GoldenWolf's Site is back up an looks AWESOME!!

Teh_DarkJokerWolf · Post by **Teh_DarkJokerWolf** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:02 pm

http://www.goldenwolfen.com/

Scott Gardener · Post by **Scott Gardener** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:16 pm

Looks sharper than ever!

KittyRose · Post by **KittyRose** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:24 pm

Loving It!!

DarkShadow · Post by **DarkShadow** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:30 pm

It was worht waiting for for sure

Morkulv · Post by **Morkulv** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:31 pm

It actually looks very much the same, as well as the art.

MoonKit · Post by **MoonKit** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:04 pm

Much prettier though the labels on the art pages are a little skewed to me. There are werewolves in the wolf ones and foxes in the anthropomorphic ones. Im sure theres a system!

Fullmoonstar · Post by **Fullmoonstar** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:48 pm

yeah...i saw this yesterday

the new design of her site is just breathtaking awesome...and there are some pictures i have never seen before

great new site

tyger · Post by **tyger** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:13 pm

oooh spifftastic!

ravaged_warrior · Post by **ravaged_warrior** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:43 pm

I like the Flash-based art viewer, very cool. I also like how they're in categories now.

Aki · Post by **Aki** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:51 am

It's pretty cool, though I dislike the flash. Flash has never been something I've really liked in website design. Few uses of it for such have been liked by me.

In this instance, I dislike it because you can't, for instance, save a picture to your HD for whatever reason (for example, I simply like collecting lots of pretty pictures) or set one as a background or whatever. You can't, also, link to a picture to show someone, or use the [IMG] tags of a forum to show off the picture without using a hyper link.

Just my two cents, I figured I'd be less "OMG Cool!" and more "It's very cool, but...." because it is very nice to get to see some of the older (and newest) stuff.

Set · Post by **Set** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:18 pm

Aki wrote:In this instance, I dislike it because you can't, for instance, save a picture to your HD for whatever reason (for example, I simply like collecting lots of pretty pictures) or set one as a background or whatever. You can't, also, link to a picture to show someone, or use the [IMG] tags of a forum to show off the picture without using a hyper link.

Considering how much of her art gets STOLEN, she probably had them do it that way for that very reason.

KittyRose · Post by **KittyRose** » Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:39 pm

Set wrote:
Aki wrote:In this instance, I dislike it because you can't, for instance, save a picture to your HD for whatever reason (for example, I simply like collecting lots of pretty pictures) or set one as a background or whatever. You can't, also, link to a picture to show someone, or use the [IMG] tags of a forum to show off the picture without using a hyper link.
Considering how much of her art gets STOLEN, she probably had them do it that way for that very reason.

I agree with Set, her art does get stolen, unfortunately. She's just trying to protect her artwork from art theives.

Aki · Post by **Aki** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:06 am

Set wrote:
Aki wrote:In this instance, I dislike it because you can't, for instance, save a picture to your HD for whatever reason (for example, I simply like collecting lots of pretty pictures) or set one as a background or whatever. You can't, also, link to a picture to show someone, or use the [IMG] tags of a forum to show off the picture without using a hyper link.
Considering how much of her art gets STOLEN, she probably had them do it that way for that very reason.

I had considered that, but really, one cannot prevent that. It is the internet. Even if the mighty screen shot not available, some people are surprisingly crafty with code. That said, screen shot is available, any dolt with a functional print screen key, MS paint or better, and time can steal the images all the same.

It is, ultimately, a useless, if flashy, feature if intended for security of images.

Set · Post by **Set** » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:55 pm

Most art thieves wouldn't bother, they're too lazy. That's why they steal art in the first place.

Aki · Post by **Aki** » Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:59 am

Set wrote:Most art thieves wouldn't bother, they're too lazy. That's why they steal art in the first place.

It's sorta like ripping a game, DVD, etc. Only ONE guy has to do it, then everyone else has free access. So, this scenario, one guy spends time getting the pictures, posts them, then they're out and about and eery thief has easy access to 'em. Just as if the gallery had stayed the same.

Plus, there's already the fact that most of the art is already out there.

Morkulv · Post by **Morkulv** » Mon Jul 02, 2007 10:39 pm