http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/a ... ge_id=1811
I hope he gets back to his pack of wolves and nobody catches him again.





In all likelihood, wolves don't have anything resembling a language.Kelpten wrote:Oh, but imagine how much we could learn about wolves from him! He has insight into the pack dynamic that we've only dreamed of before! He could even divulge the language of wolves! But I suppose that in order to obtain this information we'd have to "civilize" him first, and that always ends in tragedy. Perhaps if he was found again and befriened without taking him out of the wilds, and gradually taught human speech we'd be able to extract the information without damaging him. But that sounds horribly inhumane and selfish the way I said it.




Hence why I added on the "At least not the "A is for Apple" kind." after that.RedEye wrote:When you say "In all likelyhood, Wolves don't have anything resembling a language; I tend to disagree.
If you define Language as Words with a meaning-they don't. What they have is the same sort of language we had at that level of our development.
Specific sounds. Postures. Actions. Nothing to write home about, but as a means of communicating, it's an adequate language for them.
They don't need to calculate the value of Pi, or compose "Sonnets from the Portugese"...not quite yet...![]()
But their language is adequate for what they need to communicate between themselves.
Then a normal wolf works fine, no?Kelpten wrote: A native speaker that's capable of teaching you holds many portents.
Hence why some jokes don't cross over human languages. Not all our languages use the same stuff. So one half the audience will be laughing, the other half either didn't know what was said, or translated it in their head and are wondering why it's so funny to those other guys.RedEye wrote:Problem is, for a translation to occur, you have to have similar meanings and similar concepts of those meanings.
The Wolf-Boy doesn't have either- not with Humans.
Then there's the lack of a tail-sort of the equivalent of a hare-lip in a Human; I'd guess. Certain meanings cannot be articulated, because we Humans are "Speech Impaired" as far as Wolves are concerned.![]()


And insofar as that young person is concerned, he IS a wolf, not a "human" as in Homo Sapiet Sapiens (Man who beleves he thinks).Teh_DarkJokerWolf wrote:Leave it to humans to mess with the life of a wolfI hope they never find him. He needs to be with his family poor guy..





Remember kids. Killing is wrong but when they kill its A-ok!WereWolfBoy wrote:then i say we kill all the humans over there.
Yeah lets let loads of people die for the crime of using heat from a country that due to killing some animals (i mean we should kill all countries that hunt right?) ans now apparently deserves to all die. I was hoping this thread would not get on its anti human soapbox but guess i was wrong. I don't like how wolves are hunted either but murder is still wrong even if you think its response to other murder.I say to heck with them (concidering i can't say the ladder) there are other ways to heat homes and cook food, plus no one needs booze.

