Emoticons Patented? O-o

The place for anything at all...
Post Reply
Koshaw
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 605
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:04 am
Custom Title: The Duckinator
Location: California, USA

Emoticons Patented? O-o

Post by Koshaw »

ImageImage
User avatar
Aki
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:06 pm
Custom Title: Wolfblood
Gender: Male
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Aki »

Yeah...thats a little insane.

WTH is with laws and the internet nowadays? First thjat annoyance law - now this?

:roll:
Image
User avatar
Morkulv
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 3185
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 10:31 am
Custom Title: Panzer Division Morkulv
Gender: Male
Mood: RAR!
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Morkulv »

Haha, funny.
Scott Gardener wrote: I'd be afraid to shift if I were to lose control. If I just looked fuggly, I'd simply be annoyed every full moon.
Figarou
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 13085
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 5:27 am
Custom Title: Executive Producer (Red Victoria)
Gender: Male
Location: Tejas

Post by Figarou »

Heh...shall I patent the edits I did? :crazy:

:jester:
User avatar
Lupin
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 6129
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:26 pm
Custom Title: Ninja BOFH
Gender: Male
Location: 29°30.727'N 98°35.949'W
Contact:

Post by Lupin »

Eh, the patent hasn't been granted yet.
I don't suffer from lycanthropy, I enjoy every minute of it! Image
User avatar
Scott Gardener
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 4731
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:36 pm
Gender: Male
Mood: Excited
Location: Rockwall, Texas (and beyond infinity)
Contact:

Post by Scott Gardener »

Can Cingular do that? Didn't emoticons emerge from Internet culture? Shoudn't Al Gore have the patent rights?

:supermad:
Taking a Gestalt approach, since it's the "in" thing...
User avatar
white
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 906
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 3:59 pm
Custom Title: Post-Humanist

Post by white »

They can do it. They shouldn't be able to, but they can. It almost certainly won't hold up in court if they actually challenge anyone with it, though.
Sanity is relative.
User avatar
Vilkacis
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:08 pm
Location: Washington

Post by Vilkacis »

Before you all jump to conclusions, don't you think you ought to read the actual patent (US 2006-0015812 A1)?

It says nothing about patenting emoticons.



"Believe none of what you hear... and only half of what you see."

-- Vilkacis
User avatar
Anubis
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 6429
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 7:57 pm
Custom Title: Eletist Jerk
Gender: Male
Location: Crossroads, ganking a hordie lowbie.
Contact:

Post by Anubis »

its freaken stupid!! the emoticon was invented by thousands of people on-line!! its like pantenting music, art, science, mom, and apple pie!! its just as bad when smukers panteted the BP&J!! things that as a culture invented should not be be owned by one person or a greedy copration!!

:x F**K YOU BIG BUSINESS!!! :x
THE GAME

My Armory
Set
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:34 pm
Custom Title: Devil in disguise
Gender: Male

Post by Set »

...Oh for Ra's sake...

Is it any wonder I think people are idiots? :roll:

And Vilkacis, that patent thing doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me. Translation please?
User avatar
Scott Gardener
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 4731
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:36 pm
Gender: Male
Mood: Excited
Location: Rockwall, Texas (and beyond infinity)
Contact:

Post by Scott Gardener »

If I file a patent on stupidity, can I sue half the planet?
Taking a Gestalt approach, since it's the "in" thing...
Set
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:34 pm
Custom Title: Devil in disguise
Gender: Male

Post by Set »

Only half? You underestimate them.
User avatar
Lupin
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 6129
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 11:26 pm
Custom Title: Ninja BOFH
Gender: Male
Location: 29°30.727'N 98°35.949'W
Contact:

Post by Lupin »

Vilkacis wrote:Before you all jump to conclusions, don't you think you ought to read the actual patent (US 2006-0015812 A1)?

It says nothing about patenting emoticons.
Actually if you look at several of the claims, one could misinterpet the patent as Cingular trying to patent the display of emoticons on electronic devices (IANAPL):
United States Patent Application: 0060015812 wrote:3. At an electronic device, a method for generating a displayable icon that indicates the mood or emotion of a user of the electronic device, the method comprising: providing a single-stroke keypad option that is to be selected to generate the displayable icon that indicates the mood or emotion, wherein the single-stroke keypad option includes a key having the displayable icon depicted thereon; and in response to the single-stroke keypad option being selected, generating the displayable icon for display on a display component of the electronic device, wherein the displayable icon is displayed in association with a message to be sent using the electronic device.
United States Patent Application: 0060015812 wrote:6. The method of claim 3 wherein the displayable icon is a textual character.
I don't suffer from lycanthropy, I enjoy every minute of it! Image
User avatar
Scott Gardener
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 4731
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 11:36 pm
Gender: Male
Mood: Excited
Location: Rockwall, Texas (and beyond infinity)
Contact:

CTRL Freaks

Post by Scott Gardener »

This could put patent infringement liability towards anyone who designs any program with a single-key shortcut to posting smileys. So, CTRL-ALT-XD could be out.
Taking a Gestalt approach, since it's the "in" thing...
User avatar
Vilkacis
Legendary
Legendary
Posts: 1974
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 10:08 pm
Location: Washington

Post by Vilkacis »

Set wrote:And Vilkacis, that patent thing doesn't make a damn bit of sense to me. Translation please?
In a sentence, they're patenting a way to input emoticons, not emoticons themselves.

To use what Lupin quoted as an example, all it's describing is this:

1. A keypad that has buttons with emoticons on them.
2. Press a button and it will insert the corresponding emoticon into your message.
3. The emoticon may be graphical or textual.

-- Vilkacis
Post Reply