www.crescentwolf.freewebspace.com
check it out


I agree that if there was a reasonable number of werewolves in the world, a few of them, (or humans that help werewolves & protect secret) would have to be in emergency room and proabably one up in the administration so to be able to authorize certain desisions that might otherwise be questionable. If a bitten follow came in, and it was recognised quickly, probably be arranged to send bitten human to a specialist at a 'Clinic' to check the person outScott Gardener wrote:One of the major problems I had early on with my story was explaining why my character, being generally of sound mind and intelligence, didn't go to the ER when he started running a fever and having a strange vascular rash around an animal bite. It was especially a problem given that he was just accepted to medical school. I couldn't just say that he was a do-it-yourselfer.
If there are a reasonable number of werewolves in the world, at least a few would need to have ties with hospital emergency rooms.
Oops, I've said too much.





Once a T-cell has encountered a foreign object, it becomes 'activated' and multiplying rapidly. It's not so much that a the body has a spare reserve of T-cells somewhere, and releases them as needed. I just don't think that the virus would be able to multiply that greatly without activating an immune response.Moon Daughter wrote:And as the infection may grow, the more white blood cells are released to courteract the virus. In this instance, the majoirty of the white blood cells that were active before the werewolf virus went dormant would disappate in the virus's seeming absence. But when the virus resurfaces in a greater magnitude, the body will be completely unprepared for something such as that. There will not be nearly enough white blood cells at that current time to in any way counteract the virus.

You'd be surprised how greatly a virus can replicate without attracting any immunodefensive responses. A virus replicates by injecting it's own genetic material into a cell. This material will assemble into several more copies of the original virus, with I believe the amount of viruses created depending on the size of the infected cell (basically it can hold just about as many actual virus cells as the normal cell itself). The majority of normal viruses at this point will simply burst through the cell membrane (the outer boundry of the cell) and pour into the blood stream, with this process being continuous.I just don't think that the virus would be able to multiply that greatly without activating an immune response.
No, your body does't have a spare reserve of T-cells anywhere. It does, though, have a specific amount of T-cells that are always present. As you said, once it encounters a foreign object, it becomes 'activated' and multiplies rapidly. After a virus has been (or has seemingly been) eradicated, T-cell levels will return to normal, as they were before the virus was there. This is what causes people to seemingly get better from a virus, and then all of a sudden be a lot worse. It's not that common for viruses to follow this dormant stage trend, but certain rare (maybe not rare, but not that common) viruses will follow it.Once a T-cell has encountered a foreign object, it becomes 'activated' and multiplying rapidly. It's not so much that a the body has a spare reserve of T-cells somewhere, and releases them as needed.

Well, the body's T-cell's response is pretty complete. I read somewhere haven't found a foreign protien that doesn't cause an immune response yet.Ralith wrote:Sorry if this has already been answered, but what if the virus isn't recognized by existing T-cells? Can the body still identify it as a hostile foreign body?
Actually they replicate by injecting their genetic material into the cell and hijacking the machinery to make more viruses. The thing is, in addition to detecting foreign materials, the immune system also is charged with detecitng normal cells that are functioning abnormally. So if these cells are acting abnormal then the immune system is also going to respond to that.Moon Daughter wrote:You'd be surprised how greatly a virus can replicate without attracting any immunodefensive responses. A virus replicates by injecting it's own genetic material into a cell. This material will assemble into several more copies of the original virus, with I believe the amount of viruses created depending on the size of the infected cell (basically it can hold just about as many actual virus cells as the normal cell itself).

I'm not too sure how it works specifically, I'll have to consult a couple of resourses. This is definately an interesting topic though. I do believe that the cells can function normally even when they are infected with the viral material. I know the cytoplasm (the inside of a cell) is quite large and empty despite the organlles (structures that help the cell function) inside it. Like I said before, I'll have to do some extra research on it. It may take me a while though, cause the book I plan to consult is currently locked inside my school (it's winter break) and well as some of my teachers who might know more about this. I'll see if I can use my Anatomy & Physiology in any way, but it might be a bit too general.The hospital where my mom works may have a couple of documents I could use (I'll look in both the pathological section and the immunodefensive section of the library) but it'll take me a while. Things are a little hectic at my house because of the holidays, so my time is scarse. But I do plan to get back to you on that.Lupin wrote:Actually they replicate by injecting their genetic material into the cell and hijacking the machinery to make more viruses. The thing is, in addition to detecting foreign materials, the immune system also is charged with detecitng normal cells that are functioning abnormally. So if these cells are acting abnormal then the immune system is also going to respond to that.
But is that because there's a ton of different T cells, or because the system's adaptive?Lupin wrote:Well, the body's T-cell's response is pretty complete. I read somewhere haven't found a foreign protien that doesn't cause an immune response yet.Ralith wrote:Sorry if this has already been answered, but what if the virus isn't recognized by existing T-cells? Can the body still identify it as a hostile foreign body?

Silver wrote:First off let me say that the whole thing about the moon has already been discussed. The consensus was that the moon affects humans now — we know this from crime and hospital statistics. It affects WWs more strongly. In the beginning the moon’s influence is more powerful. And we also decided that if a human got bitten on a full moon they would change. This may not be what every single person likes, but it IS the consensus as I remember.
I hate to bring it up since everyone is so happy with the drawn out symptoms of an infection — but I think it needs to be looked at. If we have this weeks long infection with these frightening and bizarre symptoms, how is it that WWs have stayed hidden? Wouldn’t people run desperately to their doctors, who would immediately take them to the nearest clinic for exhaustive study — X-rays, blood tests, etc? I would find it hard to believe that with centuries of people having painful, frightening symptoms, that it would remain a secret. People are people and they make mistakes. Centuries mean many mistakes. And a virus that weird and long lasting — how could it stay hidden?
So based on that, I have to vote for a virus that would not make the “victim’ suspicious or nervous until that One Fateful Night. They could things that would make them think they had the flu or something — that would only make them stay at home and their strange behavior would not be noticed by their co-workers.
Feedback?
I would like to see what you think before I put a consensus in Silver's Corner.

Actually there isn't any strong correlation between the full moon and a change in behavior. Most of the studies I have looked at show that there isn't anything special about the full moon. And there was one study that said that the highest number of emergency calls (in this case, to a posion control center) was actually during the new moon.Silver wrote:First off let me say that the whole thing about the moon has already been discussed. The consensus was that the moon affects humans now — we know this from crime and hospital statistics.

Hmmmm.... That "full moon" and behavior change isn't what its cracked up to be.Lupin wrote:Actually there isn't any strong correlation between the full moon and a change in behavior. Most of the studies I have looked at show that there isn't anything special about the full moon. And there was one study that said that the highest number of emergency calls (in this case, to a posion control center) was actually during the new moon.Silver wrote:First off let me say that the whole thing about the moon has already been discussed. The consensus was that the moon affects humans now — we know this from crime and hospital statistics.
What it is is that tend to have a selective memory. They remember strange events on a full moon, but forget when these events happen on other days.

I'm not sure about all that "crime-rate" stuff and everything, but I certainly know that people in my neck of the woods start acting funny during a few moon. Maybe it's because latins always act a little weird, but all I know is that they're all down right bitchy on the full moon...and no the majority of the women aren't PSMing.Figarou wrote:Hmmmm.... That "full moon" and behavior change isn't what its cracked up to be.

