Iran is a "Nuclear duck."

I'm not sure it's even funny.









http://rt.com/news/israel-saudi-iran-nuclear-846/ here is the article.Uniform Two Six wrote:Yeah, but the thing I don't get is this deal might actually prevent Iran from going nuclear. Israel is only risking alienating their biggest geopolitical ally (the U.S.). I hadn't heard about the Saudi-Israeli thing, but I find it somewhat dubious. Yeah, both the Saudis and the Israelis hate the Iranians, and are seriously ticked that the U.S. is going with the carrot over the stick, but they hate each other more than they do the Iranians. If the Saudi's allowed Israeli aircraft to overfly their territory to hit Iran, there would be some serious political turmoil over there. The Saudi public generally views the Israelis as more or less demonic.



RT,CNN,BBC,Al jezeera are all biased more or less.as for: The Saudis hate the Israelis did you ever heard of phrase the enemy of my enemy is my friend?Uniform Two Six wrote:Israel has something of a problem, in that its birds don't have the range to hit Iran un-refueled. Israel is a fairly small country and thus they've never acquired any long-range strike platforms (like F-15E -- theirs are F-15C derivatives), nor do they have any organic tanker aircraft of their own to my knowledge. Even with their conformal FAST tanks, they just don't have the legs to reach that far. According to that article, the Saudis are committing to not only authorizing overflight (in itself, an unimaginably big deal), but also going the extra step of providing their own KC-135 tankers to the mission. I'd like to know what their source is on this (I'm a little biased, perhaps but I take anything Russia Times says with a certain dose of skepticism). Such a move would be absolutely unprecedented. The Saudis hate the Israelis.
Even if there is such a plan in the works, I'm still perplexed by it. They've got more to gain by letting the U.S. pursue the diplomatic route. Those facilities aren't going anywhere. If the Iranians breach the agreement, the strike option is always there and is going to be more robust if the U.S. joins in. I just genuinely don't get the Israeli position in this.


The Iranians represent an exterior military threat. Cooperation with the Israelis represents a very real internal threat (as in a pissed off Saudi civil population). With the "Arab-Spring" still fresh in their minds, I'm having trouble believing that the Saudi royals are looking at the former as the greater threat than the latter.lovec1990 wrote: ...did you ever heard of phrase the enemy of my enemy is my friend?

but there is posibility for them working together.Uniform Two Six wrote:The Iranians represent an exterior military threat. Cooperation with the Israelis represents a very real internal threat (as in a pissed off Saudi civil population). With the "Arab-Spring" still fresh in their minds, I'm having trouble believing that the Saudi royals are looking at the former as the greater threat than the latter.lovec1990 wrote: ...did you ever heard of phrase the enemy of my enemy is my friend?


As I said before, it would be utterly unprecedented. The Israelis and the Saudis never cooperate on anything.lovec1990 wrote: but there is posibility for them working together.
Eh... until Freeborn comes out, there's not much else to talk about.lovec1990 wrote: Offtopic: its funny we are on forum dedicaded to Werewolfs and curently most active topic: politics

ok you winUniform Two Six wrote:As I said before, it would be utterly unprecedented. The Israelis and the Saudis never cooperate on anything.lovec1990 wrote: but there is posibility for them working together.
Eh... until Freeborn comes out, there's not much else to talk about.lovec1990 wrote: Offtopic: its funny we are on forum dedicaded to Werewolfs and curently most active topic: politics



