Breasts get in the way. And if they're big and they bounce, they *HURT!*
'Course I got lucky...my sister got the "tits" gene, I got the "hips" gene


Heh, as far as tits and hips gene...I got both.vrikasatma wrote:Ya think so?![]()
Breasts get in the way. And if they're big and they bounce, they *HURT!*![]()
'Course I got lucky...my sister got the "tits" gene, I got the "hips" gene


Allen wrote:Me too.Excelsia wrote:Heh, as far as tits and hips gene...I got both.vrikasatma wrote:Ya think so?![]()
Breasts get in the way. And if they're big and they bounce, they *HURT!*![]()
'Course I got lucky...my sister got the "tits" gene, I got the "hips" gene![]()


Eheheh... too soon to tell. Though the last quote amused me very much.Excelsia wrote:Allen wrote:Me too.Excelsia wrote:Heh, as far as tits and hips gene...I got both.vrikasatma wrote:Ya think so?![]()
Breasts get in the way. And if they're big and they bounce, they *HURT!*![]()
'Course I got lucky...my sister got the "tits" gene, I got the "hips" gene![]()
It'd be kinda nice if they were detachable..."Hmmm...I don't feel like wearing my breasts today."
I concur.Figarou wrote:wow!! this booby thread has gone out of control!!
Men breast feeding?
OUCH!!!!
GOT MILK?

Two kids playing hide and seek. The daughter decides to hide in thier parents room.Excelsia wrote:
It'd be kinda nice if they were detachable..."Hmmm...I don't feel like wearing my breasts today."
In the old days, this was called "witch milk" and could get the man killed by superstitious neighbors. It also showed up in children sometimes, especially newborn babies, perhaps because of them getting exposed to their mother's pregnancy hormones. It has always been quite rare.A man can not produce milk, even if he's given lots and lots of estrogen, ever. Male mammals have nipples, in that the default sex of mammals is female. A male can grow large breasts, and can develop breast cancer as a result of estrogen therapy, but no milk.
Ever.

Ah see.., now there is an assuption that sounds very blankety. ;)Scott Gardener wrote:I've noticed that women in general tend to favor smaller breasts, whereas guys tend to favor larger ones on women. I voted for smaller, myself, because, if women are the ones with them, and if they're shifting form, they're going to aim for what they want--and that appears to be getting them out of the way.



<-- Don't Do Crack (character from South Park)
Agreed. IMO, there are plenty more ways than breasts to make a female werewolf look feminine, and I would prefer those ways be utilized first. Breasts, IMO, should be a last resort.Vuldari wrote: If Tim Albee could come up with a way to make the female werewolves look unmistakably feminine, without having any visable breasts in Gestalt form, I would prefer that option.
You hit the nail on the head, buddy. Breasts, most definitely, do get in the way, probably even more so for the kind of things a werewolf might be doing.Scott Gardener wrote:I've noticed that women in general tend to favor smaller breasts, whereas guys tend to favor larger ones on women. I voted for smaller, myself, because, if women are the ones with them, and if they're shifting form, they're going to aim for what they want--and that appears to be getting them out of the way.


This is what I mean!outwarddoodles wrote:There is a picture Goldie did titled 'Yin-Yang' that has a male and a female wolf. What I like about this picture is you can easily distingush which is which.
http://www.goldenwolfen.com/archive/200 ... inyang.jpg
C-cup breasts that didn't bounce would look fake tooMorkulv wrote:Breasts should be as large as in human form, fur-covered and non-bouncy.
They don't have to disappear, that would make it look fake, IMO.
<-- Don't Do Crack (character from South Park)