Page 1 of 2
GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 7:05 pm
by MattSullivan
Why? Coz it's cute, and it's pretty damn good. Not Pixar-good, but still good. And don't be turned off by the fact it's a Disney movie.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 7:12 pm
by Baphnedia
Oh wait! Bolt came out this weekend!
*hides back under his rock*
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:20 pm
by Xiroteus
It looks entertaining.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:56 pm
by IndianaJones
It looks good, better than the other stupid dog movie.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:04 pm
by MattSullivan
It aint werewolves..but it's still very good :}
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:07 am
by Baphnedia
It was good! And there were no Chihuahuas!
/spoiler
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:21 am
by PariahPoet
I want to see it, but I think it's a rental.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:02 pm
by Terastas
Baphnedia wrote:It was good! And there were no Chihuahuas!
/spoiler
*nods* It's unfortunate that this has to compete directly with
Twilight while that absolute piece-o-crap was the only escapist movie available during the heaviest of the market woes.

That is apparently God's sense of humor at work.
I know it seems like a pretty shallow excuse, but I do have at least two other reasons not to see
Bolt apart from the fact that I'm broke.
1) John Travolta the Scientology poster boy.
2) Miley Cyrus the uppity brat.
Again, it's unfortunate. I probably would be eager to see this movie were those two lunks not attached to it.

It's like Tom Cruise in
Valkyrie or Steve Carrell in
Over the Hedge; I probably would have seen those in theaters if I could stomach their involvement.
So, uh. . . Yeah, rental for me too.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:00 pm
by Xiroteus
1) John Travolta the Scientology poster boy.
2) Miley Cyrus the uppity brat.
Why can they not just hire anyone that can do a good job to do the voices, they always have to get a name someone knows, It really does not matter, not going to movies for who the actor is or who does the voice.
Not that it bothers me all that much.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:17 pm
by Baphnedia
In the case of Miley Cyrus, it's to further develop her 'career'. Disney will probably take her from musician, to voice actor, to regular actor in the next few years and then Hannah Montanize her.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:01 am
by MattSullivan
Fine. be close minded and DON'T see it for stupid reasons. John Travolta was great in the film, and I'm NOT a big fan of his. Miley Cyrus was fine too. It's a GOOD movie. See it! You'll like it.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:18 am
by Vagrant
Well I'd like to see it, so don't feel too bad, Matt.
Though I find the irony in this case rather irksome, as I have no idea when the movie plans to show up here in ol' Blighty, but I'll keep an eye open for it.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 12:42 am
by Xiroteus
MattSullivan wrote:Fine. be close minded and DON'T see it for stupid reasons. John Travolta was great in the film, and I'm NOT a big fan of his. Miley Cyrus was fine too. It's a GOOD movie. See it! You'll like it.
I sure never let the voice actors dictate if I see a movie, most the time whoever they get does a fine job, it looks good and I would like to see it.
My statement was just regarding who they tend to get in general for animated films, about them making a point of getting names we know of, like it is suppose to matter, no problem either way.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:31 am
by vrikasatma
Xiroteus wrote:Why can they not just hire anyone that can do a good job to do the voices, they always have to get a name someone knows...
That bothers me, too. Voice acting is a craft in and of itself. The actors/actresses took pains to keep their voices and characterizations in top shape. Many, like Mel Blanc and Thurl Ravenscroft, had vocal tracts as well-developed as the greatest opera singers.
It lets other-talented actors into the creative process. Voice actors don't
have to be comely, just sound great.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:27 pm
by MattSullivan
Yes, but in this case the celebrity voice overs were, surisingly, very good.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:54 pm
by Xiroteus
I have not noticed any bad ones to date, at least none that I recall.
If the story looks good.

Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:07 pm
by Figarou
vrikasatma wrote:Xiroteus wrote:Why can they not just hire anyone that can do a good job to do the voices, they always have to get a name someone knows...
That bothers me, too. Voice acting is a craft in and of itself. The actors/actresses took pains to keep their voices and characterizations in top shape. Many, like Mel Blanc and Thurl Ravenscroft, had vocal tracts as well-developed as the greatest opera singers.
It lets other-talented actors into the creative process. Voice actors don't
have to be comely, just sound great.
I really don't care WHO does the voice acting. As long as they do a good job.
But.....I do find it odd to have several characters in different films having the exact same voice. For example....Eddie Murphy did the voice of the small dragon in Mulan and Donkey in Shrek.
I also don't like it when the character has a completely different voice in the sequel.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:34 pm
by Terastas
MattSullivan wrote:Fine. be close minded and DON'T see it for stupid reasons. John Travolta was great in the film, and I'm NOT a big fan of his. Miley Cyrus was fine too. It's a GOOD movie. See it! You'll like it.
Well, like I said, those were add-ons to my great big budget issue. With my current situation, I'm averaging one movie in theaters a year.
So those are not so much reasons why I refuse to see the movie, but rather reasons why my one movie a year is going to be something else. Like I said, it's a rental for me.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 8:35 am
by Vagrant
A small revival to this thread, because I managed to watch Bolt. Hooray!
(I warn now that this post may be slightly spoiler-laden, I never quite grasped the concept of what is and what isn't a spoiler, so at your own risk and all that.)
Past the intro, it's a fairly typical buddy movie, but I didn't really mind so much because the characters were done very well, it was definitely of Pixar quality, no doubt in my mind about that. I had a laugh (and once or twice I had to suppress the urge to wail like a newborn), and loved every moment of it.
It's really worth the entry price for the psychotic fan-Hamster alone, who provided most of the laugh-out-loud moments of the film, for me at least.
Footnote: And frankly, Bolt's quite the handsome hunk of a canid when he enters into his protector mindset, he's got this Goliath aura about him that I was rather fond of, strong yet amazingly naive and full of wonder.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 10:56 am
by Kaebora
Terastas wrote:
1) John Travolta the Scientology poster boy.
I typically thought that Tom Cruise already took that poster boy role.
In all seriousness, religous (or cult) beleifs are not a good enough reason to avoid seeing acters on the screen. They've already been paid, so it's not like you're boycotting them. I'll watch their movies, but I wont discuss religon with them.
Oh well, off topic it seems. I haven't seen Bolt yet, but will inevitably wait until I can rent it. I have other movies I'd rather see in theaters at the moment.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:43 am
by Uniform Two Six
Meh... I swore I'd never go see another Tom Cruise movie again after that South Park B.S. (blackmailing a production company in violation of his contractual obligations because he didn't like a parody they did is something that still ticks me off... religious gaytard...). Anyway, as much as I hate Tom Cruise, even I have to admit that Valkeryie looks awesome. I may have to compromise my principles (again) and go see it.
Come to the dark side... We have cookies.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 9:43 pm
by *nagowteena*
I've gotta say it was very entertaining!
I loved the movie.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:34 pm
by Terastas
Kaebora wrote:I typically thought that Tom Cruise already took that poster boy role.
Both he and Tom Cruise are heavy into Scientology, though only the latter is in your face about it. According to one of Travolta's co-stars from
Wild Hogs (either Tim Allen or William H. Macy -- can't remember which), working with Travolta is kind of like working with a cat or a bratty rich kid in that he just does whatever he feels like doing and nuts to you if that doesn't work for you.
The example he cited on the Tonight Show was when, right before they were going to shoot a scene, Travolta decided out of the blue that he wasn't going to say any of his lines. Not that he'd forgotten them or didn't like them; he just didn't feel like doing it. It was a scene with Ray Liotta, one of my heroes, no less. I don't care how rich you are; it's never excusable to screw with anyone's time and money, much less in the presence of individuals that could do a better job than you and for less.

So while Tom Cruise has indeed become the face of Scientology through his preachy in-your-face antics, John Travolta's closer to the true face of it.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:32 am
by Xiroteus
This was a good film, I liked the 3D as well, nice feel to it, first time using non blue and red glasses for anything, it was worth going to, next, the DVD release, I will get the two disc set for this.
Re: GO SEE BOLT
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:34 pm
by Fullmoonstar