The main character is named Lou Garou...
Click here. Seriously, you won't believe this thing. Words fail me. Where's Terastas? *grumble, grumble, grumble*...



Heh...I can top that.Uniform Two Six wrote:"...Dirty Harry -- only hairier..."
The main character is named Lou Garou...
![]()


If he is a member of this board, then he would've picked up a lot of good information. Judging from the title, I seriously doubt it.Uniform Two Six wrote:Like, I'm afraid to bad-mouth this thing too much because:
A. I haven't seen it yet.
and
B. The guy who came up with it might actually be on the board.
But seriously? How come Brownrigg is screaming for funding, and this guy gets $1M? Even more perplexing: This was apparently a scripting contest -- and this was the best thing submitted?





And:Terastas wrote: Either their strategy is to produce a movie so cheaply that even people who know it will be bad but can't help themselves anyway (let's face it: horror fans are desensitized to having the genre crapped all over to the point that it's practically expected)...
lovec1990 wrote:well im gona see this film im not gona judge it just by trailer and budget well for WW design if im curently enjoying watching Teen Wolf(2011- ) i will have no problem with this design so i will watch it and then i will decide if its good movie

A corny film title and protagonist name, cooked and buttered up just the same. Nibble it up from one end to the other, bin the waste core and ask for another. When it's all eaten ask what it should be? A low budget feature for mainstream TV.Uniform Two Six wrote:"...Dirty Harry -- only hairier..."
The main character is named Lou Garou...

Warning sign #1: It's a comedy horror. Which, more often than not, translates to "bad horror." Unless it's a horror spoof like Scary Movie, a psychological comedy-horror like Red Victoria or a completely over-the-top concept like Sharknado, comedy and horror do not mix outside of Rifftrax.lovec1990 wrote:sorry but i dont quite get it what do you have against this movie.

And on that I absolutely agree. Some of my favorite movies were sort of stinkers. Case in point: Tremors and Big Trouble in Little China. Loved both and they were what a friend of mine once termed "delightfully crappy". I just don't see Wolf Cop ever quite reaching "delightful". I'm having trouble imagining it getting much beyond the "crappy" part.Terastas wrote: And look, it's okay if you're a sucker for bad movies. . .












ACK! ACK!lovec1990 wrote:Uniform i did enjoy mars attack

Uniform Two Six wrote:ACK! ACK!lovec1990 wrote:Uniform i did enjoy mars attack



I spotted this on DVD at my local supermarket today....*Grins*. No I didn't get it, but I might. Should I get it and write a review?Uniform Two Six wrote:Apparently it just recently came out. As much as I hate to admit it, this thing may not be as bad as I think we all assumed at first. It uses practical effects instead of CGI, and several reviewers (including Rotten Tomatoes) felt it was actually okay. I'm still having issues actually believing that -- it just sounds too corny (including it's new tag-line "Here comes the fuzz"). I think I'll wait to see it on Netflix.
