This is the place for discussion and voting on various aspects of werewolf life, social ideas, physical appearance, etc. Also a place to vote on how a werewolf should look.
Lupin wrote:Agreed, personally it seems appropriate for a universe with magic than one with a more biologicaly grounded one.
Meh...I prefer Van Helsing and Cursed FAR more than this guy. While he's not the worst werewolf ever, he certainly doesn't beat those two, at least not in my book.
The Van Helsing one was very good (probably the best) but the one in Cursed seemd too shaggy to me.
I haven't seen Cursed, I've only seen pictures of the werewolf. So, I can't really say for sure. But, the overall design, despite being far from perfect, still seems to be better than most movie werewolves (which isn't saying much, but meh).
And you're right. Van Helsing was probably the best movie werewolf by far. His only faults were the lack of tail, and the way he moved.
The movement is really just a matter of oppinion I thought it moved fine, and the constant mention of lack of tail really makes everyone here seem really really picky.
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. - Thomas Jefferson
Shadow Wulf wrote:The movement is really just a matter of oppinion I thought it moved fine, and the constant mention of lack of tail really makes everyone here seem really really picky.
I'm not really upset about the fact that he didn't have a tail...I was just pointing out that those were the only two things keeping him from being my ideal werewolf.
Shadow Wulf wrote:The movement is really just a matter of oppinion I thought it moved fine, and the constant mention of lack of tail really makes everyone here seem really really picky.
I'm not really upset about the fact that he didn't have a tail...I was just pointing out that those were the only two things keeping him from being my ideal werewolf.
But do you guys have to bring up the tail part everytime someone mentions Van Helsing Werewolf, you that all the time Renorei, and not just you but others have to.
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. - Thomas Jefferson
Shadow Wulf wrote:But do you guys have to bring up the tail part everytime someone mentions Van Helsing Werewolf, you that all the time Renorei, and not just you but others have to.
YES ...weHave To!...
jk-
I think it is because, of all of the movie werewolves that have ever been seen, the VH werewolf looked the most like the actual animal (at least the head) and therefore seemed the most natural to also possess a tail...completing the look. ...but it didn't...
For fans of "Wolfy" werewolves, having a Full Lupine head, but no tail is like having a roadster without the rag-top.
It may not be neccesary...but it just makes more sense to add the top and make it a Convertable.
Am I being more confusing than helpful?
...or am I just stating the PAINFULLY obvious?
Please Forgive the Occasional Outburst of my Inner Sage ... for he is Oblivious to Sarcasm, and not Easily Silenced.
Shadow Wulf wrote:But do you guys have to bring up the tail part everytime someone mentions Van Helsing Werewolf, you that all the time Renorei, and not just you but others have to.
YES ...weHave To!...
jk-
I think it is because, of all of the movie werewolves that have ever been seen, the VH werewolf looked the most like the actual animal (at least the head) and therefore seemed the most natural to also possess a tail...completing the look. ...but it didn't...
For fans of "Wolfy" werewolves, having a Full Lupine head, but no tail is like having a roadster without the rag-top.
It may not be neccesary...but it just makes more sense to add the top and make it a Convertable.
Am I being more confusing than helpful?
...or am I just stating the PAINFULLY obvious?
Neighter
It could look good with a tail ofcourse but I dont think it would look 100% better with a tail. with that bulit body and short hairs around it(besides head), it would seem quite odd to have fluffy tail in the back to make it look cute from the way you guys are putting it. If it had more hairs and if the body didnt look that muscular and manlike then it would look great with a tail.
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. - Thomas Jefferson
I mean every werewolf i've seen in the movies makes faces looking like they had bad customer service.
Cause most werewolves usaully apear as
A. Snarly mindless Beast.
B. About to attack
C.always a the bad guy
D. To make it looks much more scarier in horror flicks.
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves are its only safe depositories. - Thomas Jefferson
...though I am not a fan of Horror movies, so "Darker" and "Scarier" would not be the goals I would be shooting for when defining the style I would more like to see.
...but more convincingly realistic I am definately all for.
By all means...make me second guess what I believe is real.
Well, apart from the fact that I do like horror-movies, you don't need blood and gore to make a movie more scarier and darker. Why do you think that a lot of people think The Blair Witch Project was scary (at least at the release)? Because it was claimed to be a true legend.
Scott Gardener wrote:
I'd be afraid to shift if I were to lose control. If I just looked fuggly, I'd simply be annoyed every full moon.
Shadow Wulf wrote:But do you guys have to bring up the tail part everytime someone mentions Van Helsing Werewolf, you that all the time Renorei, and not just you but others have to.
YES ...weHave To!...
jk-
I think it is because, of all of the movie werewolves that have ever been seen, the VH werewolf looked the most like the actual animal (at least the head) and therefore seemed the most natural to also possess a tail...completing the look. ...but it didn't...
For fans of "Wolfy" werewolves, having a Full Lupine head, but no tail is like having a roadster without the rag-top.
It may not be neccesary...but it just makes more sense to add the top and make it a Convertable.
Am I being more confusing than helpful?
...or am I just stating the PAINFULLY obvious?
Neighter
It could look good with a tail ofcourse but I dont think it would look 100% better with a tail. with that bulit body and short hairs around it(besides head), it would seem quite odd to have fluffy tail in the back to make it look cute from the way you guys are putting it. If it had more hairs and if the body didnt look that muscular and manlike then it would look great with a tail.
Hmm... It is kinda scary to see that half of this board's users look at werewolf-butts all the time when it comes to werewolf-flicks.
But personally I don't really care. In the beginning I would really like to see a tail on a werewolf, because he just should, blablabla, more lupine blabla... But over the last couple of weeks I also saw a lot of werewolf designs without a tail that were, in any way, a lot more fascinating then the Van Helsing-woof would ever be, IMO. At least you can see that the werewolf, in ways, is still human, without the tail.
Scott Gardener wrote:
I'd be afraid to shift if I were to lose control. If I just looked fuggly, I'd simply be annoyed every full moon.
