(not a PS2 but close enough)Part 2 was great but lacked a followable story and part 1 was a pure speed shooter, all very good indeed ^^


I Love the TimeSplitters Games, (well...the second two. I've never played the first).Prowler wrote:Part 3 is very good, i like its flawless gameplay. It over heated my PS2 so many times lol(not a PS2 but close enough)
Part 2 was great but lacked a followable story and part 1 was a pure speed shooter, all very good indeed ^^

Only n00bs use the word n00b.Akela wrote:Of course it won't be a Halo killer(I wish) Halo is made for n00bs and n00bs outnumber gamers by quite a lot.Aki wrote:Looks kinda fun, but I don't think it'll be a "halo killer" as you put it. I mean, Halo actually has a story (as does Half Life 2) which puts a perpuse behind all the mindlessly fun killing stuff. This looks little ore than the killing andf stuff, which while fun, gets repetative fast (Which I learned from Halo's flood levels.)
I mean, with sentient alien enemies you can get nice twists to the storyline. Mindless bugs? Er...doubtful...
But it looks amusing enough...
Comparitively, the Halo 1 was harder than two. I found the health-bar in 1 was often the death of me, as the sheilds were slower than snails at recharging. Whereas in Halo 2 the health bar is done away with and the sheild recharge rather quickly..that will be just as hard as halo2 on legendary.




















If I wanted epic battles I'd play Warhammer. =Danarchy wrote:my friend have it, i played, he beated it.
in a mission, there is a specific battle where you get to beat 50 of these annoying creatures ALONE!!!
it dont look like halo at all
but still that game far behind call of duty II

