). Anyways, one member is always bringing new members in, who are always younger. Some of us get kinda irked with it, but we put up with it. Despite we're always getting new members, they never stay permanently and so the four of us are the original and the core I guess you'd say. The reason I don't say we're outcasts is because even though some kids say stuff to me, I'm not ostrasized (sp?) nor was anyone else. We did it to ourselves I guess, but we don't shun people and well, if newer, younger members are always brought in I suppose that means we're not anti-social either. I think that werewolves would tend to seek out like-minded werewolves, you know? The jocks would hang with other jocks and because of the comptetive nature, they might have a ranking order, but they'd all be pretty friendly with each other. No rank squabbles or anything, unless someone got upset (like "I play football 10 times better than you! I'm better! I should be more important!" or something like that). It'd probably just be a little more tense than the "outcasts" and such.I think some canine traits would show up in human behavior (I typed "behaviour" and I'm not Canadian, Australian, or British. I don't even live near them and I type like them without meaning too, lol). I believe that whether you showed the front of your neck or the back would depend on how you were raised, you know, manners and the like. Or might boil down to personal preference or the people you hang with. Very interesting thought though
I think the same would prove true for wolf form. Just how you were raised and other factors coming into play.As for pack structures, I think it would depend on the pack. City packs might have tighter structures if the pack members lived in areas where you needed to look out for each other and have a leader to lead. I think of my town as rural and the only sort of tight structure I can really see (school kid wise, but not in a school setting) would be the rednecks getting together to hunt. That might cause some squabbles with rank ("No, my way's better! If we go around and sneak up"). Squabbles wouldn't arise in groups that went out to chill and have fun, just where something mattered, like bagging a deer or whatever. So, I think the city packs would be more rigid because if the members live in the "bad side of town", they'd have to look out for one another and someone would rise as a leader because they are more qualified.
The view toward would probably vary. Some groups would take them in, like how some groups at schools just adopt the new kid, others would completely ignore them or harass them. I view it like high school because I find it amazing how cruel the kids in my school can be to one another and that for some reason, high school kids are just rowdy
If someone was part of an elite pack and went with someone from a "lower" pack, the members of the elite would probably be pretty pissed, and maybe even the members of the other pack would feel the same way. If those two left, the remaining members of both packs would probably hold a grudge. The packs might split with the loss of leaders, or someone might take their place and the pack would stay together.A lot of my views, now that I really think about them, seem to be high school situations, but being a teen I guess that's natural
I guess some of the scenarios might hold true for non-school situations. Heh, maybe my opinion will change once I'm out of highschool and finish college 
<-- Don't Do Crack (character from South Park)
), but I didn't fit into the clique as a whole. I was allowed to come and go, sit on the fringes or in the center. It was a comfortabel place to be, and my only fond memories of people in my age group are from those times.
<--- THEY PWN U