This is the place for discussion and voting on various aspects of werewolf life, social ideas, physical appearance, etc. Also a place to vote on how a werewolf should look.
Jamie wrote:The length and presence of a penile bone would not matter as much to placement as you might think, for two reasons:
1) The entire arrangement is not parallel to the skin surface of the male, it is sunk into the abdomen at an angle. Therefore, you don't need to find seven inches of flat skin to place the "equipment" (which is one of the arguments people use for a mid-belly placement).
2) Most photographs I've seen of penile bones, they have at least some curvature, especially near one end. I'm not sure how curved the wolf bones are, but nothing I've seen so far is strictly straight.
2)
The teats are moved to the belly but are not enlarged in the way a human female is (Sorry guys who like the big brested look), and the vulva is canid like with the opening downwards
This would also match the males appearance of having a canid type sheath on the belly and the penile position for intromission.
Just some viewpoints.
Take Care
Marcwolf
Walk Quietly Through This Earth
Leave Nothing But Smiles and PawPrints
The teats are moved to the belly but are not enlarged in the way a human female is (Sorry guys who like the big brested look), and the vulva is canid like with the opening downwards
This would also match the males appearance of having a canid type sheath on the belly and the penile position for intromission.
Just some viewpoints.
Take Care
Marcwolf
Now this makes some sense, but only in the full, rather than the Gestalt form...although, for females "well endowed", going to Four-Foot-Drive in Gestalt form would be rather painful after a very little while...chafing, don'cha'know. Perhaps something would happen with the "Micro-Shift" needed to go into Four-Foot-Drive to begin with.
Perhaps in the Gestalt form, there is some Sheath formation and Breast reduction as part of the shift, just to "keep things out of the way". You do realise that such a change would make the "Missionary Position" into Kink, and the "Wolf" position into the Normal method. Interesting!
RedEye: The Wulf and writer who might really be a Kitsune...
Hmm...a lot of this conversation depends on if your movie is going to be 'that' mature or if it will be more of a broader amount of audience that can veiw such a film. Are you aiming for an extreamly mature audience or just your general rated R or PG-13 horror movie audience?
if mature than i agree with chaos wolf about placement and censorship (if that is what the fur is for then don't add too much for the adult audience)
if you are aiming for the not adult only movie viewers then chaos wolf's placement would work, but you would need to keep the fur scale up a bit (stupid government censorship)
I am not disagreeing with anyone, or saying that these options and ideas are bad, all i am saying is that i don't know what rating you are trying to acheive here, and i have different views on both.
I am not against anyone's ideas/opinions. (just making that clear)
whereismydemon wrote:Hmm...a lot of this conversation depends on if your movie is going to be 'that' mature or if it will be more of a broader amount of audience that can veiw such a film.
Actually, by now, I think this topic, like most of them in this forum, have passed beyond being just "for the movie". Most of the decisions about Freeborn have already been made.
By now, it seems we're mostly just writing our own mythology. The fact that our various discussions about werewolves and their behavior, physiology, origins and whatnot have a movie tie-in seems almost like a secondary issue.
We no longer are merely making the movie - we ARE the movie.
whereismydemon wrote:Maybe you are right, but i still want to know what rating they are aiming for in this project. We're kinda left without a full plate of facts here.
I think we're aiming for an "R". Not for the sake of being gratuitous with sex and/or violence, but just to be on the safe side, since by virtue of having transformations and fighting, there will probably be more nudity and blood than a mere "PG-13" may permit.
okkkk....
First of all (here comes the stupid question) what are the differences??
second of all for a excellent wel..... scene read Scott Gardners Lycanthrope (still cant spell) halfway through ch. 6
Link http://www.geocities.com/jonlrabbit/lycanthrope.rtf
The Think Geek Annoy-o-Tron, insanity in convenient attractive box.
well, i think a mate would have the same things like a canine ( knot, sheath and so on) because a wolf (or werewolf) would look strange with human genitals. But mostly of them is covered with fur. i think it would look strange when you walk on 2 legs and got a sheath at your belly pointing at everyone who s standing in front of you...
And femals would have canine genitals because male got also canine genitals....sounds logical for me....