Other were creatures?
Other were creatures?
Just a thought, I went through the old topics and didn't spot anything that seemed to handle this matter.
There are legends of shape-shifters told in every corner of the world. Most of these stories reflect the local fauna. What do you people think about non-wolf lycanthropes? How 'bout interaction between different shifter species? Should there be a feeling of kinship or rivalry?
Should there be any reference to other shifters in the movie?
There are legends of shape-shifters told in every corner of the world. Most of these stories reflect the local fauna. What do you people think about non-wolf lycanthropes? How 'bout interaction between different shifter species? Should there be a feeling of kinship or rivalry?
Should there be any reference to other shifters in the movie?
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2335
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:28 pm
Porbably there wion't be any refrences to other shifters, and i htink that they would have some sort of petty rivalry but not much. (tigers are better than wolfes! no they're not! We so are! No! Yes! No! yEs! etc.) also the same type would porbably tend to bond more or group themselves together. as in i notice that there are two weretigers on here (Me and terestas)(maybe three; silver bengal tiger) but never bothered to count the nuimber of werewolves.
- Terastas
- Legendary
- Posts: 5193
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 4:03 pm
- Custom Title: Spare Pelican
- Gender: Male
- Location: Las Vegas
- Contact:
Three of you count Vilkacis.
And we have discussed this prior, but to the best of my knowledge, there hasn't been a thread devoted specifically to it.
I guess if you believe in werewolves, it wouldn't be too far off to assume there are different variations of lycanthropy or other syndromes with a similar nature to lycanthropy.
It was also suggested in a previous thread, if I recall, that many of the legends are about the same species, but were given different names in accordance with the regional perspectives. In other words, "werewolf" is the European definition because they saw lycanthropes as most closely resembling wolves, whereas Asians thought they most closely resembled foxes and dubbed them kitsunes, Africans attributed their traits as those of jackals, Native Americans compared them to coyotes, etc.
But that wouldn't explain other common variations like tanuki and the wampus cat, and besides, having shapeshifting be restricted to canines is just plain boring.
As for interaction... Well, the canine mindset is fairly different from the feline, so they would have their differences. However, all werekin share a common plight, that being the oppression from a massive super-paranoid society. Wether they like each other or not is open to debate, but they could at least relate with each other because they share each other's problems. A werecat wouldn't always be invited into the pack, but I imagine that in most cases, they would at the very least exchange phone numbers for emergency use only.
And we have discussed this prior, but to the best of my knowledge, there hasn't been a thread devoted specifically to it.
I guess if you believe in werewolves, it wouldn't be too far off to assume there are different variations of lycanthropy or other syndromes with a similar nature to lycanthropy.
It was also suggested in a previous thread, if I recall, that many of the legends are about the same species, but were given different names in accordance with the regional perspectives. In other words, "werewolf" is the European definition because they saw lycanthropes as most closely resembling wolves, whereas Asians thought they most closely resembled foxes and dubbed them kitsunes, Africans attributed their traits as those of jackals, Native Americans compared them to coyotes, etc.
But that wouldn't explain other common variations like tanuki and the wampus cat, and besides, having shapeshifting be restricted to canines is just plain boring.
As for interaction... Well, the canine mindset is fairly different from the feline, so they would have their differences. However, all werekin share a common plight, that being the oppression from a massive super-paranoid society. Wether they like each other or not is open to debate, but they could at least relate with each other because they share each other's problems. A werecat wouldn't always be invited into the pack, but I imagine that in most cases, they would at the very least exchange phone numbers for emergency use only.
Feline: yes. Tiger: no. Were: no.Terastas wrote:Three of you count Vilkacis.
And for all that my avatar is a wolf, it was never intended to represent me. I had just gotten my Wacom tablet, and I felt like drawing a wolf. I also needed an avatar and I didn't want to use one created by someone else. So... I have a wolf for an avatar -- until I get around to creating something better.
-- Vilkacis
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 13085
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 5:27 am
- Custom Title: Executive Producer (Red Victoria)
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tejas
Vilkacis means "wolf's eyes."Fenrir wrote:But even your name sorta means werewolf doesn't it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilkacis
Thats why his avatar shows a close up of a wolf's eye.
