http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_state_din ... ted_guests
I'm not sure who deserves to be b****-slapped first: the couple, or the Secret Service guys that didn't notice them.







i don't see what the big deal is really, so two people got by the guest list, they still went through security check, it is rather comical reallyTerastas wrote:There's two things that I'm willing to bet will come out of this:
1) Those two A-holes will get included on Real Housewives (because smart people never watch that crap anyway)
2) Those two A-holes are going to be making more Republican appearances than Carrie Prejean and Joe the Plumber combined.![]()
Just goes to show that all the money in the world can't buy an ounce of class or taste. Seems to be just the opposite actually.

If it wasn't a public function, wouldn't it be fine for the government to charge them with trespassing? It is technically private property, in the sense that it's solely owned by the US government.Uniform Two Six wrote:Actually, it would be tresspassing on U.S. Government (not private) property, but there's a catch: The State Dinner is technically a public function.


What they were worried about is the possibility. If those two had wanted to harm the president, and somehow managed to get weapons past security... You get the idea. It would've ended badly.Lukas wrote: i don't see what the big deal is really, so two people got by the guest list, they still went through security check, it is rather comical really

They can worrya bout the possibilities sure sure fine but I think It's going to be hard for some redneck triple K guy to slip a few handguns past the metal detector.Noir-Okami wrote:What they were worried about is the possibility. If those two had wanted to harm the president, and somehow managed to get weapons past security... You get the idea. It would've ended badly.Lukas wrote: i don't see what the big deal is really, so two people got by the guest list, they still went through security check, it is rather comical really
And it makes some sense why they'd be paranoid. The Telegraph reported that Obama gets about 30 death threats a day. This is apparently up 400% from Bush Jr's term.

It's not the checkpoints that are the problem. Sure, they made it inside without any weapons, but whose to say they couldn't have just swiped a fork or knife off the table (it was a dinner event) and stabbed him with it when they went up to meet him?Lukas wrote:They can worrya bout the possibilities sure sure fine but I think It's going to be hard for some redneck triple K guy to slip a few handguns past the metal detector.


fair enough I'm not saying don't give a slap on the wrist. but they don't need to fire anyone over it as far as Secret service goes. it was Obama's first major dinner party for a foreign government and mistakes happen. But I don't like paranoid attitudes over incidents like this that is all. Also its hard to kill someone with a dinner fork or a knife, takes a lot of effort! ;p. but sometimes the best reaction is a good laugh and a quiet change in the security.Terastas wrote:It's not the checkpoints that are the problem. Sure, they made it inside without any weapons, but whose to say they couldn't have just swiped a fork or knife off the table (it was a dinner event) and stabbed him with it when they went up to meet him?Lukas wrote:They can worrya bout the possibilities sure sure fine but I think It's going to be hard for some redneck triple K guy to slip a few handguns past the metal detector.
Regardless of the intent, they still deliberately conducted a breach of security, trespassed on government property and lied to federal officers to fake their entry. Giving them a free pass on this now will essentially be an invitation for others to make similar attempts. And if all it takes to get into the White House is to show up, it will only be a matter of time before somebody uses such an event as an opportunity to murder him.

No it was a public function, technically (closed to the general public, to be sure) but if people who do not have standing authority to demand entry to the White House (like the Indian dignitaries), are given blanket authorization to enter, then legally it is a public function. That's why they can't be charged with a crime (although Terastas brought up an interesting point that I had not thought of: If they told a Secret Service guard that they were on the guest list, then they could conceivably go down for lying to a law enforcement official -- although that's probably a very minor misdemeanor).Gevaudan wrote: If it wasn't a public function, wouldn't it be fine for the government to charge them with trespassing? It is technically private property, in the sense that it's solely owned by the US government.

Well, I know it was a public function. I was just being hypothetical.Uniform Two Six wrote:No it was a public function, technically (closed to the general public, to be sure) but if people who do not have standing authority to demand entry to the White House (like the Indian dignitaries), are given blanket authorization to enter, then legally it is a public function. That's why they can't be charged with a crime (although Terastas brought up an interesting point that I had not thought of: If they told a Secret Service guard that they were on the guest list, then they could conceivably go down for lying to a law enforcement official -- although that's probably a very minor misdemeanor).
And tresspassing on U.S. Government property is a federal charge, whereas tresspassing on private property is a local one. Big difference, actually.



