Well, it's not like the several hundred people that are registered to this forum all have to be chosen from. There are only about 20 of us are so that are active and contribute a lot.outwarddoodles wrote:I don't think that would be a good idea, actually. Mainly because you're asking Anthony to list out everyone on their contribution to The Pack -- which would be a very subjective and difficult task. I'm doubtful it's something our already busy Director could manage to do. So, his Solution? Set down a few rules, and start randomly picking people from there. If I were him, I'd probably of done the same.Quite frankly, I don't think the selection should be random at all. I think it should be based on how much you've contributed to the pack (which is not directly related to post count or join date, but often correllates...though not all the time. There are some people in this pack who have massive numbers of posts, but have actually said very little than can be helpful, and vice versa). AB and Silver are both around here often enough to get an idea of who contributes and who doesn't.
BUT, regardless of whether that is possible or not, I also made this suggestion:
Also, keep in mind that, as someone who read the script in January, you are unlikely to be able to truly understand how a member of the forum who has been here awhile and offered lots of opinions, but hasn't gotten to read the script yet, feels....or if it is decided randomly, the criteria to be a part of the 'random pool' should be upped substantially, IMO.
And remember also, that I said this:
I truly do feel this way. It's not my script, so it's not up to me to decide how it's handled. I wish the best of luck to AB and Silver, however they choose to handle all things like this in the future.But anyway, these are just my thoughts. It's AB and Silver's script, so it's up to them to handle it as they wish.


