http://werewolf-news.com/2009/09/the-we ... ly-bitten/
http://www.werewolfguidetolife.com/
It really reminds me of stuff we talk about here. (Especially the take off all jewlery part)


Yup. It's something that could be overlooked in film making.Silverclaw wrote:
It really reminds me of stuff we talk about here. (Especially the take off all jewlery part)

But Van Helsing is a crap film.Figarou wrote:Yup. It's something that could be overlooked in film making.Silverclaw wrote:
It really reminds me of stuff we talk about here. (Especially the take off all jewlery part)
I explained it here back in 2004.
http://www.thepack.network/thepackboard ... ?f=6&t=131
It happened in Van Helsing as a goof. He transformed while wearing the ring. It disappeared after transforming. Then reappeared when he reverted back to a human.
You can clearly see the ring seconds before he transforms.
Afterwards, the ring is gone.
Then when he became human again, the ring returns.
Scott Gardener wrote: I'd be afraid to shift if I were to lose control. If I just looked fuggly, I'd simply be annoyed every full moon.


O RLY?RedEye wrote:Just to play Devil's advocate, I'll point out that in Van Helsing, the werewolf was essentially a magical beastie.
If it was choice "A," then yes, it'll make sence.Thus when he transformed, the ring was tucked away with his human body in what is
called "Magical Cold Storage"- ie; it was a transformation, not a shift.
This makes about as much sense as the movie did, IMHO.

