.
I'm going by memory here, I might be thinking of a different word. I've seen better explanations in vampire books than in werewolf books. I'm thinking that "Werewolf and Vampire in Romania" by Harry Senn may have a bit about this. It certainly has a lot of information about werewolves and vampires in eastern Europe in general, not just in Romania.
I'm not familiar with Harry Senn. He wrote a book titled "Werewolf and Vampire in Romania" that doesn't talk about Romanian werewolves and vampires?
The best thing about Steiger's book is the timeline, which he stole most of from Adam Douglas' The Beast Within.Jamie wrote:The Harry Senn book does talk about Romanian werewolves and vampires, but it also talks about other werewolf and vampire beliefs, and about Eastern European folklore in general (including even a bit about dragons and fairies). I remember that this book had a whole bunch of stuff about the relationship between the folkloric werewolf and the folkloric vampire, and that it was extremely scholarly, well-researched and one of the most accurate pieces of werewolf nonfiction I've read. Therefore, I believe there's a good chance that the werewolf/vampire entymology question is resolved, or at least discussed, within it. It is an exceptionally rare book that usually costs about $70 on those rare times that it is available. Interlibrary loan is your best bet.
As to Steiger, I must plead guilty to buying a copy too. I'm ashamed of myself, but there it is. The book makes me mad as heck sometimes, but it does have enough information to be (barely) worth the price for a werewolf research fanatic like myself.
Actually, I wasn't able to afford a copy of the Harry Senn book, but needed to own one, so I finally photocopied the whole book. At 5 cents a page it was economical in comparison to the really expensive market price, and it was legal too (according to copyright law, researchers may photocopy ONE copy of anything, if they only use it for research purposes and don't share it with others; without said exception, I'd be pretty bad off, because some books I need to refer to again and again, and they are so rare they are super-expensive, or even not available at any price).Kavik wrote:The best thing about Steiger's book is the timeline, which he stole most of from Adam Douglas' The Beast Within.Jamie wrote:The Harry Senn book does talk about Romanian werewolves and vampires, but it also talks about other werewolf and vampire beliefs, and about Eastern European folklore in general (including even a bit about dragons and fairies). I remember that this book had a whole bunch of stuff about the relationship between the folkloric werewolf and the folkloric vampire, and that it was extremely scholarly, well-researched and one of the most accurate pieces of werewolf nonfiction I've read. Therefore, I believe there's a good chance that the werewolf/vampire entymology question is resolved, or at least discussed, within it. It is an exceptionally rare book that usually costs about $70 on those rare times that it is available. Interlibrary loan is your best bet.
As to Steiger, I must plead guilty to buying a copy too. I'm ashamed of myself, but there it is. The book makes me mad as heck sometimes, but it does have enough information to be (barely) worth the price for a werewolf research fanatic like myself.
Harry Senn's book is a source for Jamie Hall's Half Human / Half Animal, which I found pretty useful (even though its werewolf section is all-too brief). I may have to seek it out myself, as I'm not overly fond of Interlibrary Loans (I usually only get a week, non-renewable, with the book, and for my purposes I prefer more regular access, being a therianthropologist and all that).
I've done that a few times, mostly back in college. The only thing I've photocopied for werewolf research purposes was Alexandre Dumas' The Wolf Leader (hasn't been published in English in 50 years) ... which I used InterLibrary Loan to acquire.Jamie wrote:Actually, I wasn't able to afford a copy of the Harry Senn book, but needed to own one, so I finally photocopied the whole book. At 5 cents a page it was economical in comparison to the really expensive market price, and it was legal too (according to copyright law, researchers may photocopy ONE copy of anything, if they only use it for research purposes and don't share it with others; without said exception, I'd be pretty bad off, because some books I need to refer to again and again, and they are so rare they are super-expensive, or even not available at any price).