outwarddoodles wrote:I like the one Vilkacis had suggested.
Werewolf in llama's clothing.What!?! I don't brag about my position. Take this you werewolf wanna be llama!!
you mean a llama in werewolf's clothing.
NUR!!
I don't know how easy or hard it would be to implement these, but here are a couple custom title mods available for phpBB:Figarou wrote:The thing about having a custom title is that I have to assign it to that person.
I have to create a new rank, type in the info, then assign it.
It'll be best if we have more titles under legendary.
Vilkacis wrote:
I don't know how easy or hard it would be to implement these, but here are a couple custom title mods available for phpBB:
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.ph ... tom+titles
http://www.phpbbhacks.com/download/1178
Those are interesting titles.Vilkacis wrote:In the meantime, how about these titles:
0-4: Nothing
5-9: Just Bitten
10-19: First Change
20-29: Dealing with the Change
30-49: Junior Pack Member
50-99: Pack Member
100-174: Senior Pack Member
175-299: Pack Leader
300-449: Pack Elder
450-599: Renowned
600+: Legendary
Note: I adjusted the scale a bit. This will make it so that only three members are Legendary right now, but that number is going to increase soon, I imagine, as there are three more in the 500 range, plus a dozen more regular posters standing at over 300.
Look good?
-- Vilkacis
me two chanage it like thisAki wrote:I like this one. ^_^Vilkacis wrote:0 - 4 (No Moons - No title)
5 - 9 (Just Bitten)
10 - 19 (Dealing with the Change)
20 - 29 (Pack Member)
30 - 49 (Pack Leader)
50 - 99 (Pack Elder)
100 - 149 (Legendary/Custom Title)
150 - 199 (Legendary/Custom Title)
200 - 299 (Legendary/Custom Title)
300 - 399 (Legendary/Custom Title)
400+ (Legendary/Custom Title)
Moderator
Administrator
-- Vilkacis
Goldenwolf, Stormdancer and ABrownrigg spoke out strongly against it; there were also a few other expressions of dislike, though of a smaller magnitude, along with a fair number who expressed regret at having lost Legendary status.Shadowblaze wrote:Wait a minute, what? i thought they were the stretchy scale... why aren't they? who didn't like it?
it starts here.WereDog wrote:but what were theyre arguments? where if it is, is it posted here on the forum?
Actually, it starts earlier in the thread than that, but the one you pointed to is the first outright argument against.
Hmmm, that's actually not a bad scale there. I like that a lot better. Makes more sense to me and stuff. I don't need to be Legendary, I just like to be recognized as a participating pack member.Vilkacis wrote: 0-4: Nothing
5-9: Just Bitten
10-19: First Change
20-29: Dealing with the Change
30-49: Junior Pack Member
50-99: Pack Member
100-174: Senior Pack Member
175-299: Pack Leader
300-449: Pack Elder
450-599: Renowned
600+: Legendary