What werewolves should NOT look like.

Jamie · Post by **Jamie** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:27 pm

Bad looking werewolves....Howling. They look like bunnies! Werebunnys. Long ears, severely bucked teeth. Or maybe....Kangaroos, that's it. Longs legs and funny looking eyes. Yeah....Yeah.

Someday, someone needs to make a parody of the "Howling" movies. Have the werewolves look exactly the same, but have them not be werewolves. Have them be kangaroos. Call the movie "Attack of the Werekangaroos" and have the monsters bouncing all over people's lawns, destroying the grass so badly that a crack team of werekangaroo hunters must be called in. Otherwise, the lawns are doomed.

Set · Post by **Set** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 12:37 pm

The parody with the roos could be called The Hopping. Everyone hide your lawn gnomes.

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:10 pm

Doruk Golcu wrote:
Figarou wrote:
CNash wrote: 5.) If you're on a shoestring, Dog Soldiers-style "collapse under the table and reappear with fangs" TFs are acceptable, but barely. Try for Ginger Snaps-style TF flashcuts where possible.

I hated that scene in Dog Soldiers!!!

"collapse under the table and reappear with fangs"

Throw that one OUT!!
They had a lot of budgetary concerns...

I hope that doesn't happen with Freeborn. I hate to see a lot of money spent on one scene only to have it taken out of the film later on.

WereDog · Post by **WereDog** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:11 pm

Someday, someone needs to make a parody of the "Howling" movies. Have the werewolves look exactly the same, but have them not be werewolves. Have them be kangaroos.

that would be "howling 3: the marsupials"

Jamie · Post by **Jamie** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 1:20 pm

that would be "howling 3: the marsupials"

That would be one of the movies it was parodying. Also, "Howling 3" was not a parody, but a serious movie, and it was one of the better "Howling" sequels (which isn't saying much, considering the competition).

ABrownrigg · Post by **ABrownrigg** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 2:08 pm

I have indeed visited transfur, as well as talked to many transformational artists. Arania and LoboLeo for two who are very talented in my opinion. I also have been looking at other artists like Gryf. Amazing things, and im particularly facinatted with Gryf, he has to have some anatomy study somewhere in him. His atttention to detail is wonderful.

A Brownrigg

CNash · Post by **CNash** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:40 pm

LoboLeo is one of the best in the business, hands down, and Arania's not bad either - though lately there has been some criticism of her work.

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:44 pm

CNash wrote:LoboLeo is one of the best in the business, hands down,

yup yup!! I asked him to draw my character Figarou for me!!

*points to avatar*

WereDog · Post by **WereDog** » Wed Jul 20, 2005 6:06 pm

Jamie wrote:
that would be "howling 3: the marsupials"
That would be one of the movies it was parodying. Also, "Howling 3" was not a parody, but a serious movie, and it was one of the better "Howling" sequels (which isn't saying much, considering the competition).

serious?... nope. altho it wasnt a parody.

i have to agree, it was a great sequeal(unlike that crappy part 6)

Darum · Post by **Darum** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 2:00 am

.http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b228/ ... e_1024.jpg

they should look something like this.... only, with a tail...

hydrocarbon · Post by **hydrocarbon** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:29 am

Jamie wrote:Someday, someone needs to make a parody of the "Howling" movies. Have the werewolves look exactly the same, but have them not be werewolves. Have them be kangaroos. Call the movie "Attack of the Werekangaroos" and have the monsters bouncing all over people's lawns, destroying the grass so badly that a crack team of werekangaroo hunters must be called in. Otherwise, the lawns are doomed.

Kangarou?

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 3:34 am

iolarnula wrote: Kangarou?

No.

Hang-a-roo

http://www.primarygames.com/langarts/hangaroo

WereDog · Post by **WereDog** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:10 am

Darum wrote:big picture
they should look something like this.... only, with a tail....

yes, but with less clothes

Darum · Post by **Darum** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:37 am

WereDog wrote:
yes, but with less clothes

that's why i said *something like* lol... but if we're going to go into more detail i might as well say "also, with-out the axe"...

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 4:42 am

Darum wrote:
WereDog wrote:
yes, but with less clothes
that's why i said *something like* lol... but if we're going to go into more detail i might as well say "also, with-out the axe"...

I see you edited your post because I was going to say it needs a tail.

and....

kindar · Post by **kindar** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:56 pm

WereDog wrote:
Darum wrote:big picture
they should look something like this.... only, with a tail....
yes, but with less clothes

why less clothes?

from my point of view a werewolf should wear as much clothing as he fells like wearing. sure he won't need it for protection against the elements, but I still expect a werewolf to have some human traits, like vanity.

that's not to say that clothing should survive the transformation, but he could definitively plan ahead of time.

as has been mentioned before, they aren't monsters.

Darum · Post by **Darum** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:18 pm

kindar wrote:
WereDog wrote:
Darum wrote:big picture
they should look something like this.... only, with a tail....
yes, but with less clothes
why less clothes?

from my point of view a werewolf should wear as much clothing as he fells like wearing. sure he won't need it for protection against the elements, but I still expect a werewolf to have some human traits, like vanity.

that's not to say that clothing should survive the transformation, but he could definitively plan ahead of time.

as has been mentioned before, they aren't monsters.

when they shape shift, they tear theyr clothes...

kindar · Post by **kindar** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:29 pm

Darum wrote:
kindar wrote:
WereDog wrote:
Darum wrote:big picture
they should look something like this.... only, with a tail....
yes, but with less clothes
why less clothes?

from my point of view a werewolf should wear as much clothing as he fells like wearing. sure he won't need it for protection against the elements, but I still expect a werewolf to have some human traits, like vanity.

that's not to say that clothing should survive the transformation, but he could definitively plan ahead of time.

as has been mentioned before, they aren't monsters.
when they shape shift, they tear theyr clothes...

what's to stop one of them from carrying spare clothing of the size he's oin as a werewolf?

Fenrir · Post by **Fenrir** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:30 pm

This is going to become an arguement of matter again isn't it? Because Kindar is going to say he is going to stay the same size and Darum is going to say he's going to become bigger.

Fenrir · Post by **Fenrir** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:30 pm

Or that, I was wrong.

kindar · Post by **kindar** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:32 pm

Fenrir wrote:This is going to become an arguement of matter again isn't it? Because Kindar is going to say he is going to stay the same size and Darum is going to say he's going to become bigger.

<chuckles> Nahh. I know they get bigger when they change, I'm simply going along the lines of them being smart enough to be prepared for it]

and I'll drop this before it becomes an argument. I have nothing to prove, I was simply curious

Lupin · Post by **Lupin** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:34 pm

Fenrir wrote:This is going to become an arguement of matter again isn't it? Because Kindar is going to say he is going to stay the same size and Darum is going to say he's going to become bigger.

Well even if they do get bigger, it's not like clothes come in only one size.

Fenrir · Post by **Fenrir** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:37 pm

Werwolf big and tall shop?

kindar · Post by **kindar** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:39 pm

Fenrir wrote: Werwolf big and tall shop?

well, they have the bakery for the coconut, why not one for clothing <grins>

outwarddoodles · Post by **outwarddoodles** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 6:16 pm

I'm going to say I'm not very fearful apon the budget for effects in Freeborn, being the fact I doubt theres going to be any of those unnecessary explosions. I just don't see two cars bumping each other and then going up in flames in this movie.

Oh, and not to offend any one here. It really hurts my mind when theres a croll at the bottom of my page and I'm trying to read text or see something, and I have my setting on for the monitor where thats usually not a problem. So if the picture seems a little big please resize it or just give us a link. Thankies.