Hmmmm...I'm tempted on taking his avatar and making that eye wink.
I wanna see thatFigarou wrote:Vilkacis means "wolf's eyes."Fenrir wrote:But even your name sorta means werewolf doesn't it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilkacis
Thats why his avatar shows a close up of a wolf's eye.
Hmmmm...I'm tempted on taking his avatar and making that eye wink.
Erm ... Not quite true. It's an interesting coincidence, but I never consciously chose to do it that way. The reason it's a close-up of a wolf's eye is mostly because of my utter lack of anatomical knowledge -- I didn't think I could do anything more complex at the time.Figarou wrote:Vilkacis means "wolf's eyes."
Thats why his avatar shows a close up of a wolf's eye.
As for 'Vilkacis,' while it is a werewolf-like creature, I've been using that name for a couple years now, and ... it's just a name -- an identity marker. For those who know me, I think my personality and actions here are more strongly attached to the name than it's original meaning; thus, I don't feel particularly bound to having such a creature as my online representation.
-- Vilkacis
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
Well what are you then?
I think different were-creatures could get along fine. I've had cats and dogs that are the best of friends before. Of course they were domesticated, but they're still basically the same as the wild animals. Furthermore, the animal aspect isn't the most important part. It's the human part of their brain that would likely form friendships.
I think different were-creatures could get along fine. I've had cats and dogs that are the best of friends before. Of course they were domesticated, but they're still basically the same as the wild animals. Furthermore, the animal aspect isn't the most important part. It's the human part of their brain that would likely form friendships.
Yes, I know. My cat and dog are great with each other, despite the obvious "language barrier". But even if we are talking about a more human-based werewolf, they would still get some influences from the wolf side.Excelsia wrote:I think different were-creatures could get along fine. I've had cats and dogs that are the best of friends before. Of course they were domesticated, but they're still basically the same as the wild animals. Furthermore, the animal aspect isn't the most important part. It's the human part of their brain that would likely form friendships.
Let's say a... coyote shifter *points to herself* and a wolf shifter crossed ways. In nature, wolves treat coyotes as rivals and often kill them. To me it would make sense if the two would be at least somewhat vary of one another, the wolf possibly taking on a higher-than-thou attitude. If they were familiar to one another, it would probably be:
"Hey idiot"
"Hey bastard."
And then they'd be off their merry way.[/i]
- Wolfhanyou
- Legendary
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 5:38 pm
- Location: In a Box Being Sold On Ebay
- Contact:
Just like humans!Merrypaws wrote:Yes, I know. My cat and dog are great with each other, despite the obvious "language barrier". But even if we are talking about a more human-based werewolf, they would still get some influences from the wolf side.Excelsia wrote:I think different were-creatures could get along fine. I've had cats and dogs that are the best of friends before. Of course they were domesticated, but they're still basically the same as the wild animals. Furthermore, the animal aspect isn't the most important part. It's the human part of their brain that would likely form friendships.
Let's say a... coyote shifter *points to herself* and a wolf shifter crossed ways. In nature, wolves treat coyotes as rivals and often kill them. To me it would make sense if the two would be at least somewhat vary of one another, the wolf possibly taking on a higher-than-thou attitude. If they were familiar to one another, it would probably be:
"Hey idiot"
"Hey bastard."
And then they'd be off their merry way.[/i]
Or maybe they could become (close) friends though they tend to insult each-other more often than the average relationship?
Boo
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 13085
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 5:27 am
- Custom Title: Executive Producer (Red Victoria)
- Gender: Male
- Location: Tejas
Vilkacis wrote:Erm ... Not quite true. It's an interesting coincidence, but I never consciously chose to do it that way. The reason it's a close-up of a wolf's eye is mostly because of my utter lack of anatomical knowledge -- I didn't think I could do anything more complex at the time.Figarou wrote:Vilkacis means "wolf's eyes."
Thats why his avatar shows a close up of a wolf's eye.
-- Vilkacis
Oh...now we know.
