What should a werewolf consist of?
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2020 8:17 pm
- Custom Title: Helper
- Gender: Male
What should a werewolf consist of?
My opinion and my world, a werewolf can consist of anything that has wolf-like features.
- Meeper
- Legendary
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:07 pm
- Custom Title: Friendly Neighbourhood Meeper
- Gender: Male
- Additional Details: Wannabe mad scientist.
- Mood: Busy
Re: What should a werewolf consist of?
Yeah I'd go along with that. I mean sure, there's typically going to be a knowledge Vs. perception angle; if perception says it's a werewolf but knowledge says it's sheep genetics, or it looks like a sheep but has wolf genes (not to mention who gets to decide the significance of this stuff anyway?) then there's going to be tension depending who you ask. But still, yep.
The Meeper.
The Meeper.
While the empty can may rattle the most, of equal or potentially greater import is what the reputably quiet cans are really full of.
All names are but souvenirs, in the end. Make good of your stay, so that they hold happy memories ~ Some guy.
Wise men speak because they have something to say. Fools speak because they have to say something.
To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
All names are but souvenirs, in the end. Make good of your stay, so that they hold happy memories ~ Some guy.
Wise men speak because they have something to say. Fools speak because they have to say something.
To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
- Chance
- Legendary
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 12:41 am
- Gender: Female
- Additional Details: There is joy in everything you do, you just have to realize it's there so you can embrace it.
- Mood: Happy
Re: What should a werewolf consist of?
A proper name. We use were and attach it to wolf. I don't honestly think that makes much sense. Look up the word were and you find a host of ways to use it, but even as a state of being I don't think the word were should be attached the way it is. From what google tells me,lol. It shoud be Werwolf. Manwolf. Sure we don't use old english nowadays but those words actually work when put together. Because each is it's own charater. Man and wolf, two state of beings. Not second person singular past, plural past, and past subjunctive of be, stuck to a being.
Does that make sense. I'm not sure
Does that make sense. I'm not sure
Avatar Not My Work