No no, you're doing it wrong, like this *clears throat...*ABrownrigg wrote:WOW.. such drama!
What's this ruckus?!
The Meeper.
No no, you're doing it wrong, like this *clears throat...*ABrownrigg wrote:WOW.. such drama!
Who are you calling a kid?!?!?!?1?!?one?! You are a cad and a bounder sir. *buaps AB up side the head with a well aimed duckie* Take that! *buaps AB up side the head with another well aimed duckie* And that! And let that be a lesson to you.ABrownrigg wrote:HEy you kids!! Get outta my green beans!!
... Oohhh get in line.*buaps AB up side the head with a well aimed duckie* Take that! *buaps AB up side the head with another well aimed duckie* And that! And let that be a lesson to you.
How dare you be cool calm and measured, it is no trivial matter, no wait, or is that no laughing matter? Oh heavens I'm forgetting my classic movie lines now, oh well, sorry about the trolls by the way, I'll try not to eat any more, I promise .ABrownrigg wrote:... Oohhh get in line.*buaps AB up side the head with a well aimed duckie* Take that! *buaps AB up side the head with another well aimed duckie* And that! And let that be a lesson to you.
AB
The werewolves in Inhuman would disagree. Because, if you hadn't given her lycanthropy, she wouldn't be capable of killing an innocent in such a way.lovec1990 wrote:for responsability im gona say this one more time: im responsible for her becoming werewolf, but im not responsible for her actions and if she kills innocent person i might feel that i could be the couse for what hapened, but im not responsible for that.
Police also aren't likely to have "werewolf" on their list of possible motives.lovec1990 wrote:if anonmity is imprtant so this means no killing because killing and anonxmity works only in books and movies, but in reality police will investigate and in modern days is easy too find evidence(witness,video fotage from ATM,Shoping mall,etc.) because not all WWs live close too woods some would live in city.
What I would, and would not do.ABrownrigg wrote:Dilemma.. holding someone against their will.. at least until they can explain to her what's going on.. What would you do? let her go without explaining? or hold her against her will until she knows the truth.
You should still have to take responsibility for it. The pack should be willing to forgive a werewolf who pleads to them for help, but saying "Sorry, I goofed" does not automatically absolve someone of all responsibility.lovec1990 wrote:Terastas i agree with your view, but your sounds like you talking for willingly turning her what about if you are new at this you know, practicing first change at will and you accidentaly infect her ?
Terastas wrote:You should still have to take responsibility for it. The pack should be willing to forgive a werewolf who pleads to them for help, but saying "Sorry, I goofed" does not automatically absolve someone of all responsibility.lovec1990 wrote:Terastas i agree with your view, but your sounds like you talking for willingly turning her what about if you are new at this you know, practicing first change at will and you accidentaly infect her ?
Even dumb kids watching Qubo can tell you that going to an adult (or in this case, a senior pack mate) counts as being responsible. But there's a world of difference between admitting that you're in over your head and in desperate need of help, and declaring "Not my problem" and leaving them to handle it.
I was merely prolonging the explanation of the situation to fit in with the way it was set up in Freeborn. Directly attending to Brownrigg's question of the morality of holding someone against their will, in other words.Terastas wrote:If the idea is to keep the time they are held against their will as short as possible, why so much evading around the question? Wouldn't it be better to just come right out with it instead of expecting her to stay for two or three days without any answers? If you want her to comply, she needs to hear at least the basics as soon as possible... Making her feel genuinely held against her will is counterproductive in the long term...
Well that would be something she didn't need to know. You could tell her she was bitten by a werewolf but leave out the part about debating what to do with her.Fabricator wrote:The scene in Freeborn shows Sherri being held against her will because the present pack were still discussing what should be done about her after she awoke.
Skimmed the other points briefly, but I want to answer this without having my thoughts too influenced. I' will poke at the other answers after this.ABrownrigg wrote:This was started on another thread, but was suggested it be better placed here,.
Let me explain the scenario.
IN Freeborn.. Sherri, (like in the original movie script) is bitten accidentally.. by what she thinks is just a natural wolf.. she passes out from the attack.. but not killed.. The wolf in question panics and contacts some more experienced wolves to step in.
they carry her to their own safehouse.. and have a discussion on what to do with her. When she wakes up.. she's under the impression that she's been kidnapped.. screaming to be let go.
Dilemma.. holding someone against their will.. at least until they can explain to her what's going on.. What would you do? let her go without explaining? or hold her against her will until she knows the truth.