What the female transformation should look like?

sybersamurai · Post by **sybersamurai** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:03 am

THIS SHOT should definately be in the film, clothes ripping would be awesome after this at some point... I think this is exactly the sort of stuff people have been waiting for again in a werewolf movie. And for the love of god don't f' up the female transformation SEQUENCE.. It's time to break NEW ground not cut corners and deliver half-a**...
Lobo leo did a great job with this art, too !!

sybersamurai · Post by **sybersamurai** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:04 am

OH sorry, my stupid self forgot to post the link... d'oh

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/41878560/

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:44 am

There happens to be a disscussion about that already.

http://calypso-blue.com/werewolf/viewtopic.php?t=3640

Vuldari · Post by **Vuldari** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 1:40 pm

Hey..."WELCOME TO THE PACK" sybersamurai ...

If you follow Figarous link, you will be pleased to know that the shot you posted WILL be in the film.

...in fact...LoboLeo created that perticular photomanipulation specificly for this film project, as a concept for how it possibly could be done.

sybersamurai · Post by **sybersamurai** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:30 pm

Thanks to the both of you and this is very good to hear.... long live the pack! Many howls to all

MoonKit · Post by **MoonKit** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:43 am

TECHNICALLY that shot is not going to be in the film as she is not the actual actress...but something very close to it.

Vuldari · Post by **Vuldari** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:03 am

MoonKit wrote:TECHNICALLY that shot is not going to be in the film as she is not the actual actress...but something very close to it.

I wrote:...as a concept for how it possibly could be done.

I know...I tried to be clear on that.

RedEye · Post by **RedEye** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 11:34 pm

What should the Female transformation look like?
The male transformation,only with Breasts....and heavy breathing from the male part of the audience.

CrewWolf · Post by **CrewWolf** » Sun Nov 05, 2006 8:44 pm

I imagine it would look a lot like a male transformation but with more awkward, yet conveniently placed, positioning of the limbs and scenery. (Rating has little bearing since it would still be awkward whether it's G or R; the only effect it would have is on what the awkward positioning emphasizes).

howlbigbadwolf · Post by **howlbigbadwolf** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:10 am

ya in other words it would be sexy

PariahPoet · Post by **PariahPoet** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:25 pm

I'm about tired of people turning female weres into a fetish.
I have a feeling that if it was real it wouldn't go the way you think it would. You're sitting there oggling at her changing and she becomes just a muscular as a male were and goes for your throat before you know what hit you.

MoonHunter · Post by **MoonHunter** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 12:46 pm

PariahPoet wrote: I'm about tired of people turning female weres into a fetish.
I have a feeling that if it was real it wouldn't go the way you think it would. You're sitting there oggling at her changing and she becomes just a muscular as a male were and goes for your throat before you know what hit you.

No clue what's going on here, but owch, that would hurt.

Lena · Post by **Lena** » Sat Dec 02, 2006 11:48 pm

Okay, mebbe I am just dense, but wolfs and dogs (among MANY mammals) only exhibit boobs if they are pregnant or gave birth and are nursing young, so would not human female to werewolf lack these, unless she was had child or nursing?

PariahPoet · Post by **PariahPoet** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 1:05 am

Indeed they would.

JoshuaMadoc · Post by **JoshuaMadoc** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 3:30 am

I just draw my female lycanthropes with breasts, no matter what size. If i didn't i'd have people complain to me that i only draw metrosexual male lycanthropes.

Try ranting about THAT.

PariahPoet · Post by **PariahPoet** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:46 am

That happens when you try to cater to the furaffinity crowd.
I left after the argument over whether or not to allow cub porn. I don't want to associate myself with a group where that is even debatable.

JoshuaMadoc · Post by **JoshuaMadoc** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:52 pm

PariahPoet wrote:That happens when you try to cater to the furaffinity crowd.
I left after the argument over whether or not to allow cub porn. I don't want to associate myself with a group where that is even debatable.

Haha! That "debate" was such a f*** waste of my insignificant time. In fact, i couldn't give two dead ratfuls of s*** to what happens anymore, and i'd tell anyone who thinks i'm a pedo for staying in FA to die along with Jehovah's Witness.

PariahPoet · Post by **PariahPoet** » Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:54 pm

That's your decision. I know a lot of good clean artists who decided to stay. But I know that Godhatesfurries or Somethingawful will catch wind of that whole fiasco and I don't want to be around when that happens. That's why I left.

RedEye · Post by **RedEye** » Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:04 am

The arguent that only a pregnant or nursing Female Werewolf would have breasts is somewhat pointless. The base clade is that of a Homo Sapiens Simiensis female, and they have breasts whether they are nursing, pregnant or not.
Homo Sapiens Lupens, drawing on the Homo. Sap. Sim. as a source would probably have to include those breasts, as they are part of the general genoset; but one suspects that these secondary sexual organs would be quite smaller in the Lupens form, say; going from a "C"-cup to an "A"-cup in size as the fascia underneath the Mammae grew along with the ribcage.
Given, say; a Homo Sap.Sim. with a 32" chest and breasts that are 35" at their widest circumfrence (a "C"-cup), taking the ribs to a 42" chest size would reduce the amount of breast material to around 43"-44" in size: an "A"-cup dimension.
She would still have breasts, but she could take corners a lot faster.

Lena · Post by **Lena** » Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:22 am

I have no trouble taking corners... Unless slow man is in front of me.

ChaosWolf · Post by **ChaosWolf** » Wed Dec 06, 2006 12:47 pm

I thought general concensus would be that, yes, chest--size would be reduced, but not enough that it would be difficult distinguishing genders? Factoring in the furry covering, a C-cup plummeting to an A-cup would be hard to notice post-transformation. Using the example C-cup, reducing down to a B would make for a vivid difference, but not enough that the sole gender-identifications are relative height and muscle-mass.