- Terastas
- Legendary
- Posts: 5193
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 4:03 pm
- Custom Title: Spare Pelican
- Gender: Male
- Location: Las Vegas
- Contact:
*nods* This is exactly what I was getting at. The differences even between two canines like wolves and coyotes are vast enough that they would naturally feel wary of the other, but on the other hand, they are still A) half humans with the ability to shift into something else, and B) faced with the exact same problems, therefore they stick together, even though they may resent each other.Merrypaws wrote:Yes, I know. My cat and dog are great with each other, despite the obvious "language barrier". But even if we are talking about a more human-based werewolf, they would still get some influences from the wolf side.
Let's say a... coyote shifter *points to herself* and a wolf shifter crossed ways. In nature, wolves treat coyotes as rivals and often kill them. To me it would make sense if the two would be at least somewhat vary of one another, the wolf possibly taking on a higher-than-thou attitude. If they were familiar to one another, it would probably be:
"Hey idiot"
"Hey bastard."
And then they'd be off their merry way.[/i]
You see this a lot among humans too, especially in the workplace. There's always someone in the office that we can't stand, but it's easier to suffer their presence than it is to find another job that could very well end up having longer hours, a smaller paycheck and another co-worker that we can't stand.
-
- Legendary
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:01 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: North Carolina
Mmmm....Well I can see how werepeople whose animal forms are natural enemies might be wary of each other. But take a werewolf and a werelion for example. These two creatures never encounter each other in nature (although wolves do encounter cougars, who are vaguely similar), so I think these two could get along. Basically I think that werecreatures whose animal forms don't have an instinctual dislike for another's animal form could easily get along really well.
I still think the most important part of a wereanimal is the human part, however, so I honestly think that despite the differences in their animal forms, most werecreatures could get along fine.
I still think the most important part of a wereanimal is the human part, however, so I honestly think that despite the differences in their animal forms, most werecreatures could get along fine.
- Terastas
- Legendary
- Posts: 5193
- Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 4:03 pm
- Custom Title: Spare Pelican
- Gender: Male
- Location: Las Vegas
- Contact:
Exactly, ultimately it would come down to the same things that determine how fellow werewolves get along; their values and their personalities.Excelsia wrote:I still think the most important part of a wereanimal is the human part, however, so I honestly think that despite the differences in their animal forms, most werecreatures could get along fine.
Yes! In many cases, you might expect a canine shapeshifter and a feline shapeshifter to get along better than two different kinds of canine (or feline) shapeshifters.Merrypaws wrote:Yes, I know. My cat and dog are great with each other, despite the obvious "language barrier". But even if we are talking about a more human-based werewolf, they would still get some influences from the wolf side.
Let's say a... coyote shifter *points to herself* and a wolf shifter crossed ways. In nature, wolves treat coyotes as rivals and often kill them. To me it would make sense if the two would be at least somewhat vary of one another, the wolf possibly taking on a higher-than-thou attitude. If they were familiar to one another, it would probably be:
"Hey idiot"
"Hey bastard."
And then they'd be off their merry way.[/i]
For example, lions kill cheetahs whenever they can, and lions kill leopards whenever they can. Meanwhile, leopards kill cheetahs. Among canines, wolves kill coyotes, and coyotes kill foxes. However, wolves and foxes get along wonderfully.
Except for the well-known hyena/lion rivalry, most predators kill competing predators that are closely related to them and of a similar size.
However, I think humanity would tend to prevail unless the werebeast were of the kind that is born as an animal. I imagine that animal-species rivalries or predator/prey relationships would be a minor irritant, but not a source of hatred in and of themselves.
As far as the folklore goes, in research for my books I've found some references to different kinds of werebeast being together. For example, Navajo skinwalker legends about mixed packs of werecoyotes and werewolves. There are also some European legends about werewolf packs being led by a panther. In Transylvanian werewolf lore, it is common for werewolves, weredogs and werepigs to run together in a pack. In the Far East, whenever I see legends about two or more kinds of shapeshifter, half the time they are rivals, and half the time they are allies. There are not a whole lot of legends about more than one type of werebeast appearing in the same legend, so it is hard to say much more than what I've written here.
-Jamie Hall
Do you like monsters? See Monster Mania!
Do you like monsters? See Monster Mania!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 3203
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 3:07 pm
- Gender: Male
- Mood: Meh...
- Location: Where soul meets body