Therianthrope Info
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 8:56 pm
This is the home of united werewolf fans across the globe. Searching to improve the image of the werewolf in popular culture, known as... The Pack
https://thepack.network/thepackboard/
Ahem. No. I remember when they started to switch everything over. It was to get away from all the crap that went with the word "were", like the association with physical shifting. It was an attempt to get people to take them a little more seriously.(The word were was also common for some time, as a reference to other part human part animal shapeshifting creatures of legend such as werewolves, weretigers and the like, but is much less common these days. One reason might be a growing consensus and wider awareness that the prefix simply means "man", and not "part human, part ___", as is often assumed)
These are not commonly used terms. Most therians do not experience these, with the exception of the dream shift, which is usually called just that - a dream shift - regardless of lucidity (or lack thereof). There also doesn't seem to be much of a distinction between personality and mental shifts. Aside from a brief mention in a few articles here and there I've never seen the term used.Shift Sub-Types
Aura
Berserker
Bi-Location
Lucid Dream
Personality
Shadow
Again, not common terms. Until now I've never even seen the word "antherion". Don't expect to come across it.Related Terms
Antherions
Poly-shifter
These are more commonly known in otherkin circles as polymorphs. They are also sometimes referred to as metamorphs, white boards, or chameleons.Poly-shifter
I've never met a single therian who's described this, though I have seen it pop up in the occasional article or book - usually a badly written one.Newly awakened Therians often experience dreams in which they are being chased by their theriotype,often resulting in them being caught and devoured.In these cases,most report a feeling of inner peace and oneness with the animal.The current popular theory is that this is a subconscious attempt to meld the human and animal aspects of the individual.
Yeah, that...doesn't happen.Speech and simple everyday tasks may become difficult as they become disassociated from their human aspect.
See above. While I've heard of things like this, I've never come across an instance where it's actually happened.The most intense or deep shifts result in a complete animal mentality for the duration.They lose the capability for speech and act and move in the manner of their theriotype.All capability for rational human thought is lost.
This is probably me. I had no idea there was a name for it in the therianthrope community and I don't really associate it with therianthropy online community terms either, but that's just me. But Im not really sure, I just know I can shift into what I like, and have many memories of such creatures.Poly-Shifter
There are some Therians that claim that they have no specific theriotype, and that they can shift to any animal should the occasion or wish to do so arise. Even so,they often have 'favourite' animals which they shift to most for preference.They are sometimes referred to as Shape-Shifters.
To find such a person in the therianthrope community is rare. You're alot more likely to run into them on otherkin forums. Because of their nature (and partly due to the attitude of some therians) they tend to gravitate to the otherkin, who are more accepting of them.Kirk Hammett wrote:This is probably me. I had no idea there was a name for it in the therianthrope community and I don't really associate it with therianthropy online community terms either, but that's just me.Poly-Shifter
There are some Therians that claim that they have no specific theriotype, and that they can shift to any animal should the occasion or wish to do so arise. Even so,they often have 'favourite' animals which they shift to most for preference.They are sometimes referred to as Shape-Shifters.
Silverfan wrote:*looks around* Me?? no never hehe.Yes it was me.He asked a few questions so i figure.Hey what the hoo and sent it.lol.I hope it helps answer some questions. Now on a seriuos note.The person who showed me this.Compiled all the info.I think she did a very good job and has shared it in a few places.Im glad I was betten to the post .
![]()
*nips Firestorm* Miss me hehehe
MoonKit wrote:
So youve read "The Magick of Shapeshifting" ? I recognize some of that info from that book.Very well worded though.
MoonKit wrote:Wow, Figarou...didnt know weres/therians were such a touchy subject on this site.Ill remember that.
There is nothing wrong with this thread.Silverfan wrote:Now not to be disrespectfull.But what is wrong with this thread.Its a open and general discussion of wer-kin and theians. Maby some arnt as openminded as most.
Actually, that isn't as bad as it could be. It doesn't even really contain that much info, accurate or not. The section about weres was fair, in my opinion.Morkulv wrote:You guys should take a look at this site:
www.otherkin.com
And be aware: the people on that site are serious, and won't tolerate people claiming werewolves don't exist. And like I said, its not a bullsh1t-site.
I will keep this in mind, thanksTo find such a person in the therianthrope community is rare. You're alot more likely to run into them on otherkin forums. Because of their nature (and partly due to the attitude of some therians) they tend to gravitate to the otherkin, who are more accepting of them.
Polymorphs (which, by the way, is the most common term for them) are generally considered otherkin, not therians.
I didn't say it was a bad site, but I can imagine 'non-believers' on this site to go to the board and post against everything that is written in that site. And I haven't had a close look at the vampire-section yet... What's so bad about it?Merrypaws wrote:Actually, that isn't as bad as it could be. It doesn't even really contain that much info, accurate or not. The section about weres was fair, in my opinion.Morkulv wrote:You guys should take a look at this site:
www.otherkin.com
And be aware: the people on that site are serious, and won't tolerate people claiming werewolves don't exist. And like I said, its not a bullsh1t-site.
It wasn't untill I took a peek at the vampire section that I found myself rolling my eyes.
Just a drop in the ocean of internet.
First, they have it split between vampires and "vampyres".Morkulv wrote:And I haven't had a close look at the vampire-section yet... What's so bad about it?
The vampyre section reeks of roleplay.The difference between vampires and vampyres is that vampires are mortal. This includes the group of Sanguinarian, PSI, emotional, sexual, social and elemental vampires. The major difference between vampires and vampyres is that vampires cannot make or turn other vampires.