Werewolf Genitalia

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:41 am

Excelsia wrote:
Shadow Wulf wrote:thats sounds boobylicouse

We need a wolfie emoticon for rolling eyes in a joking, happy way.

Hmmmmmmmm........ Lets see what I can do with this.

But I'll work on it later. I'm tired. Working overtime is the pits.

Celestialwolf · Post by **Celestialwolf** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 5:49 am

ChaosWolf wrote:Personally, the way werewolves are in my own perceptions, the genitals of the male are mixed, with the canine sheath and knot, but the placement of it between the legs human-style instead of riding up the belly like a dog (look at any anthro-wolf nude to understand this)

As for the female, it too is mixed, but, unlike the male, which favors the canine side over the human one, the female is the reverse, favoring the human over the canine - the overal form is a human one, but the clitoris is a bit larger, and the labia are a bit thicker and 'puffy', in resemblance to the canine females 'protruding' genitals.

All of this, mind you, is somewhat easily concealed by the moderately-thick layer of fur masking the outline of such things, which, unaroused, only makes the males have a slight bulge, and the females a smooth groin

I've been trying to avoid this thread for a while now *Cough Cough* but I also have to agree with ChaosWolf. This way, hopefully the rating will be PG-13?

On an "anatomically correct" point, though-if males had sheaths, wouldn't they have to, you know, do the wild thing- from behind the female?

I don't know if that's already been discussed.

Figarou wrote:But I'll work on it later. I'm tired. Working overtime is the pits.

I agree with 'ya, man. I have to work until 2:30 am 4 days a week! Blah.

mielikkishunt · Post by **mielikkishunt** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:15 am

Excelsia wrote:
SnowWalker wrote: I know how you feel with the animal genitalia thing. I'm a dog breeder, and I've had to 'aid' the mothers with their births on more than one occasion. More like do it for them. Bleh.

Ah, the bliss of having a breed who's pretty much natural . .out of 5 litters, have only had to help one dog.. they clean up after themselves. . i just hate the leaking afterwards.

Renorei · Post by **Renorei** » Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:57 am

mielikkishunt wrote: Ah, the bliss of having a breed who's pretty much natural . .out of 5 litters, have only had to help one dog.. they clean up after themselves. . i just hate the leaking afterwards.

My dogs usually don't need help, but sometimes they do. Then again, we've had over a hundred litters, so I guess a few problems here and there are to be expected.

I hate when the baby comes out feet first. There's not much I can do, except pull it out quickly (and carefully), get the sac off it, and hope it lives. I'm proud to say that more than a few puppies that we've delivered this way have turned out fine.

Dog breeding is truly rewarding.

Zire · Post by **Zire** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:07 pm

mm its a little bit hard topic but
i think that in the males is like 90 % canine and 10% human
and in the females is more like human (im not sure but i think that tere is not much diference in the females just the ubication)
i think that in females is more human but more lower

(sorry for my bad spellig ill try to improve)

Shadow Wulf · Post by **Shadow Wulf** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:40 pm

I personaly think(just thinking outloud) that werewolfs should mantian 20% or more of human features.

NightStorm · Post by **NightStorm** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:03 pm

Here here
I agree Choas. I like that idea, but I'm staying out of this topic....it's too weird.

white · Post by **white** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:06 pm

We've been all over the properties of the gestalt form for the most part; let's keep this on topic.
Anyway, I'd expect the changes to be basically the same for both male and female; thus, both sex's genitalia would be modified to the same extent. However, take note that any mating could be easily done in either human or full wolf form, so it's not too much of a worry in that way. Sacrifices must always be made for the sake of aesthetics in movies, but I really don't think that this is too relevant to Freeborn, at least; it's not (I hope) the sort of movie where we'd see much relevant to that sort of thing. Even if a werewolf in gestalt form goes unclothed, chances are there'd be enough fur down there to make details such as this irrelevant for the most part. However, I can't say I'm much experienced with female canines, and the differences might be more pronounced than I'm aware of, but I'd be surprised if it was really that important, what with the gestalt's fur all over the place.

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:17 pm

NightStorm wrote:Here here
I agree Choas. I like that idea, but I'm staying out of this topic....it's too weird.

Yes, it is wierd. And I don't think its going to be mentioned in the film as well.

Lets just cover up that part with fur and not worry on how its suppose to look like.

*beans Excelsia with duckies for starting this topic*

white · Post by **white** » Thu Oct 06, 2005 10:02 pm

Heh. We seem to have a consensus on this.

Silverclaw · Post by **Silverclaw** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 3:32 pm

I like ChaosWolf's thoughts the most as well.

I shall deem ChaosWolf, 'Werewolf Genitalia Expert'

Akela · Post by **Akela** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 5:51 pm

This topic is getting a little too weird for me... I've learned far too much.

Gods, I've learned more about body parts from this forum than my Anatomy Class.

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:18 pm

Akela wrote:This topic is getting a little too weird for me... I've learned far too much.

Gods, I've learned more about body parts from this forum than my Anatomy Class.

Well, when it comes to show and tell, you'll have something to talk about.

Kzinistzerg · Post by **Kzinistzerg** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 6:24 pm

SHOWand tell? Ew,, I don't want to tink about that. *shudders*

Akela · Post by **Akela** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:12 pm

Figarou wrote:
Akela wrote:This topic is getting a little too weird for me... I've learned far too much.

Gods, I've learned more about body parts from this forum than my Anatomy Class.

Well, when it comes to show and tell, you'll have something to talk about.

Hmm... I know I have a dismembered arm around here somewhere

Veruth · Post by **Veruth** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:48 pm

Silverclaw wrote:I like ChaosWolf's thoughts the most as well.

I shall deem ChaosWolf, 'Werewolf Genitalia Expert'

What about Excelsia? I'd say she knows her stuff pretty well too

to Excelsia: As long as I'm talking about you I'd like to say your avatar is awesome.

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 8:53 pm

Shaun wrote:
Silverclaw wrote:I like ChaosWolf's thoughts the most as well.

I shall deem ChaosWolf, 'Werewolf Genitalia Expert'

What about Excelsia? I'd say she knows her stuff pretty well too

Well, of course. She is a dog breeder.

Veruth · Post by **Veruth** » Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:11 pm

That is true, that would explain both her knowledge and the avatar and the text above it.

Lupin · Post by **Lupin** » Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:22 am

Akela wrote: Hmm... I know I have a dismembered arm around here somewhere

Well, you'll find it when it starts to smell.

ChaosWolf · Post by **ChaosWolf** » Sun Oct 09, 2005 8:08 pm

Silverclaw wrote:I like ChaosWolf's thoughts the most as well.

I shall deem ChaosWolf, 'Werewolf Genitalia Expert'

I have no idea how to respond to that...

Shadow Wulf · Post by **Shadow Wulf** » Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:12 pm

Just say ok.

Lupin · Post by **Lupin** » Sun Oct 09, 2005 9:34 pm

Heh, I can just see that as your custom title now..

Figarou · Post by **Figarou** » Mon Oct 10, 2005 1:41 am

ChaosWolf wrote:
Silverclaw wrote:I like ChaosWolf's thoughts the most as well.

I shall deem ChaosWolf, 'Werewolf Genitalia Expert'

I have no idea how to respond to that...

Got yourself into a little dilemma, haven't you?

Koshaw · Post by **Koshaw** » Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:11 am

hehehehehe ^^'

Silverclaw · Post by **Silverclaw** » Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:24 pm

MWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!